Skip to content
Back to skills

Performance Goal

ASecurity

Run an evaluator-gated performance optimization workflow over Codex goal mode with durable OMX artifacts and safe goal handoffs.

  • 3 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 2 views
  • Added September 8, 2026
testinggoshellperformance

Works with

  • cli

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 8, 2026

npx -y skills add agisota/old-one --skill performance-goal --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Performance Goal?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Performance Goal
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/agisota-performance-goal/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/agisota-performance-goal)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: performance-goal
description: "Run an evaluator-gated performance optimization workflow over Codex goal mode with durable OMX artifacts and safe goal handoffs."
---

# Performance Goal Workflow

Use this skill when a user asks OMX to optimize performance and wants a goal-oriented loop rather than a one-off review.

## Contract

- OMX owns durable workflow state under `.omx/goals/performance/<slug>/`.
- Codex goal mode owns only the active-thread focus/accounting primitive.
- Shell commands do **not** mutate hidden Codex goal state. They write artifacts and emit model-facing handoff text.
- No optimization work may start until an evaluator command and pass/fail contract exist.
- Do not call `update_goal({status: "complete"})` until the evaluator has a passing checkpoint and a completion audit proves the objective is done; then call `get_goal` again and pass that fresh snapshot to `omx performance-goal complete --codex-goal-json`.

## CLI

Create the workflow and evaluator contract:

```sh
omx performance-goal create \
  --objective "Reduce CLI startup latency by 20%" \
  --evaluator-command "npm run perf:startup" \
  --evaluator-contract "PASS when p95 latency improves by 20% and regression tests pass" \
  --slug startup-latency
```

Emit the Codex goal handoff:

```sh
omx performance-goal start --slug startup-latency
```

Record evaluator evidence:

```sh
omx performance-goal checkpoint --slug startup-latency --status pass --evidence "benchmark + tests passed"
omx performance-goal checkpoint --slug startup-latency --status fail --evidence "benchmark regressed"
omx performance-goal checkpoint --slug startup-latency --status blocked --evidence "missing fixture"
```

Complete only after a passing checkpoint:

```sh
omx performance-goal complete --slug startup-latency --evidence "final evaluator evidence" --codex-goal-json <get_goal-json-or-path>
```

## Agent Loop

1. Run `omx performance-goal create` if no workflow exists.
2. Run `omx performance-goal start` and follow the handoff:
   - call `get_goal`;
   - call `create_goal` only when no active goal exists and the objective is explicit;
   - work only against the evaluator contract;
   - after evaluator pass and completion audit, call `update_goal({status: "complete"})`, call `get_goal` again, and pass that snapshot to `omx performance-goal complete --codex-goal-json`;
3. Optimize in small reversible patches.
4. Run the evaluator and related regression tests.
5. Record each pass/fail/blocker with `checkpoint`.
6. Complete only when the pass artifact exists and no required work remains.

## Completion Gate

A performance goal is incomplete unless `.omx/goals/performance/<slug>/state.json` contains a `lastValidation.status` of `pass` and `omx performance-goal complete` receives a matching complete Codex `get_goal` snapshot via `--codex-goal-json`. Passing ordinary tests alone is not sufficient unless they are the declared evaluator contract.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…