Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Adr Generation?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/harmitx7-adr-generation)
---
name: adr-generation
description: "Use when executing, coordinating, planning, or reviewing adr generation agent workflows, cognitive loops, and architecture standards."
version: 6.0.0
last-updated: 2026-09-29
skills:
- fabel-protocol
tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash, Edit, Write
scripts-binding:
- .agent/scripts/lint_runner.js
- .agent/scripts/verify_all.js
---
# ADR Generation Skill
## Mandatory Pre-Flight Context Inspection
Before reading, generating, or refactoring code in the `adr-generation` domain, inspect these 5 critical parameters:
1. **System Boundaries & Dependencies**: Verify that all required dependencies exist in target package manifests and environment paths.
2. **Runtime Context & Platform Invariants**: Confirm target platform constraints (Node.js, Browser, Mobile OS, Edge runtime) before applying APIs.
3. **Execution Guardrails**: Identify potential side-effects, state mutations, and unhandled asynchronous exceptions.
4. **Validation & Type Contracts**: Validate input data schemas and strict type constraints across all module interfaces.
5. **Observability & Proof of Execution**: Ensure execution produces tangible verification signals (terminal output, tests, metrics).
## Activation Boundaries
- **Activate when:** Use when executing, coordinating, planning, or reviewing adr generation agent workflows, cognitive loops, and architecture standards.
- **DO NOT activate when:** The task falls outside the `adr-generation` domain or is managed by a different dedicated specialist agent.
## π Multi-Pass Execution Protocol
| Pass | Phase | Core Action | Adaptive Depth |
|:---|:---|:---|:---|
| **Pass 1** | **Understand** | Deconstruct the user's explicit objective, implicit requirements, and platform constraints. | Fast / Standard / Deep |
| **Pass 2** | **Plan** | Decompose task into smallest logical steps; map dependencies, affected files, and tool calls. | Standard / Deep |
| **Pass 3** | **Execute** | Implement solution with production-grade craft, zero placeholders, and strict typing. | All Modes |
| **Pass 4** | **Verify** | Run linters, unit tests, or compiler checks to validate structural correctness. | All Modes |
| **Pass 5** | **Attack & Falsify** | Perform adversarial search for edge-case failures, counterexamples, race conditions, and traps. | Standard / Deep |
| **Pass 6** | **Harden** | Eliminate discovered friction, optimize performance, and harden error boundaries. | Standard / Deep |
| **Pass 7** | **Quality Gate** | Enforce Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) with concrete terminal proof before finalizing. | All Modes |
Use this skill to produce formal Architecture Decision Records.
## π΄ Hallucination Traps
- β **Creating ADRs for trivial things** β β Only generate ADRs for decisions that affect boundaries, dependencies, or scale.
- β **Presenting one option as an "Alternative"** β β Always research and list at least 2 viable alternatives.
- β **Inventing Consequences** β β Focus on concrete operational or code-level consequences (e.g., "Requires manual DB migrations").
## π Pre-Flight Checklist
1. Have we identified the core problem?
2. Are there at least two viable alternatives?
3. Did we confirm the Minimal-Change Principle?
## π ADR Markdown Template
Use the following strict template when generating an ADR. Save the file in `.agent/architecture/adrs/YYYY-MM-DD-title.md`.
```markdown
# ADR: [Short Descriptive Title]
## Context
[What is the problem we are solving?]
## Decision
[What is the selected approach?]
## Alternatives Considered
1. **[Option A]**: [Why it was rejected]
2. **[Option B]**: [Why it was rejected]
## Trade-offs
[What are the downsides of the chosen Decision?]
## Consequences
[What does this decision force us to do later? What are the operational impacts?]
```
## π‘οΈ Verification-Before-Completion (VBC)
Before concluding, verify that the `system-model.yml` has been updated to reflect this ADR.
## π¨ Edge-Case & Failure Mode Matrix
| Scenario | Risk | Production Mitigation |
|:---|:---|:---|
| **Empty or Null Inputs** | Unhandled exception or unexpected rendering collapse | Enforce fallback guards, optional chaining, and explicit empty state handlers |
| **Network Timeout / Latency** | Hanging operations or duplicate side-effects | Implement bounded abort controllers, exponential backoff, and idempotency keys |
| **Concurrency / Race Conditions** | Stale state overwrite or inconsistent data mutations | Use atomic transactions, mutex locking, or cancel-on-resubmit controls |
| **Invalid Schema / Malformed Payload** | Downstream runtime errors or security injection | Validate boundary payloads with Zod/Pydantic schemas prior to execution |
| **Resource / Memory Saturation** | OOM errors, frame drops, or memory leaks | Clean up listeners, cancel active timers, and enforce pagination/virtualization |
## π€ LLM-Specific Traps Table
| Anti-Pattern | What AI Commonly Does Wrong | What Is Actually Correct |
|:---|:---|:---|
| **Hallucinated Tool Capabilities** | Assuming an external library or CLI command exists without verification | Run a verification check or verify package.json before referencing tools |
| **Premature Completion Claim** | Declaring a task finished because code was generated without verification | Execute tests, linters, or terminal commands to provide concrete proof |
| **Context Bloat Dumping** | Pasting entire multi-thousand-line files into prompt context | Extract targeted excerpts, symbols, and signatures to preserve tokens |
## ποΈ Tribunal Verification & Guardrails
**Active Reviewers:** `orchestrator` Β· `agent-organizer` Β· `logic-reviewer`
**Slash Command:** `/review` or `/tribunal-full`
### π¬ Evidence Standard (Tri-State Verification)
Every finding, audit statement, or completion claim must classify its factual certainty:
- **`[OBSERVED]`**: Directly confirmed in the codebase or verified via executed terminal command.
- **`[INFERRED]`**: Logically deduced from code patterns, architectural data flow, or schema relations.
- **`[UNVERIFIED]`**: Speculative hypothesis or runtime possibility requiring active testing or measurement.
### β Pre-Flight Self-Audit Checklist
```
β Did I deconstruct the root objective before proposing architecture?
β Did I identify dependencies, bottlenecks, and parallelizable sub-tasks?
β Did I avoid over-engineering and select the simplest effective pattern?
β Did I verify assumptions with concrete file reads instead of speculation?
β Did I establish measurable verification criteria before completion?
```
### π Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) Protocol
**CRITICAL:** You must follow a strict "evidence-based closeout" state machine.
- β **Forbidden:** Declaring a task complete because the output "looks correct."
- β **Required:** You are explicitly forbidden from finalizing any task without providing **concrete evidence** (terminal output, passing test suites, compiler success, or equivalent operational proof) that your output works as intended.