Use when performing error budget review — guides teams through a structured
review of their error budget consumption against defined SLOs. This template
helps SRE teams assess reliability performance, identify budget burn patterns,
and make data-driven decisions about feature velocity versus reliability
investment.
Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Error Budget Review?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/cloudthinker-ai-error-budget-review)
---
name: error-budget-review
enabled: true
description: |
Use when performing error budget review — guides teams through a structured
review of their error budget consumption against defined SLOs. This template
helps SRE teams assess reliability performance, identify budget burn patterns,
and make data-driven decisions about feature velocity versus reliability
investment.
required_connections:
- prefix: monitoring
label: "Monitoring Platform"
- prefix: slo-tracker
label: "SLO Tracking Tool"
config_fields:
- key: service_name
label: "Service Name"
required: true
placeholder: "e.g., checkout-api"
- key: review_window
label: "Review Window"
required: true
placeholder: "e.g., 30 days"
- key: slo_target
label: "SLO Target (%)"
required: true
placeholder: "e.g., 99.9"
features:
- SLO_MANAGEMENT
- ERROR_BUDGET
- SRE_OPS
---
# Error Budget Review
## Phase 1: Budget Status Assessment
Gather current error budget data for the review window.
1. Record SLO and error budget status:
- [ ] Current SLO target: ___%
- [ ] Error budget total (minutes of allowed downtime): ___
- [ ] Error budget consumed: ___%
- [ ] Error budget remaining: ___%
- [ ] Days remaining in the window: ___
2. Burn rate analysis:
- [ ] Current burn rate (budget consumed per day): ___
- [ ] Projected budget at end of window: ___%
- [ ] Is the current burn rate sustainable? Y/N
## Phase 2: Incident and Degradation Review
Catalog events that consumed error budget.
| Date | Event Description | Duration (min) | Budget Consumed (%) | Root Cause Category | Preventable? |
|------|-------------------|----------------|---------------------|---------------------|--------------|
| | | | | | |
**Root Cause Categories:** Infrastructure, Deployment, Dependency, Configuration, Capacity, Unknown
## Phase 3: Budget Burn Decision Matrix
| Budget Status | Action |
|---------------|--------|
| >50% remaining | Continue normal feature velocity. No restrictions. |
| 25-50% remaining | Increase review rigor. Require rollback plans for all deployments. |
| 10-25% remaining | Reduce deployment frequency. Prioritize reliability work. |
| <10% remaining | Feature freeze. All engineering effort on reliability. |
| Exhausted | Full freeze. Escalate to leadership. Conduct postmortem on budget exhaustion. |
## Phase 4: Trend Analysis
- [ ] Compare budget consumption to previous 3 review windows
- [ ] Identify recurring root cause categories
- [ ] Assess whether SLO targets are appropriately set
- [ ] Evaluate if measurement methodology is accurate
## Phase 5: Recommendations
1. For each top budget consumer:
- [ ] Define preventive action
- [ ] Assign owner
- [ ] Set target completion date
- [ ] Define expected budget impact
## Counter-Rationalizations
| Shortcut | Counter | Why |
|----------|---------|-----|
| "We can skip some steps for this case" | Adapt the workflow steps, don't skip them | Skipped steps are where incidents and oversights originate |
| "The user seems to already know what to do" | Complete all workflow phases with the user | The workflow catches blind spots that experience alone misses |
| "This is a minor case, full process is overkill" | Scale the process down, don't turn it off | Minor cases become major when unstructured; the process scales, not disappears |
| "I'll fill in the details later" | Complete each section before moving on | Deferred details are forgotten; real-time capture is more accurate |
| "The template output isn't necessary" | Always produce the structured output format | Structured output enables comparison, audit trails, and handoff to other teams |
## Output Format
### Summary
- **SLO:** ___% over ___ day window
- **Error budget status:** ___% consumed / ___% remaining
- **Burn rate assessment:** Sustainable / At Risk / Critical
- **Top budget consumer:** ___ (___% of total consumption)
### Action Items
- [ ] Update SLO documentation if targets are being adjusted
- [ ] File reliability improvement tickets for top 3 budget consumers
- [ ] Communicate budget status to stakeholders
- [ ] Schedule follow-up review in ___ days