Skip to content
Back to skills

E2e

ASecurity

Write and run Playwright e2e tests in ayunis-core-e2e. Use when writing, running, or debugging browser tests; when a browser journey or system boundary changes and lower-level tests do not sufficiently prove it; or when the High-Risk Path affects user-facing behavior. Not automatic for copy, isolated visual-only work, or behavior already proven at a lower layer.

  • 33 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 1 view
  • Added September 20, 2026
code-qualitygobashdockerdebugginggitapifrontendbackend

Works with

  • cli
  • api

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 28, 2026

npx -y skills add ayunis-core/ayunis-core --skill e2e --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of E2e?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for E2e
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/ayunis-core-e2e/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/ayunis-core-e2e)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: e2e
description: Write and run Playwright e2e tests in ayunis-core-e2e. Use when writing, running, or debugging browser tests; when a browser journey or system boundary changes and lower-level tests do not sufficiently prove it; or when the High-Risk Path affects user-facing behavior. Not automatic for copy, isolated visual-only work, or behavior already proven at a lower layer.
---

# E2E Tests — ayunis-core-e2e

Browser tests against the real stack with deterministic LLM mocks. When the
Proportional Workflow requires browser coverage, the change is **done when its
focused e2e spec passes**. Use E2E for journeys and boundaries that lower-level
tests cannot credibly prove; do not add an E2E test merely because a change is
visible to a user. Architecture and history: `ayunis-core-e2e/PLAN.md`.

## Stack setup (once per session)

Tests need a running `./dev` stack in **e2e mode** plus the global seed:

```bash
./dev up --slot 2 --e2e                    # from the repo root; pick a free slot
(cd ayunis-core-backend && pnpm seed)
```

- `--e2e` writes `MOCK_INFERENCE=true` (all LLM providers become mocks that
  reply `{provider}::{model}`) and `ORG_EVENTS_WEBHOOK_URL=` (no outbound
  webhooks) into `.env.dev`.
- Check slot availability first: `docker ps --format '{{.Names}}' | grep ayunis-dev`.
  Never touch someone else's running slot.
- **Env-change gotcha**: if the stack was already running without `--e2e`,
  the backend must fully restart (`./dev down && ./dev up --e2e`). A
  `nest --watch` respawn is NOT enough — the watch supervisor caches env
  (appsignal.cjs preloads dotenv) and children inherit it.

## Running

```bash
pnpm --filter ayunis-core-e2e test                       # full suite
pnpm --filter ayunis-core-e2e test --grep "<pattern>"    # one spec/test
pnpm --filter ayunis-core-e2e run lint                   # selector/flake policy
pnpm --filter ayunis-core-e2e run typecheck
pnpm --filter ayunis-core-e2e run openapi:generate       # refresh generated API client
```

Non-default slot: `E2E_BASE_URL=http://localhost:30N1 pnpm --filter ...`
(API and Mailcatcher URLs derive from the slot; see `src/config.ts`).

Temporary PR-review screenshots/GIFs use `pnpm --filter ayunis-core-e2e run pr-media:capture`. Scene definitions are not committed to product branches; use the `pr-media` skill to put `.pr-media/scenes.ts` on the disposable `pr-media/pr-<n>` branch for the PR.

For visually meaningful frontend changes, use the `pr-media` skill when the result materially helps reviewers evaluate the PR. Include only the viewports and interactions needed to demonstrate the change.

## Fixtures — import from `src/fixtures/test`, never `@playwright/test`

```ts
import { test, expect } from '../../src/fixtures/test';
```

- `org` (worker-scoped) — every worker gets its own org created via the API:
  admin user (`org.admin.email` / `org.admin.password`), email confirmed,
  one permitted language model set as org default (`org.defaultModel`),
  welcome video + personalization wizard dismissed. Tests in a worker share
  it; workers never collide — this is what makes `fullyParallel` safe.
- `page` — starts authenticated as the worker org's admin. Specs that test
  login/registration opt out:
  `test.use({ storageState: { cookies: [], origins: [] } })`.
- `api` — authenticated `APIRequestContext` for setup and side-effect
  assertions (e.g. assert a toggle persisted via `GET`), not for the
  behaviour under test.
- `publicApi` — unauthenticated `APIRequestContext` for public-endpoint
  behaviour against the backend API URL.
- `mail` — Mailcatcher client; `mail.extractLinkToken(email, '/accept-invite')`
  polls for the email and pulls the token from the frontend link.
- `pageErrorGuard` (auto) — any uncaught page error fails the test. Opt out
  per test with `test.use({ allowPageErrors: true })` only with a comment why.
- Chat flow helpers (`src/flows/chat.flow.ts`): `sendMessage`, `startThread`
  (returns threadId), `sidebarThreadItem`.
- Mock replies are assertable:
  `expect(...).toContainText(`${org.defaultModel.provider}::${org.defaultModel.name}`)`
  proves routing end to end.

