Skip to content
Back to skills

Bug Bounty

ASecurity

Bug bounty program management and security disclosure expertise for smart contracts. Covers program setup on Immunefi, vulnerability triage, responsible disclosure coordination, bounty payments, and post-disclosure analysis.

  • 1,760 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 3 views
  • Added September 2, 2026
ai-agentsjavascriptgojavabashtestinggitsecuritydocumentation

Works with

  • mcp

Security analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 2 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned September 2, 2026

npx -y skills add a5c-ai/babysitter --skill bug-bounty --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Bug Bounty?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Bug Bounty
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/a5c-ai-bug-bounty-babysitter/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/a5c-ai-bug-bounty-babysitter)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: bug-bounty
description: Bug bounty program management and security disclosure expertise for smart contracts. Covers program setup on Immunefi, vulnerability triage, responsible disclosure coordination, bounty payments, and post-disclosure analysis.
allowed-tools: Read, Grep, Write, Bash, Edit, Glob, WebFetch, WebSearch
graph:
  domains: [domain:security]
  specializations: [specialization:cryptography-blockchain]
  skillAreas: [skill-area:smart-contract-security, skill-area:vulnerability-scanning-remediation, skill-area:incident-response-forensics]
  roles: [role:security-engineer, role:security-risk-analyst]
---

# Bug Bounty/Security Disclosure Skill

Expert management of bug bounty programs and responsible security disclosure for blockchain protocols.

## Capabilities

- **Program Setup**: Configure bug bounty programs on Immunefi and other platforms
- **Scope Definition**: Define assets, severity tiers, and exclusions
- **Vulnerability Triage**: Assess and validate security reports
- **Responsible Disclosure**: Coordinate disclosure timelines and communications
- **Bounty Management**: Calculate and process bounty payments
- **Post-Disclosure**: Conduct post-mortem analysis and lessons learned

## MCP/Tool Integration

| Tool | Purpose | Reference |
|------|---------|-----------|
| **Trail of Bits Skills** | Security analysis, property testing | [building-secure-contracts](https://github.com/trailofbits/skills) |
| **Slither MCP** | Static analysis for validation | [slither-mcp](https://github.com/trailofbits/slither-mcp) |
| **Phalcon MCP** | Transaction analysis | [phalcon-mcp](https://github.com/mark3labs/phalcon-mcp) |

## Bug Bounty Program Setup

### Immunefi Program Structure

```yaml
program:
  name: "Protocol Name"
  website: "https://protocol.xyz"

  assets:
    smart_contracts:
      - type: "Smart Contract"
        target: "0x..."
        severity: "Critical"

    websites:
      - type: "Web Application"
        target: "https://app.protocol.xyz"
        severity: "High"

  severity_levels:
    critical:
      range: "$100,000 - $1,000,000"
      description: "Direct theft of funds, permanent freezing"
    high:
      range: "$10,000 - $100,000"
      description: "Theft requiring user action, temporary freezing"
    medium:
      range: "$1,000 - $10,000"
      description: "Griefing, DoS with medium impact"
    low:
      range: "$100 - $1,000"
      description: "Minor issues, informational"

  exclusions:
    - "Issues in test files"
    - "Third-party dependencies"
    - "Issues requiring admin key compromise"
    - "Front-running issues without significant impact"
```

### Severity Classification

| Severity | Impact | Examples |
|----------|--------|----------|
| **Critical** | Direct fund loss, protocol takeover | Reentrancy draining funds, access control bypass |
| **High** | Significant fund loss, protocol disruption | Oracle manipulation, flash loan attacks |
| **Medium** | Limited fund loss, degraded functionality | Griefing attacks, minor calculation errors |
| **Low** | No fund loss, minor issues | Gas inefficiency, informational findings |

## Vulnerability Triage Workflow

### 1. Initial Assessment

```markdown
## Triage Checklist

- [ ] Report is within program scope
- [ ] Vulnerability is reproducible
- [ ] Impact assessment is accurate
- [ ] No duplicate of existing report
- [ ] Not a known issue or design decision

## Initial Classification

| Field | Value |
|-------|-------|
| Report ID | BB-2024-XXX |
| Submission Date | YYYY-MM-DD |
| Reporter | @handle |
| Asset Affected | Contract/URL |
| Initial Severity | Critical/High/Medium/Low |
| Status | Triaging |
```

### 2. Validation Process

```bash
# Clone and setup test environment
git clone <protocol-repo>
cd protocol

# Create PoC test
forge test --match-test test_VulnerabilityPoC -vvvv

# Run against mainnet fork
forge test --fork-url $MAINNET_RPC --match-test test_VulnerabilityPoC
```

### 3. Severity Adjustment

Consider:
- **Likelihood**: How likely is exploitation?
- **Impact**: What is the maximum damage?
- **Complexity**: What resources are needed?
- **User Interaction**: Does it require victim action?

```
Final Severity = Base Impact - Mitigating Factors + Aggravating Factors
```

