All authors
Claude Skills by brycewang-stanford
github.com/brycewang-stanford5,310 skills37 installs6,514 views
- Revacc Topic SelectionUse when scoping or pressure-testing the research question for a Review of Accounting Studies (RAST) manuscript — confirming it is a contribution-driven financial-accounting question that fits RAST's archival/analytical/experimental lanes. Locks the question; it does not build the model (revacc-theory-development) or design identification (revacc-methods).Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,052
- Revacc WorkflowUse when deciding which revacc-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for a Review of Accounting Studies (RAST) submission. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,052
- Revacc Writing StyleUse when the prose is the bottleneck for a Review of Accounting Studies (RAST) manuscript — front-loading the contribution, writing an abstract and introduction that land, and adopting the accounting house voice. Polishes the manuscript; it does not sharpen the contribution claim (revacc-contribution-framing) or build exhibits (revacc-tables-figures).Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,052
- Restat IdentificationUse when the causal-identification or measurement strategy is the bottleneck for a The Review of Economics and Statistics (REStat) manuscript — a DID / RD / IV / shift-share design, or a measurement / measurement-error problem. Stress-tests the design to REStat's applied-econometrics-and-measurement bar before exhibits are finalized.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,052
- Restat Literature PositioningUse when the marginal contribution of a The Review of Economics and Statistics (REStat) manuscript against the closest prior work is fuzzy, generic, or oversold. Stakes the contribution precisely; it does not run analysis or write the full literature review.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,052
- Restat RebuttalUse when a The Review of Economics and Statistics (REStat) decision letter (R&R or reject-and-resubmit) has arrived and the manuscript needs a response-to-referees letter and a revision plan. Drafts the response strategy; it does not run new analysis (route that to the analysis skills).Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,052
- Restat Referee StrategyUse when anticipating the objections a The Review of Economics and Statistics (REStat) referee will raise for a given design, and pre-empting them in the manuscript before submission. Maps threats to defenses; it does not draft the post-decision response letter (that is restat-rebuttal).Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,052
- Restat Replication PackageUse when assembling the data-and-code replication package for a The Review of Economics and Statistics (REStat) manuscript under the journal's Data and Code Availability Policy — the deposit to the REStat Harvard Dataverse with a README that permits replication. Builds the package; it does not run the primary analysis.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,052
- Restat RobustnessUse when the headline estimate of a The Review of Economics and Statistics (REStat) manuscript needs to survive specification, sample, measurement, and inference choices before submission. Builds the robustness suite that REStat referees expect; it does not establish the primary identification.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,052
- Restat SubmissionUse when running the final pre-submission preflight for The Review of Economics and Statistics (REStat) via Editorial Express — format rules, abstract limit, online-appendix cap, article categories, submission fee, the proprietary-data fee hold, and house style. Final checks; it does not draft content.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,052
- Restat Tables FiguresUse when building or revising the exhibits of a The Review of Economics and Statistics (REStat) manuscript so the main result is legible in one table or figure in AEA/REStat house style. Designs publication-grade exhibits; it does not run the underlying estimation.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,052
- Restat Theory ModelUse when deciding how much theory or structure a The Review of Economics and Statistics (REStat) manuscript should carry — right-sizing a model so it interprets or disciplines the empirical estimate without becoming the contribution. Calibrates the theory's role; it does not develop new theory for its own sake.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,052
- Restat Topic SelectionUse when deciding whether an applied-economics project fits The Review of Economics and Statistics (REStat) rather than AER / AEJ:Applied / J. Econometrics / a field journal, and sharpening the question to REStat's empirical-and-measurement bar. Decides venue fit and frames the question; it does not run the analysis.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,052