## Selector policy (ESLint-enforced)

- **Only `getByTestId` / `getByRole`.** Text selectors are banned: the UI
  defaults to German and Chrome auto-translate can rewrite DOM text.
- No `page.waitForTimeout`, no `{ force: true }` — wait on locators or
  `expect.poll`.
- Missing a stable hook? **Add a `data-testid` to the frontend in the same
  PR** — that is part of building the feature, not test scaffolding.
  Naming: `<feature>-<element>[-<action>]`, kebab-case (`register-email`,
  `invite-accept-submit`, `confirmation-confirm`).

## Source layout

```text
src/fixtures/       Playwright fixture composition only
src/clients/generated/ Orval-generated backend API client (do not edit)
src/clients/api/    Semantic wrappers around generated endpoints
src/clients/*.ts    External clients/adapters, e.g. Mailcatcher + Playwright mutator
src/factories/      Test data creation composed from clients
src/flows/          Reusable UI journeys/page interactions
src/assertions/     Shared assertion helpers when repetition appears
tests/<domain>/     Product journeys, one journey per spec file
```

## Scope and stopping rule

E2E tests prove the smallest set of critical browser-to-backend journeys needed
for the acceptance criteria. The default stopping point is one representative
happy path for each materially distinct journey. Add another E2E case only when
it proves a high-risk outcome that depends on an integration boundary, such as
authentication, authorization, persistence, email, uploads, or routing, or when
it prevents a regression that lower-level tests could not catch.

Do not exhaustively cover validation permutations, domain edge cases,
role/provider combinations, responsive variants, or implementation details in
E2E. Put those at the closest lower layer: unit, integration, API, or component
tests. Do not duplicate a journey an existing E2E test already proves.

Access-control changes are the exception: follow the repository instructions
for distinct principals and assert denied-before, grant, then allowed-after.

## Adding a spec for a new feature

1. One user journey per file under `tests/<domain>/`. Copy the closest
   reference:
   - CRUD + dialogs: `tests/chat/thread-crud.spec.ts` (rename/delete via shared dialogs)
   - Email-driven flow: `tests/auth/invite.spec.ts`, `tests/auth/password-reset.spec.ts`
   - Public form journey: `tests/auth/register.spec.ts`
   - Admin mutation with API assertion: `tests/admin/instructions.spec.ts`
2. Prefer generated endpoint calls behind `src/clients/api/`; do not hardcode backend routes in specs. Compose test data in `src/factories/`, reusable UI journeys in `src/flows/`, and assert behaviour through the UI.
3. Unique data per test (`Date.now()` suffixes) — tests share the worker org.
4. Run the focused spec, lint, and typecheck. Run the full suite when the change affects shared fixtures, flows, clients, or broad behavior; otherwise rely on CI for the full-suite gate.

## Debugging a failure

1. Read the failure output, then **look at the screenshot** —
   `test-results/<test>/test-failed-1.png` (readable directly).
2. `test-results/<test>/error-context.md` has the accessibility snapshot at
   failure time; `trace.zip` has the full network/DOM timeline
   (`pnpm exec playwright show-trace <path>`; the `*.network` files inside
   are JSON if headless analysis is needed).
3. Backend side: `./dev logs backend --tail 200` (or `.dev/slot-N/backend.log`).
4. A request stuck "in flight" on a cold dev stack is usually a Vite
   on-demand transform — the warmup project (`tests/setup/warmup.setup.ts`)
   should prevent it; suspect real bugs before suspecting the suite.
5. If the app is genuinely broken, that's the suite working: report the bug,
   keep the intended behaviour as `test.fixme` with a comment, and reference
   it (pattern: "deletes the currently viewed thread" in `tests/chat/thread-crud.spec.ts`).

## Gotchas

- The seeded fixture (`admin@demo.local`, Usage Org users) is shared global
  state — specs that mutate it don't parallelize; prefer worker orgs. Rich
  seeded scenarios (usage limits, academy states) are Phase 5 (`@seeded-org`).
- Local runs cap at 4 workers and disable video deliberately (CPU contention
  causes 30s-timeout cascades) — don't raise them to "speed things up".
- CI (`.github/workflows/e2e-tests.yml`) builds backend/frontend in upstream
  jobs, downloads those `dist` artifacts into the e2e job, and serves the
  **built** frontend from the backend (same origin, port 3000) —
  dev-server-only behaviour won't reproduce there.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…