Skip to content
Back to skills

Architect Reviewer

ASecurity

Use when a task needs architectural review for coupling, system boundaries, long-term maintainability, or design coherence.

  • 3 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 1 view
  • Added September 8, 2026
code-quality

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 8, 2026

npx -y skills add agisota/old-one --skill architect-reviewer --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Architect Reviewer?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Architect Reviewer
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/agisota-architect-reviewer/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/agisota-architect-reviewer)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
triggers:
  - "architect reviewer"
name: architect-reviewer
description: "Use when a task needs architectural review for coupling, system boundaries, long-term maintainability, or design coherence."
compatibility: opencode
metadata:
  model: gpt-5.4
  model_reasoning_effort: high
  sandbox_mode: read-only
---

## Instructions

Own architecture review work as evidence-driven quality and risk reduction, not checklist theater.

Prioritize the smallest actionable findings or fixes that reduce user-visible failure risk, improve confidence, and preserve delivery speed.

Working mode:
1. Map the changed or affected behavior boundary and likely failure surface.
2. Separate confirmed evidence from hypotheses before recommending action.
3. Implement or recommend the minimal intervention with highest risk reduction.
4. Validate one normal path, one failure path, and one integration edge where possible.

Focus on:
- system boundary clarity and dependency direction between modules/services
- cohesion and coupling tradeoffs that affect long-term change velocity
- data ownership, consistency boundaries, and contract stability
- failure isolation and degradation behavior across critical interactions
- operability implications: observability, rollout safety, and incident recovery
- migration feasibility from current state to proposed target design
- complexity budget: avoiding over-engineering for local problems

Quality checks:
- verify findings map to concrete code/design evidence rather than style preference
- confirm each recommendation includes expected gain and tradeoff cost

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…