## Responsible Disclosure Process

### Timeline

```
Day 0:    Report received
Day 1-3:  Initial triage and acknowledgment
Day 3-7:  Validation and severity confirmation
Day 7-14: Fix development
Day 14-21: Fix review and testing
Day 21-30: Coordinated disclosure preparation
Day 30+:  Public disclosure (if agreed)
```

### Communication Templates

**Acknowledgment:**
```
Subject: [BB-XXXX] Report Acknowledged

Dear Security Researcher,

Thank you for your submission to our bug bounty program. We have received
your report and assigned it reference number BB-XXXX.

Our security team is currently reviewing your submission. We will provide
an initial assessment within 3 business days.

Timeline:
- Initial response: 24-72 hours
- Severity assessment: 3-7 days
- Fix timeline: TBD based on severity

Best regards,
Security Team
```

**Severity Confirmation:**
```
Subject: [BB-XXXX] Severity Assessment Complete

Dear Security Researcher,

After thorough review, we have assessed your vulnerability report:

Severity: [CRITICAL/HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW]
Bounty Range: $X - $Y
Fix Timeline: X days

[Details of assessment]

Next Steps:
1. Fix development (ETA: X days)
2. Fix verification with your input
3. Coordinated disclosure discussion

Best regards,
Security Team
```

## Bounty Calculation

### Factors

```javascript
const bountyCalculation = {
  baseBounty: getSeverityBase(severity), // Based on tier

  adjustments: {
    qualityOfReport: 1.0 - 1.5,    // Well-documented PoC
    impactAccuracy: 0.8 - 1.2,     // Accurate impact assessment
    firstReporter: 1.0,            // First to report
    duplicatePartial: 0.0 - 0.5,   // Partial duplicate
    responsibleBehavior: 1.0 - 1.2 // No public disclosure
  },

  calculate() {
    return this.baseBounty *
           this.adjustments.qualityOfReport *
           this.adjustments.impactAccuracy *
           this.adjustments.responsibleBehavior;
  }
};
```

### Payment Process

1. **Verify Identity**: KYC requirements for large bounties
2. **Payment Method**: Crypto (USDC, ETH) or fiat
3. **Tax Documentation**: W-9 (US) or W-8BEN (non-US)
4. **Confirmation**: Receipt and acknowledgment

## Post-Disclosure Analysis

### Post-Mortem Template

```markdown
# Security Incident Post-Mortem: [Title]

## Summary
- **Date Discovered**: YYYY-MM-DD
- **Date Fixed**: YYYY-MM-DD
- **Severity**: Critical/High/Medium/Low
- **Bounty Paid**: $X

## Root Cause
[Detailed explanation of the vulnerability]

## Timeline
| Time | Event |
|------|-------|
| T+0h | Report received |
| T+2h | Triage complete |
| T+24h | Fix developed |
| T+48h | Fix deployed |
| T+168h | Public disclosure |

## Technical Details
[Code snippets, attack vectors, affected functions]

## Fix Implementation
[How the issue was resolved]

## Lessons Learned
1. [Lesson 1]
2. [Lesson 2]
3. [Lesson 3]

## Process Improvements
- [ ] Improvement 1
- [ ] Improvement 2
```

## Process Integration

This skill integrates with:

- `bug-bounty-program.js` - Full program management process
- `incident-response-exploits.js` - Exploit response coordination
- `smart-contract-security-audit.js` - Pre-launch security review

## Immunefi Best Practices

### Program Configuration

1. **Clear Scope**: List all in-scope assets with addresses
2. **Realistic Bounties**: Competitive with market rates
3. **Response SLA**: Commit to specific timelines
4. **Safe Harbor**: Protect researchers acting in good faith

### Common Issues

| Issue | Solution |
|-------|----------|
| Slow response | Set up triage rotation, clear escalation |
| Scope disputes | Pre-define edge cases in program terms |
| Severity disagreements | Use CVSS scoring, document rationale |
| Payment delays | Pre-fund bounty pool, streamline KYC |

## Security Advisory Format

### GitHub Security Advisory

```markdown
## Summary
[Brief description]

## Severity
[CVSS Score] - [Critical/High/Medium/Low]

## Affected Versions
- >= 1.0.0, < 1.2.3

## Patches
Fixed in version 1.2.3

## Workarounds
[If applicable]

## References
- [Link to fix PR]
- [Related documentation]

## Credits
Thanks to @researcher for responsible disclosure
```

## See Also

- `agents/incident-response/AGENT.md` - Incident response expert
- `smart-contract-security-audit.js` - Security audit process
- `references.md` - Security disclosure resources

Files in this skill

  • README.md4.7 KB
  • SKILL.md8.4 KB

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…