Skip to content
Back to skills

Subagent Driven Development

ASecurity

Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks in the current session

  • 2 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 1 view
  • Added September 27, 2026
ai-agentsgosecurity

Security analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 13 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned September 27, 2026

npx -y skills add gethamster/skills --skill subagent-driven-development --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Subagent Driven Development?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Subagent Driven Development
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/gethamster-subagent-driven-development/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/gethamster-subagent-driven-development)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: subagent-driven-development
description: "Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks in the current session"
version: "1.0.0"
---

# Subagent-Driven Development

Execute plan by dispatching a fresh implementer subagent per task, a task review (spec compliance + code quality) after each, and a broad whole-branch review at the end.

**Why subagents:** You delegate tasks to specialized agents with isolated context. By precisely crafting their instructions and context, you ensure they stay focused and succeed at their task. They should never inherit your session's context or history — you construct exactly what they need. This also preserves your own context for coordination work.

**Core principle:** Fresh subagent per task + task review (spec + quality) + broad final review = high quality, fast iteration

**Narration:** between tool calls, narrate at most one short line — the
ledger and the tool results carry the record.

**Continuous execution:** Do not pause to check in with your human partner between tasks. Execute all tasks from the plan without stopping. The only reasons to stop are the four named below, or all tasks complete. "Should I continue?" prompts and progress summaries waste their time — they asked you to execute the plan, so execute it.

**Rulings, not stalls.** A running plan does not wait on a human. Conflicts,
ambiguities, plan defects, a cap you would have asked to exceed — decide
them. The spec is the binding authority, the plan is its argument, and your
judgment settles what neither answers. Record every decision in the ledger as
`Ruling: <what you decided> — <why> — <what it costs if wrong>`, and keep
going. A wrong ruling costs rework your human partner can see and undo; a
session parked on a question costs their whole day and buys nothing.

Four things stop you, and only these: an irreversible or destructive
operation; a security-sensitive action; a side effect outside this worktree
that norms say you ask about first (a merge, a push to a shared branch, a
publish); and a plan so broken that every path forward is a guess. For those,
stop and ask.

Files in this skill

  • SKILL.md2.1 KB
  • implementer-prompt.md6.2 KB
  • re-review-prompt.md4.6 KB
  • sections/common-rationalizations.md1.4 KB
  • sections/example-workflow.md2.3 KB
  • sections/final-review.md1.4 KB
  • sections/finish.md833 B
  • sections/model-selection.md1.9 KB
  • sections/setup.md3.3 KB
  • sections/the-process.md4.7 KB
  • sections/the-task-loop.md12.6 KB
  • sections/when-to-use.md1.1 KB
  • task-reviewer-prompt.md8.8 KB

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…