- Restat WorkflowUse when deciding which restat-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for a The Review of Economics and Statistics (REStat) submission. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,052
- Restat Writing StyleUse when revising the prose of a The Review of Economics and Statistics (REStat) manuscript — especially the abstract and introduction — so the applied question and the estimate land immediately in REStat house style. Polishes framing and prose; it does not change results or identification.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,052
- Revedres Comprehensiveness And BalanceUse when testing exhaustiveness, risk-of-bias, heterogeneity, and sensitivity for a Review of Educational Research (RER) review or meta-analysis. Hardens the synthesis against omission and fragility; it does not build the conceptual spine (revedres-organizing-framework) or settle coding reliability and open materials (revedres-transparency-and-reproducibility).Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,052
- Revedres Editor StrategyUse when anticipating editor and reviewer expectations, framing the contribution, and positioning scope for a Review of Educational Research (RER) submission. Aligns the review with how RER is refereed; it does not run the submission preflight (revedres-submission) or draft the response to reviewers (revedres-revision).Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,052
- Revedres Literature SynthesisUse when executing the systematic search, screening to a PRISMA flow, and extracting data for a Review of Educational Research (RER) review or meta-analysis. Builds the documented evidence corpus; it does not impose the conceptual spine (revedres-organizing-framework) or run robustness/risk-of-bias appraisal (revedres-comprehensiveness-and-balance).Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,052
- Revedres Organizing FrameworkUse when turning a screened, coded corpus into an analytic spine that advances theory or policy for a Review of Educational Research (RER) manuscript. Builds the conceptual contribution beyond a tally; it does not run the search (revedres-literature-synthesis) or appraise robustness/risk-of-bias (revedres-comprehensiveness-and-balance).Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,052
- Revedres Proposal And CommissioningUse when writing the protocol, fixing scope and eligibility, and (where applicable) preregistering a systematic review or meta-analysis before searching, for a Review of Educational Research (RER) manuscript. Produces the a-priori plan; it does not run the search (revedres-literature-synthesis) or impose the conceptual spine (revedres-organizing-framework).Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,052
- Revedres RevisionUse when an editor/reviewer decision letter arrives on a Review of Educational Research (RER) review or meta-analysis and you must plan the revision and response. Turns the letter into action and a point-by-point reply; it does not run the submission preflight (revedres-submission) or re-architect the framework from scratch (revedres-organizing-framework).Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,052
- Revedres SubmissionUse when running the final pre-submission preflight for a Review of Educational Research (RER) manuscript via Manuscript Central — masking, APA 7, the 150-word abstract, file set, and reporting-standard attachments. Checks readiness to submit; it does not negotiate scope (revedres-editor-strategy) or handle the decision letter (revedres-revision).Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,052
- Revedres Tables FiguresUse when designing the PRISMA flow diagram, forest/funnel plots, and coding/evidence tables for a Review of Educational Research (RER) review or meta-analysis. Builds exhibits that carry the synthesis; it does not run the analyses (revedres-comprehensiveness-and-balance) or settle reproducibility of the underlying data (revedres-transparency-and-reproducibility).Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,052
- Revedres Topic SelectionUse when deciding whether a question is synthesis-worthy and RER-scale before committing to a Review of Educational Research (RER) review or meta-analysis. Tests fit and frames the contribution; it does not run the search (revedres-literature-synthesis) or write the protocol (revedres-proposal-and-commissioning).Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,052
- Revedres Transparency And ReproducibilityUse when settling coding reliability, open materials, PRISMA/MARS reporting, and a reproducible meta-analysis for a Review of Educational Research (RER) manuscript. Makes the review auditable and re-runnable; it does not run the substantive robustness analyses (revedres-comprehensiveness-and-balance) or design the exhibits (revedres-tables-figures).Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,052
- Revedres WorkflowUse when deciding which revedres-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing a systematic review, meta-analysis, or critical integrative synthesis from question-scoping through revision for a Review of Educational Research (RER) manuscript. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,052
