Skip to content
Back to skills

Verification Before Completion

ASecurity

Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing — run verification commands and confirm output before any success claims; evidence before assertions always

  • 36 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 2 views
  • Added May 27, 2026
data-airustgoexpressgit

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned May 27, 2026

npx -y skills add adriannoes/awesome-vibe-coding --skill verification-before-completion --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Verification Before Completion?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Verification Before Completion
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/adriannoes-verification-before-completion/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/adriannoes-verification-before-completion)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: verification-before-completion
description: Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing — run verification commands and confirm output before any success claims; evidence before assertions always
---

# Verification Before Completion

**Source:** [obra/superpowers](https://github.com/obra/superpowers) (MIT)

## Overview

Claiming work is complete without verification is dishonesty, not efficiency.

**Core principle:** Evidence before claims, always.

## The Iron Law

```
NO COMPLETION CLAIMS WITHOUT FRESH VERIFICATION EVIDENCE
```

If you haven't run the verification command in this message, you cannot claim it passes.

## The Gate Function

```
BEFORE claiming any status or expressing satisfaction:

1. IDENTIFY: What command proves this claim?
2. RUN: Execute the FULL command (fresh, complete)
3. READ: Full output, check exit code, count failures
4. VERIFY: Does output confirm the claim?
   - If NO: State actual status with evidence
   - If YES: State claim WITH evidence
5. ONLY THEN: Make the claim

Skip any step = lying, not verifying
```

## Common Failures

| Claim | Requires | Not Sufficient |
|-------|----------|----------------|
| Tests pass | Test command output: 0 failures | Previous run, "should pass" |
| Linter clean | Linter output: 0 errors | Partial check, extrapolation |
| Build succeeds | Build command: exit 0 | Linter passing, logs look good |
| Bug fixed | Test original symptom: passes | Code changed, assumed fixed |
| Regression test works | Red-green cycle verified | Test passes once |
| Requirements met | Line-by-line checklist | Tests passing |

## Red Flags — STOP

- Using "should", "probably", "seems to"
- Expressing satisfaction before verification ("Great!", "Perfect!", "Done!")
- About to commit/push/PR without verification
- Trusting agent success reports
- Relying on partial verification
- **ANY wording implying success without having run verification**

## Key Patterns

**Tests:**
```
✅ [Run test command] [See: 34/34 pass] "All tests pass"
❌ "Should pass now" / "Looks correct"
```

**Build:**
```
✅ [Run build] [See: exit 0] "Build passes"
❌ "Linter passed" (linter doesn't check compilation)
```

**Requirements:**
```
✅ Re-read plan → Create checklist → Verify each → Report gaps or completion
❌ "Tests pass, phase complete"
```

## When To Apply

**ALWAYS before:**
- ANY variation of success/completion claims
- Committing, PR creation, task completion
- Moving to next task

**No shortcuts for verification.** Run the command. Read the output. THEN claim the result.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…