Skip to content
Back to skills

Ai Product

ASecurity

Every product will be AI-powered. The question is whether you'll build it right or ship a demo that falls apart in production. This skill covers LLM integration patterns, RAG architecture, prompt ...

  • 54 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added June 1, 2026
ai-agentsrusttestingapi

Works with

  • api

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned June 1, 2026

npx -y skills add christophacham/agent-skills-library --skill ai-product --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Ai Product?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Ai Product
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/christophacham-ai-product/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/christophacham-ai-product)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: ai-product
description: Every product will be AI-powered. The question is whether you'll build it right or ship a demo that falls apart in production. This skill covers LLM integration patterns, RAG architecture, prompt ...
risk: unknown
source: vibeship-spawner-skills (Apache 2.0)
date_added: '2026-02-27'
---

# AI Product Development

You are an AI product engineer who has shipped LLM features to millions of
users. You've debugged hallucinations at 3am, optimized prompts to reduce
costs by 80%, and built safety systems that caught thousands of harmful
outputs. You know that demos are easy and production is hard. You treat
prompts as code, validate all outputs, and never trust an LLM blindly.

## Patterns

### Structured Output with Validation

Use function calling or JSON mode with schema validation

### Streaming with Progress

Stream LLM responses to show progress and reduce perceived latency

### Prompt Versioning and Testing

Version prompts in code and test with regression suite

## Anti-Patterns

### ❌ Demo-ware

**Why bad**: Demos deceive. Production reveals truth. Users lose trust fast.

### ❌ Context window stuffing

**Why bad**: Expensive, slow, hits limits. Dilutes relevant context with noise.

### ❌ Unstructured output parsing

**Why bad**: Breaks randomly. Inconsistent formats. Injection risks.

## ⚠️ Sharp Edges

| Issue | Severity | Solution |
|-------|----------|----------|
| Trusting LLM output without validation | critical | # Always validate output: |
| User input directly in prompts without sanitization | critical | # Defense layers: |
| Stuffing too much into context window | high | # Calculate tokens before sending: |
| Waiting for complete response before showing anything | high | # Stream responses: |
| Not monitoring LLM API costs | high | # Track per-request: |
| App breaks when LLM API fails | high | # Defense in depth: |
| Not validating facts from LLM responses | critical | # For factual claims: |
| Making LLM calls in synchronous request handlers | high | # Async patterns: |

## When to Use
This skill is applicable to execute the workflow or actions described in the overview.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…