Capture table and column-level lineage to answer impact and provenance questions before changes and during incidents. Use when planning schema changes, debugging bad numbers, or building data-platform trust.
Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Data Lineage?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/amey-thakur-data-lineage)
---
name: data-lineage
description: Capture table and column-level lineage to answer impact and provenance questions before changes and during incidents. Use when planning schema changes, debugging bad numbers, or building data-platform trust.
---
# Data lineage
Lineage answers two questions under pressure: "if I change this, what
breaks?" (impact) and "this number is wrong, where did it come from?"
(provenance). Capture it automatically or it will not exist when asked.
## Method
1. **Capture from code, not documentation.** Parse lineage from the
SQL and pipeline definitions themselves (dbt manifest, warehouse
query logs, OpenLineage events from orchestrators): generated
lineage stays current by construction. Hand-drawn diagrams are
wrong within a month and dangerous within two.
2. **Get table-level everywhere, column-level where it pays.**
Table-level answers most impact questions cheaply. Column-level
matters on the money paths: PII propagation (see pii-handling),
metric definitions (which columns feed "revenue"), and
breaking-change analysis for schema-evolution. Full column
lineage on everything is expensive to maintain; target it.
3. **Extend to the edges.** Lineage that stops at the warehouse
boundary misses the point of origin (producing services, CDC
streams; see change-data-capture) and the point of impact
(dashboards, ML features, reverse-ETL to CRMs). The consumer edge
is what turns "table X is late" into "these 3 dashboards and this
model are stale" (see data-quality-checks alert context).
4. **Wire it into the change workflow.** Before merging a model or
schema change, CI posts the downstream impact list (direct and
transitive consumers) on the PR; notify affected owners for
anything breaking (see schema-evolution). Impact analysis at
review time is lineage earning its keep; a graph nobody consults
is a screensaver.
5. **Use it in incident triage, both directions.** Bad number:
walk upstream to find the first anomalous node (pair with quality
check results to bisect fast). Bad source partition: walk
downstream to scope the blast radius, invalidate/rebuild affected
tables in dependency order (see data-pipeline-design backfills),
and notify consumers proactively.
6. **Attach governance metadata to the graph.** Ownership, data
classification (PII/confidential), retention class (see
data-retention) travel with lineage: "where does PII flow" and
"what feeds the regulator's report" become queries instead of
quarterly archaeology projects.
## Boundaries
- Lineage shows structure, not correctness: a fully-lineaged wrong
transformation is still wrong (see data-quality-checks and
warehouse-modeling for the semantics).
- Runtime dynamic SQL, notebooks, and spreadsheet exports escape
automated capture; either bring those flows into managed tooling or
accept documented blind spots.
- Buying a catalog does not create lineage culture; the integrations
into CI and incident runbooks are where the value lives.