Back to skills
SKILL.md
Improve Ui
ASecurityUse when Audit an existing product surface against its own design evidence, identify verified UI problems, and write self-contained implementation plans for another agent. Strictly read-only on product source. Use when asked to review, refine, improve, or clean up an interface without replacing its identity.
- 5 stars
- 0 votes
- 0 copies
- 0 views
- Added September 27, 2026
Security analysis
100/100npx -y skills add Harmitx7/tribunal-kit --skill improve-ui --agent claude-codeAre you the author of Improve Ui?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/harmitx7-improve-ui-tribunal-kit)---
name: improve-ui
description: "Use when Audit an existing product surface against its own design evidence, identify verified UI problems, and write self-contained implementation plans for another agent. Strictly read-only on product source. Use when asked to review, refine, improve, or clean up an interface without replacing its identity."
version: 5.0.0
last-updated: 2026-09-13
skills:
- better-ui
- baseline-ui
- create-design-md
tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash, Edit, Write
scripts-binding:
- .agent/scripts/lint_runner.js
- .agent/scripts/verify_all.js
---
# Improve UI — Evidence-Based UI Audit & Implementation Planning
---
## 🛠️ Technical Architecture & Reference Recipes
---
---
## 1. Operating Rules & Boundaries
- **Strictly Read-Only on Product Source**: Never modify product source files (`src/`, `components/`, `app/`) during an `improve-ui` audit session.
- **Output Artifacts Only**: Create plans under `design-plans/` or return an actionable implementation plan to the user.
- **Respect Product Identity**: Preserve existing component architecture, routing, and product identity.
---
## 2. The 4-Phase Audit Protocol
### Phase 1: Surface Selection & Path Tracing
1. Focus on one deployable application and one coherent surface family (e.g. `Dashboard / Overview`).
2. Trace the path from route layout $\rightarrow$ page composition $\rightarrow$ shared UI primitives $\rightarrow$ tokens/CSS variables.
### Phase 2: Design Language Reconstruction
1. Inspect `DESIGN.md`, `index.css`, Tailwind tokens, or custom properties.
2. Record active background tokens, typography roles, spatial rules, and border/shadow contracts.
### Phase 3: Proof-Gated Defect Verification
Before reporting a finding, require 3 explicit proofs:
- **Observation**: Exact code line or rendered element showing the discrepancy.
- **Basis**: Violation of documented design token or 8px grid baseline.
- **Consequence**: Measurable degradation of visual hierarchy, readability, or interaction response.
### Phase 4: Implementation Plan Generation
Write a self-contained plan specifying:
- Files to modify
- Exact CSS/JSX diffs
- Verification steps (browser preview, contrast check, visual alignment)
---
## Anti-Slop Table
| Audit Pattern | Evidence-Based Rule | Rationale |
| ------------------------------ | --------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------- |
| Rewriting entire components | Targeted visual diff plan | Preserves business logic & state |
| Guessing design tokens | Citing verified `var(--...)` declarations | Ensures token adherence |
| Speculative visual preferences | Reporting only verified WCAG/token violations | Prevents arbitrary churn |
Attribution
Comments
Loading comments…