Skip to content
Back to skills

Migration Patterns

ASecurity

Safe schema-migration patterns for systems under live traffic — expand/contract, backfill, double-write, shadow-read, online DDL. Use when authoring, reviewing, or sequencing a migration that can't take a maintenance window.

  • 2 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 1 view
  • Added May 26, 2026
databasesgosql

Works with

  • cli

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned May 27, 2026

npx -y skills add atuljha23/holocron --skill migration-patterns --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Migration Patterns?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Migration Patterns
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/atuljha23-migration-patterns/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/atuljha23-migration-patterns)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: migration-patterns
description: Safe schema-migration patterns for systems under live traffic — expand/contract, backfill, double-write, shadow-read, online DDL. Use when authoring, reviewing, or sequencing a migration that can't take a maintenance window.
---

# Migration patterns

Assume: the service is running, writes are arriving, you cannot take a maintenance window. Most production migrations live here.

## The universal rule

**Never couple a schema change to a code change in the same deploy.** They fail independently, and you need each to be reversible independently.

## Expand → Migrate → Contract

The safe three-phase dance for any non-trivial change:

1. **Expand** — add the new shape alongside the old. No caller depends on it yet.
2. **Migrate** — move data to the new shape. Switch readers. Switch writers. Backfill anything left.
3. **Contract** — drop the old shape once nothing reads or writes it for a cooling-off period.

Each phase is a separate deploy. Each is independently revertable.

## Common change patterns

### Add a column
- **Safe**: `ALTER TABLE ... ADD COLUMN ... NULL`. No lock (or brief, depending on engine).
- **Danger**: `NOT NULL` with no default on a large table — full-table rewrite, long lock. Use a default (cheap if metadata-only in your engine) or expand/migrate/contract: add nullable → backfill → add NOT NULL constraint.

### Drop a column
- Ship code that stops reading it. Deploy. Wait a release.
- Ship code that stops writing it. Deploy. Wait a release.
- Drop the column.
- Never reverse this order.

### Rename a column
- Effectively: add new → dual-write → backfill → switch reads → stop writing old → drop old.
- Never `ALTER TABLE ... RENAME COLUMN` while code is live. Callers break.

### Change column type
- Add a new column with the target type.
- Dual-write (writers write both).
- Backfill the new column.
- Switch readers to the new column.
- Stop writing the old.
- Drop the old.

### Add an index on a large table
- **Postgres**: `CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY` — no table lock. Monitor for failure.
- **MySQL**: online DDL since 5.6 for most index adds. Check `ALGORITHM=INPLACE, LOCK=NONE`.
- Never just `CREATE INDEX` on a hot table without `CONCURRENTLY` / online algorithm.

### Add a foreign key
- Add the column first, without the constraint.
- Backfill valid values.
- Add the constraint `NOT VALID` (Postgres) so new rows are checked.
- `VALIDATE CONSTRAINT` later during low traffic.

### Partitioning
- Create the new partitioned table alongside.
- Shadow-write to both.
- Backfill.
- Switch reads.
- Drop the old.

## Backfill patterns

- **Batch in chunks** by primary key range. Size the chunk so a single chunk finishes in ~1s.
- **Sleep** between chunks. Leave room for user traffic and replication lag.
- **Checkpoint** progress in a table or file; a restart should resume, not re-scan.
- **Track replica lag** on Postgres/MySQL. If lag climbs, slow down.
- Avoid `UPDATE ... WHERE condition` on the whole table in one shot. It will bite.

Sketch:

```sql
-- in a loop, with checkpointing and sleep
UPDATE users
SET email_lower = LOWER(email)
WHERE id > $last_id
  AND id <= $last_id + 10000
  AND email_lower IS NULL;
```

## Dual-write safely

When writers must update both old and new:

- Apply the write to both inside the same transaction if they're in the same DB.
- If cross-store, use an outbox table — write to outbox in the transaction, publish async.
- Reject writes where the dual-write fails, unless the business accepts loss on the new path during rollout.

## Shadow-read for confidence

Before switching reads:

- Run both queries (old and new), compare results, log mismatches.
- Fix mismatches in the backfill, not in the read path.
- Only cut over when mismatch rate ≈ 0 for a sustained window.

## Reversibility

Every migration has a reverse. Write both up and down migrations. For destructive ops (drops, renames), the reverse might be "restore from backup" — state that explicitly, and get a snapshot before you run it.

## Checklist before you run it

- [ ] Ran on a restored copy of prod-sized data? Measured duration.
- [ ] Identified locking behavior on this engine, for this size.
- [ ] Backup / snapshot present and verified.
- [ ] Rollback path documented.
- [ ] Oncall notified. Deploy freeze if needed.
- [ ] Feature flag / flagged query gate, so readers/writers can switch without redeploy.

## Anti-patterns

- Migrations mixed into feature PRs. Can't revert independently.
- `DELETE FROM ... WHERE ...` to "clean up" at scale — use batched archival instead.
- `CREATE INDEX` without `CONCURRENTLY` on a live Postgres table — locks writes.
- `SELECT *` in backfill queries — read only what you need.
- Running a migration in the ORM's auto-migrate mode in production. Use explicit migration files, versioned and reviewed.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…