Skip to content
Back to skills

Mmgr Multimodal Reasoning

ASecurity

Evaluate whether generative models possess foundational reasoning capabilities. Develop five-ability framework (physical, logical, 3D spatial, 2D spatial, temporal reasoning) across abstract reasoning, embodied navigation, and physical commonsense benchmarks. Use structured rubric requiring simultaneous satisfaction of all sub-metrics.

  • 6 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 2 views
  • Added September 9, 2026
testinggotestingperformance

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 9, 2026

npx -y skills add ADu2021/skillXiv --skill mmgr-multimodal-reasoning --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Mmgr Multimodal Reasoning?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Mmgr Multimodal Reasoning
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/adu2021-mmgr-multimodal-reasoning/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/adu2021-mmgr-multimodal-reasoning)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: mmgr-multimodal-reasoning
title: "MMGR: Multi-Modal Generative Reasoning Framework for Evaluating Video and Image Models"
version: 0.0.2
engine: skillxiv-v0.0.2-claude-opus-4.6
license: MIT
url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.14691
keywords: [multimodal, reasoning, evaluation, video-generation, benchmark, generative-models]
description: "Evaluate whether generative models possess foundational reasoning capabilities. Develop five-ability framework (physical, logical, 3D spatial, 2D spatial, temporal reasoning) across abstract reasoning, embodied navigation, and physical commonsense benchmarks. Use structured rubric requiring simultaneous satisfaction of all sub-metrics."
---

## Skill Summary

MMGR introduces a comprehensive evaluation framework assessing reasoning capabilities of generative models across five complementary abilities: physical, logical, 3D spatial, 2D spatial, and temporal reasoning. The benchmark operationalizes this framework across three domains—abstract reasoning, embodied navigation, and physical commonsense—using structured rubrics requiring simultaneous satisfaction of all sub-metrics. Human evaluation on 1,853 samples validates findings and reveals critical misalignments between automated VLM assessment and ground-truth performance.

## When To Use

- Evaluating generative models for reasoning capabilities beyond perceptual quality
- Developing benchmarks assessing structured reasoning in video/image generation
- Research exploring what generative models actually understand about the physical world
- Projects requiring comprehensive reasoning evaluation beyond standard metrics

## When NOT To Use

- Simple text-to-image quality benchmarking (too comprehensive for basic use cases)
- Real-time model evaluation where benchmark overhead is prohibitive
- Domains where simpler metrics already adequately capture model capabilities
- Scenarios focused solely on fidelity without reasoning assessment

## Core Technique

The framework consists of three integrated components:

**1. Five-Ability Reasoning Framework**
Evaluates generative models across:
- Physical Reasoning: intuitive physics and object dynamics
- Logical Reasoning: abstract rule-following and symbolic manipulation
- 3D Spatial Reasoning: volumetric environment understanding
- 2D Spatial Reasoning: planar layout and composition
- Temporal Reasoning: causality and event sequencing

**2. Benchmark Structure**
Operationalizes framework across three complementary domains:
- Abstract Reasoning: Maze, Sudoku, ARC-AGI, Math (testing logic and 2D spatial skills)
- Embodied Navigation: 3D navigation, egocentric views, top-down planning (assessing spatial and temporal coherence)
- Physical Commonsense: fundamental physics concepts and sports scenarios (evaluating intuitive physics understanding)

**3. Structured Evaluation Rubric**
Unlike partial success metrics, use "a structured rubric requiring simultaneous satisfaction of all sub-metrics" to properly assess reasoning correctness. Combine automated evaluation with human validation across 1,853 test samples.

## Implementation Notes

Design benchmark tasks requiring multi-ability reasoning. Implement structured rubrics checking all sub-metrics simultaneously. Conduct human evaluation to calibrate automated metrics. Use findings to identify which reasoning abilities generative models possess or lack.

## References

- Original paper: MMGR (Dec 2025)
- Generative model evaluation frameworks
- Reasoning benchmarks for vision models

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…