- Revedres Writing StyleUse when drafting or revising prose, the 150-word abstract, and the introduction in the Review of Educational Research (RER) synthesizing voice and APA 7 style. Lands the integrative voice; it does not build the analytic spine (revedres-organizing-framework) or design exhibits (revedres-tables-figures).Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,052
- Sigcomm Artifact EvaluationUse when packaging an ACM SIGCOMM paper's code, traces, topologies, and configuration for the artifact-evaluation committee — choosing ACM badges (Artifacts Available, Evaluated, Results Reproduced) as claim calibration, building downscaled topologies and trace substitutes, and making a networking testbed result rebuildable by a reviewer.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,052
- Sigcomm Author ResponseUse when drafting an ACM SIGCOMM rebuttal or executing a shepherd-run one-shot revision — triaging reviewer issues, writing a decision-focused anonymous rebuttal for the discussion phase, and building the revision packet (point-by-point response, change-marked manuscript, and list of changes) against the required-changes contract.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,052
- Sigcomm Camera ReadyUse when preparing an accepted ACM SIGCOMM paper for the TAPS proceedings — clearing shepherd sign-off in HotCRP, uploading the final PDF plus source under acmart, de-anonymizing author and deployment identity, keeping the 12-page body under ACM two-column reflow, appendix-necessity approval, and releasing the public artifact by the badge deadline.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,052
- Sigcomm ExperimentsUse when designing or auditing ACM SIGCOMM experiments — climbing the evidence ladder from microbenchmarks to testbed and trace replay to deployment, choosing baselines that match the deployed state of the art, reporting tail percentiles and variance over repeated trials, mapping break points, and holding the fair variable fixed.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,052
- Sigcomm Related WorkUse when positioning an ACM SIGCOMM submission against the networking literature — sweeping SIGCOMM, NSDI, MobiCom, CoNEXT, IMC, and SIGMETRICS plus journals, proving each placement via dblp and the ACM Digital Library, distinguishing main-track papers from CCR editorials, handling concurrent work, and keeping self-citation double-blind-safe.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,052
- Sigcomm ReproducibilityUse when strengthening the reproducibility evidence of an ACM SIGCOMM paper — topology and testbed ledgers, traffic workload and trace provenance, configuration and version pinning, tail-percentile run counts and variance, legal data-release decisions, and consistency between the paper's claims and the artifact that backs them.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,052
- Sigcomm Review ProcessUse when explaining or planning around ACM SIGCOMM peer review — double-blind HotCRP reviewing, the early-reject cut for consensus rejections, the rebuttal for discussion-phase papers, the shepherd-run one-shot revision that ends in accept or reject only, shepherding of accepted papers, and how the outcome space shapes author strategy.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,052
- Sigcomm SubmissionUse when running the final pre-upload audit of an ACM SIGCOMM submission — the abstract-registration-then-paper sequence on the SIGCOMM HotCRP site, the AoE deadline clock, the 12 single-spaced pre-reference pages including figures and tables, double-blind anonymization, ACM acmart formatting, and the research-versus-experience track choice.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,052
- Sigcomm SupplementaryUse when organizing the material around an ACM SIGCOMM paper — deciding what lives in the 12-page body versus references versus optional appendices, keeping the main paper self-contained, anticipating the shepherd's appendix-necessity approval, and placing extended measurements and proofs outside the cap without hiding load-bearing content.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,052
- Sigcomm Topic SelectionUse when deciding whether a project is a strong ACM SIGCOMM fit, choosing the research versus experience track, identifying the networking-stack mechanism at the core of the contribution, and routing misfits to NSDI, MobiCom, CoNEXT, IMC, SIGMETRICS, or a systems venue before writing begins.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,052
- Sigcomm WorkflowUse when planning an ACM SIGCOMM project timeline around the single yearly deadline — venue fit, evidence lock, abstract registration and paper upload in February, the early-reject/rebuttal/one-shot-revision review pipeline, shepherd-run camera-ready, TAPS proceedings, artifact evaluation, and forward planning for the next edition.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,052
