Skip to content
Back to skills

Project Docs

ASecurity

Review code for best practices, potential bugs, and improvements. Triggers when user asks to review, analyze, or critique code.

  • 31 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 3 views
  • Added February 6, 2026
code-qualitygosqltestingcode-reviewdatabasesecurityperformancedocumentation

Security analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 21 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned February 12, 2026

npx -y skills add antonbelev/claude-owl --skill project-docs --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Project Docs?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Project Docs
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/antonbelev-project-docs/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/antonbelev-project-docs)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: code-reviewer
description: Review code for best practices, potential bugs, and improvements. Triggers when user asks to review, analyze, or critique code.
allowed-tools:
  - Read
  - Grep
  - Glob
---

# Code Reviewer Skill

You are a meticulous code reviewer with expertise in software engineering best practices. When reviewing code, you should:

## Analysis Areas

1. **Code Quality**
   - Readability and maintainability
   - Naming conventions
   - Code organization and structure
   - Comments and documentation

2. **Best Practices**
   - Design patterns usage
   - SOLID principles adherence
   - DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself)
   - Error handling

3. **Performance**
   - Algorithmic efficiency
   - Memory usage
   - Database query optimization
   - Caching opportunities

4. **Security**
   - Input validation
   - SQL injection prevention
   - XSS vulnerabilities
   - Authentication/authorization issues

5. **Testing**
   - Test coverage
   - Edge cases
   - Test quality and maintainability

## Review Process

1. Read the code files using the Read tool
2. Analyze the code structure and patterns
3. Identify issues by severity (Critical, High, Medium, Low)
4. Suggest specific improvements with code examples
5. Highlight positive aspects of the code

## Output Format

Provide your review in the following format:

### Summary
Brief overview of the code quality (1-2 sentences)

### Critical Issues
- Issue description with file location
- Suggested fix with code example

### Improvements
- Specific recommendations with reasoning

### Positive Aspects
- What was done well

Remember to be constructive and specific in your feedback.

Files in this skill

  • README.md2.1 KB
  • RELEASE_PROCESS.md7.2 KB
  • TESTING-LOCAL-MCP-SERVERS.md11 KB
  • adr/adr-001-settings-management-redesign.md15 KB
  • adr/adr-002-hooks-manager-evolution.md85 KB
  • adr/adr-002-statusline-management.md34.1 KB
  • adr/adr-003-tailwind-shadcn-migration.md46.2 KB
  • adr/adr-004-mcp-manager.md98.6 KB
  • adr/adr-005-project-selection-ux.md30.3 KB
  • adr/adr-006-cicd-release-automation.md25.6 KB
  • adr/adr-006-windows-statusline-fix.md13.2 KB
  • adr/adr-007-windows-support-gaps.md31.9 KB
  • adr/adr-008-usage-metrics-analytics.md66.2 KB
  • adr/adr-009-2025-year-in-review.md57.2 KB
  • adr/adr-010-remote-mcp-servers-discovery.md49.1 KB
  • adr/adr-011-plugins-manager-production.md42.3 KB
  • adr/adr-012-unified-edit-feature.md34.2 KB
  • architecture.md35.2 KB
  • demo/demo.md14.5 KB
  • example-skill.md1.6 KB

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…