Skip to content
Back to skills

Implement Spec With Codex

ASecurity

Run [implement-spec](../implement-spec/SKILL.md) with Codex doing the implementation passes while you orchestrate, integrate, and review. Use when the user asks to implement a spec with Codex, or to run implement-spec with Codex as the implementer.

  • 2,066 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added September 29, 2026
ai-agents

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 29, 2026

npx -y skills add dzhng/jevgrep --skill implement-spec-with-codex --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Implement Spec With Codex?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Implement Spec With Codex
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/dzhng-implement-spec-with-codex-jevgrep/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/dzhng-implement-spec-with-codex-jevgrep)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: implement-spec-with-codex
description: Run [implement-spec](../implement-spec/SKILL.md) with Codex doing the implementation passes while you orchestrate, integrate, and review. Use when the user asks to implement a spec with Codex, or to run implement-spec with Codex as the implementer.
---

# Implement Spec with Codex

Run [implement-spec](../implement-spec/SKILL.md) exactly — same loop, same
gates, same maintenance checkpoints — but Codex writes the code. Invoking this
skill IS the explicit ask that authorizes `codex exec` delegation under the
[codex](../codex/SKILL.md) skill.

## Role split

- **Codex implements — whenever possible.** Default every implementation pass
  to a `codex exec`, sliced sharp and prompted per the codex skill (prompt
  blocks, sandbox choice, exec liveness). Run independent slices as concurrent
  execs in separate worktrees, exactly where implement-spec would fan out
  subagents.
- **You orchestrate and review.** The spec loop stays yours: pick the next
  slice, reconcile plan with code, author each prompt end-to-end, integrate
  diffs, run the gates, review the merged tree, commit,
  update the handoff, run maintenance checkpoints. None of that delegates.

Keep a pass yourself only when slicing it sharply would cost more than doing
it — tiny fixups, plan reconciliation, integration conflicts.

## Rules

- You own every result: read the full diff and run the verification yourself.
  "Codex says it's done" is never done.
- Visual results carry implement-spec's two extra proofs (production-route
  pixel diff + unprimed critique) with double force here: a sandboxed Codex
  never saw its change render, so a pass that misses the production render
  path entirely arrives looking fully "verified".
- A sandboxed Codex ships code it never saw run — browser-verify every visual
  slice yourself and budget fix rounds. Send a red gate back as a resumed
  follow-up with the failing evidence; fix it yourself only when that's
  smaller than re-prompting.
- Commit hygiene stays yours: review the change list of the merged tree
  before every commit, exactly as implement-spec demands of the integrating
  reviewer.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…