Assesses going-concern viability with 13-week cash flow models, liquidity runway, and critical vendor analysis. Use when evaluating liquidity crises, building 13-week models, or assessing near-term solvency.
Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Conducting Liquidity And Viability Analysis?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/casemark-conducting-liquidity-and-viability-analysis)
---
name: conducting-liquidity-and-viability-analysis
language: en
description: Assesses going-concern viability with 13-week cash flow models, liquidity runway, and critical vendor analysis. Use when evaluating liquidity crises, building 13-week models, or assessing near-term solvency.
tags:
- process
- distressed-and-restructuring
metadata:
author: casemark
practice_areas:
- Restructuring
- Distressed Investing
- Turnaround
document_types:
- Process Documentation
skill_modes:
- Process Management
---
# Conducting Liquidity And Viability Analysis
## When To Use
- Building or reviewing a 13-week cash flow (TWCF) model for a distressed company
- Evaluating whether a business can fund operations through a restructuring timeline
- Assessing liquidity runway to determine filing urgency or need for DIP financing
- Identifying critical vendors whose non-payment would trigger operational shutdown
- Supporting going-concern opinions, lender negotiations, or board-level solvency decisions
## Inputs To Gather
- **Bank statements and cash ledger** — trailing 13 weeks minimum; 26 weeks preferred for seasonality
- **A/R aging schedule** — with collection history and concentration by customer
- **A/P aging schedule** — including past-due balances and vendor payment terms
- **Revolver/ABL borrowing base certificate** — current availability, reserves, and eligibility criteria
- **Debt service schedule** — principal, interest, fees, and covenant compliance dates
- **Payroll registers** — by pay period, including taxes, benefits, and contractor payments
- **Capital expenditure commitments** — contractual and discretionary, with deferral feasibility
- **Intercompany funding flows** — if multi-entity, map cash pooling and restricted subsidiaries
- **Material contracts list** — leases, supply agreements, and any minimum purchase obligations
## Workflow
1. **Establish the cash baseline**
- Reconcile opening cash across all accounts (operating, restricted, escrow)
- Identify trapped cash in foreign subsidiaries or restricted accounts
- Confirm revolver availability net of reserves, letters of credit, and borrowing base limits
2. **Build the 13-week cash flow model**
- Use a direct-method (receipts and disbursements) format — not indirect/accrual
- Week 1–2: populate from known scheduled payments and confirmed receivables
- Weeks 3–6: use rolling historical conversion rates for A/R and A/P
- Weeks 7–13: apply trend-based or management-forecast assumptions with clear labels
- Segregate operating cash flow from restructuring-related professional fees and costs
- Model revolver draws/repayments dynamically based on weekly net cash position
3. **Stress-test and scenario the model**
- **Base case**: management forecast with historical adjustment
- **Downside case**: 10–20% revenue haircut, accelerated payables, delayed collections
- **Liquidity crisis case**: loss of top customer or key supplier, revolver freeze
- Identify the week where each scenario breaches minimum cash or triggers covenant default
4. **Perform critical vendor analysis**
- Classify vendors into tiers: (1) sole-source/operational necessity, (2) important but substitutable, (3) discretionary
- For Tier 1 vendors, assess: lead time for alternatives, contractual cure periods, lien exposure
- Estimate the cost of vendor defection (production stoppage, lost revenue, substitute pricing)
- Flag vendors with cross-default or setoff rights against receivables
5. **Assess going-concern viability**
- Calculate liquidity runway in weeks under each scenario
- Determine if the company can fund: (a) ordinary operations, (b) restructuring costs, (c) adequate protection payments simultaneously
- Evaluate whether a consensual out-of-court process is feasible or if a filing is required to access DIP financing, the automatic stay, or Section 363 sale process [VERIFY — jurisdiction-specific filing considerations and local rules]
- Identify specific triggers that would move the timeline forward (e.g., vendor acceleration, lender sweep, covenant breach date)
6. **Document assumptions and sensitivities**
- Create an assumptions page listing every conversion rate, growth factor, and timing assumption
- Flag which assumptions have the highest cash impact if wrong (tornado chart or sensitivity table)
- Note all data gaps and their estimated materiality
## Output
- **13-Week Cash Flow Model** — weekly receipts and disbursements with beginning/ending cash, revolver balance, and minimum liquidity line
- **Scenario Summary Table** — side-by-side comparison of base, downside, and crisis cases showing the week liquidity is exhausted
- **Critical Vendor Matrix** — tiered vendor list with sole-source flags, estimated switching cost, and recommended payment priority
- **Liquidity Runway Assessment** — narrative memo stating weeks of runway under each scenario, key triggers, and recommended next steps (e.g., engage DIP lenders, prepare first-day motions, negotiate forbearance)
- **Assumptions and Sensitivity Log** — tabular list of all model inputs with source, confidence level, and cash impact range
## Quality Checks
- Confirm the TWCF beginning cash ties to the most recent bank statement — zero tolerance for unexplained variances
- Verify that total 13-week disbursements are cross-checked against trailing actuals (±10% variance requires explanation)
- Ensure revolver mechanics reflect actual credit agreement terms (borrowing base formula, reserves, dominion triggers) [VERIFY — confirm against executed credit agreement]
- Validate that critical vendor tier assignments have been reviewed against supply chain and operations teams — not solely from financial data
- Check that the downside scenario assumptions are genuinely adverse, not a marginal trim of the base case
- Confirm professional fee estimates reflect actual engagement letters and anticipated restructuring scope
- Flag any week where minimum operating cash falls below a two-week payroll coverage threshold