All authors
Claude Skills by yogsoth-ai
github.com/yogsoth-ai1,223 skills7 installs1,449 views
- Facet BisociationBridge two unrelated thinking matrices via Koestler bisociation. Identify independent frames of reference and force collision to produce creative insight.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 417
- Factor EnumerationList all key factors, conditions, and assumptions that support or enable the artifact's conclusion.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 417
- Factor IdentificationIdentify independent, dependent, and control variables for an experimentVotes: 0GitHub stars: 417
- Factor RemovalStrategy: Systematic factor removal — remove factors one at a time and observe whether the conclusion remains stable, identifying which factors are load-bearing.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 417
- Factorial IdeationDOE thinking: identify factors, define levels, and explore combinations to systematically cover the design space.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 417
- Failure AnticipationCampaign: Forward-looking failure analysis combining pre-mortem rapid screening with systematic FMEA deep-dive. Core question: If this artifact fails, how will it fail? Methods: Klein Pre-Mortem 2007, AIAG-VDA FMEA 2019, IEC 60812.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 417
- Failure Chain ConstructionBuild cause-mode-effect chains tracing upstream root causes and downstream cascading effects for each failure mode.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 417
- Failure Chain TracingTactic: Trace upstream causes and downstream effects of each failure mode. Builds multi-level cause-mode-effect chains for systemic understanding.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 417
- Failure ClusteringGroup observed failures by mechanism (not symptom), identify common triggers per cluster, estimate frequency and severity.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 417
- Failure Driven GenerationGenerate targeted solutions for each identified failure mode, ensuring every failure has at least one proposed mitigation.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 417
- Failure Mode AnalysisSystematically catalog failure modes — generate edge cases, observe failures, cluster by mechanism, identify triggers and frequency.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 417
- Failure Mode ExtractionExtract structured failure mode list from raw scenarios or artifact analysis. Produces standardized failure mode records.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 417
- Failure TaxonomyCatalog all failure modes in a domain, classify them systematically, and generate targeted solutions for each failure type.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 417
- False Gap FilteringDetect false gaps — search failures, already-solved gaps, and inherently unanswerable questions masquerading as research gaps.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 417
- Falsifiability AuditGate a hypothesis on falsifiability, operational definition, and boundary conditions; can be entered from any hypothesis-generation path.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 417
- Falsifiability CheckSOP: 检验假设是否满足可证伪性标准Votes: 0GitHub stars: 417
- Fantasy AnalogyWish-fulfillment thinking — ignore physical laws for ideal solution. Use unconstrained imagination to reveal what the problem truly needs.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 417
- Fantasy WishUnconstrained wish-fulfillment ideation. Ignore all physical laws to imagine the ideal solution, then identify realization directions.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 417
- Feasibility AssessmentFeasibility Assessment Campaign — evaluate whether selected candidates can actually be implemented using TRL, NASSS, Stage-Gate, TRIZ, TOC, and parametric estimation methods.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 417
- Feasibility CheckCross-reference the GoalTree against ActorProfile (capabilities), ObstacleReport (known barriers), and timeline (deadline feasibility). Identify infeasible paths and suggest OR alternatives.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 417
- Feasibility Constrained FormulationStrategy: 在资源约束下重塑研究问题 — pragmatic 调整保持核心价值Votes: 0GitHub stars: 417
- Feasibility ScoringSOP: 评估研究 gap 的可攻击性，识别瓶颈并输出可行性评分Votes: 0GitHub stars: 417
- Feasibility SynthesisSynthesize all assessments into a feasibility matrix, recommendation, and risk summary.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 417
- Feedback DistributionCreate anonymized feedback report summarizing group judgment distribution for a given round.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 417
- Final ValidationSelf-review the North Star + ResearchBrief for completeness, consistency, and clarity before presenting to user. If issues found, return to specific tactic/SOP for targeted fix. If passes, present final output to user for confirmation.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 417
- Finding AggregationAggregate, deduplicate, and classify findings from multiple probes into a coherent vulnerability report.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 417
- Finer Criteria CheckSOP: FINER 5 项标准逐项检验研究问题质量Votes: 0GitHub stars: 417
- Five Whys DrillingIterative "Why?" questioning (5+ levels) to drill from surface phenomenon to actionable root cause. Each level verified against evidence.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 417
- Flip Point DetectionFind the minimal change magnitude along a dimension that causes the conclusion to flip from true to false.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 417
- Force FitForce-fit excursion discoveries back to the original problem. Deliberately create connections between unrelated findings and the challenge.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 417
- Forced Bridge ConstructionForce connections between unrelated technologies. Deliberately construct bridges where none naturally exist to discover novel integration possibilities.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 417
- Forced ConnectionForce connection between two unrelated concepts. Deliberately construct bridging paths where no natural connection exists.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 417
- Formulate Top GoalFormalize a research goal as an outcome, desired effect, and explicit constraints.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 417
- FractionationSplit concepts into smaller units and recombine them differently to produce novel structures.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 417
- Fragility FlaggingIdentify which specific assumption changes cause conclusion divergence. Rates fragility severity and plausibility of alternatives.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 417
- Fragility MeasurementCompute a fragility index from flip-point distances and degradation scores, summarizing how robust the conclusion is.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 417
- Framework Guided FormulationStrategy: 选择 RQ 框架（PICO/SPIDER/SPICE/ECLIPSE）并系统应用Votes: 0GitHub stars: 417
- Framework MatchingSOP: 根据研究类型匹配最适合的 RQ 框架Votes: 0GitHub stars: 417
- Framework Selection And ApplicationTactic: 选择最适合的 RQ 框架并系统应用Votes: 0GitHub stars: 417
- Full RankingProduce a complete ordering of all candidates using PROMETHEE I/II, ELECTRE III, or MAVT methods.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 417
- Function AnalysisFMEA Step 3: Decompose artifact into function tree — identify what each component is supposed to do before analyzing how it can fail.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 417
- Function CombinationTRIZ function analysis: function-level recombination and redistributionVotes: 0GitHub stars: 417
- Function Model ConstructionBuild substance-field functional model of a system, annotating useful, harmful, insufficient, and excessive interactions.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 417
- Function RedistributionRedistribute functions across different componentsVotes: 0GitHub stars: 417
- Function TrimmingRemove components while preserving function via TRIZ trimming methodology. Simplify systems by redistributing functions.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 417
- Functional AnalogyMap technical functions to biological functions, find organisms solving equivalent problems. Deep functional matching across domains.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 417
- Functional Model BiologyBuild biological system functional model. Map energy, matter, and information flows.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 417
- Future Reality ProjectionProject solution effects using Future Reality Tree logicVotes: 0GitHub stars: 417
- Futures CalibrationAggregate probability judgments across perspectives using Real-Time Delphi or prediction market mechanisms.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 417
- Gap AnalysisGap Analysis Campaign — identify, classify, validate, and prioritize research gaps via systematic evidence mapping. 5 strategies (gap-identification, gap-classification, gap-validation, gap-prioritization, gap-synthesis), 3 tactics, 12 subagent SOPs.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 417