- Sigcomm Writing StyleUse when revising an ACM SIGCOMM paper for its house style — leading with measured operational pain, stating a design principle rather than a behavior, pairing every claim with testbed/trace/deployment evidence, reporting tails instead of superlatives, and fitting the argument into 12 figure-inclusive pages while keeping blinding clean.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,052
- Siggraph Artifact EvaluationUse when pursuing the Graphics Replicability Stamp (GRSI) or Code Replicability in Computer Graphics (CRCG) recognition for an accepted SIGGRAPH / TOG paper, covering how graphics replicability differs from ACM artifact badging, what volunteers actually run, deterministic result reproduction, Software Heritage archiving, and the separate post-acceptance timing.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,052
- Siggraph Author ResponseUse when writing the SIGGRAPH / SIGGRAPH Asia Technical Papers rebuttal, the single 1000-word text-only author response uploaded during the rebuttal window to correct factual errors and answer specific reviewer questions before the Technical Papers Committee meeting, and when planning the change list for a conditionally accepted paper's second-stage revision.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,052
- Siggraph Camera ReadyUse when preparing the final version of a conditionally accepted SIGGRAPH / SIGGRAPH Asia Technical Paper for publication in ACM Transactions on Graphics, covering the second-stage committee verification, TOG journal metadata and DOI, ACM rights and CCS concepts, final results video and representative image, and permanent code/data links.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,052
- Siggraph ExperimentsUse when designing or auditing the evaluation of a SIGGRAPH / TOG paper, covering head-to-head comparisons against the strongest prior method, ablations, performance/timing reporting with hardware, image/geometry quality metrics, perceptual and user studies, and matching the evidence to the graphics claim shape.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,052
- Siggraph Related WorkUse when writing or auditing the related-work positioning of a SIGGRAPH / TOG paper, covering the computer-graphics literature lanes (rendering, geometry, animation, simulation, imaging, fabrication, learning-for-graphics), capability-delta positioning against the strongest prior method, and correct attribution across SIGGRAPH, SIGGRAPH Asia, TOG, EG/CGF, and sibling venues.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,052
- Siggraph ReproducibilityUse when building the reproducibility story for a SIGGRAPH / TOG paper, covering deterministic result regeneration, scene/mesh/weight provenance, hardware and timing disclosure, floating-point and GPU non-determinism, and a code/data release that a reader or a Graphics Replicability Stamp volunteer can actually run.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,052
- Siggraph Review ProcessUse to model the SIGGRAPH / SIGGRAPH Asia Technical Papers review pipeline and calibrate expectations, covering the single 6-point score scale, the primary/secondary/tertiary reviewer structure, the 1000-word rebuttal, the Technical Papers Committee meeting, conditional acceptance with second-stage verification, and the dual-track Journal-vs-Conference decision.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,052
- Siggraph SubmissionUse when auditing an ACM SIGGRAPH / SIGGRAPH Asia Technical Papers submission for Linklings readiness, covering the two-step form-then-upload deadline, the acmart (>=2.16) format and the 7-page conference-track budget, the dual-track vs Journal-only choice, the mandatory representative image and supplemental video, and desk-risk triage before the UTC cutoff.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,052
- Siggraph SupplementaryUse when planning the SIGGRAPH / TOG supplemental package, especially the results video that reviewers weight heavily, plus comparison galleries, additional results, code and data, and appendices, and when deciding what evidence must live in the 7-page body versus the supplemental material.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,052
- Siggraph Topic SelectionUse before committing a project to SIGGRAPH / SIGGRAPH Asia / TOG, to decide whether the contribution is graphics-shaped and which venue and track fit, routing among SIGGRAPH, SIGGRAPH Asia, direct-to-TOG, and siblings (CVPR/ICCV, CHI/UIST, Eurographics/EGSR/SGP/SCA/HPG/I3D), and whether to aim dual-track or Journal-only.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,052
- Siggraph WorkflowUse to plan a SIGGRAPH or SIGGRAPH Asia Technical Papers campaign backward from the deadline, covering the two annual cycles, the form-then-upload two-step submission, the rebuttal window, the Technical Papers Committee decision, conditional-accept second-stage revision, TOG camera-ready, and the in-person presentation.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 1,052