Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always
Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Verification Before Completion?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/harmitx7-verification-before-completion-tribunal-kit)
---
name: verification-before-completion
description: "Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always"
version: 5.0.0
last-updated: 2026-09-13
skills:
- clean-code
- tdd-workflow
tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash, Edit, Write
scripts-binding:
- .agent/scripts/verify_all.js
- .agent/scripts/checklist.js
- .agent/scripts/lint_runner.js
---
# Verification Before Completion
---
## π οΈ Technical Architecture & Reference Recipes
## Overview
**Core principle:** Evidence before claims, always.
**Violating the letter of this rule is violating the spirit of this rule.**
## The Iron Law
```
NO COMPLETION CLAIMS WITHOUT FRESH VERIFICATION EVIDENCE
```
If you haven't run the verification command in this message, you cannot claim it passes.
## The Gate Function
```
BEFORE claiming any status or expressing satisfaction:
1. IDENTIFY: What command proves this claim?
2. RUN: Execute the FULL command (fresh, complete)
3. READ: Full output, check exit code, count failures
4. VERIFY: Does output confirm the claim?
- If NO: State actual status with evidence
- If YES: State claim WITH evidence
5. ONLY THEN: Make the claim
Skip any step = lying, not verifying
```
## Common Failures
| Claim | Requires | Not Sufficient |
| --------------------- | ------------------------------- | ------------------------------ |
| Tests pass | Test command output: 0 failures | Previous run, "should pass" |
| Linter clean | Linter output: 0 errors | Partial check, extrapolation |
| Build succeeds | Build command: exit 0 | Linter passing, logs look good |
| Bug fixed | Test original symptom: passes | Code changed, assumed fixed |
| Regression test works | Red-green cycle verified | Test passes once |
| Agent completed | VCS diff shows changes | Agent reports "success" |
| Requirements met | Line-by-line checklist | Tests passing |
## Red Flags - STOP
- Using "should", "probably", "seems to"
- Expressing satisfaction before verification ("Great!", "Perfect!", "Done!", etc.)
- About to commit/push/PR without verification
- Trusting agent success reports
- Relying on partial verification
- Thinking "just this once"
- Tired and wanting work over
- **ANY wording implying success without having run verification**
## Rationalization Prevention
| Excuse | Reality |
| ------------------------- | ---------------------- |
| "Should work now" | RUN the verification |
| "I'm confident" | Confidence β evidence |
| "Just this once" | No exceptions |
| "Linter passed" | Linter β compiler |
| "Agent said success" | Verify independently |
| "Partial check is enough" | Partial proves nothing |
## Key Patterns
**Tests:**
```
β [Run test command] [See: 34/34 pass] "All tests pass"
β "Should pass now" / "Looks correct"
```
**Build:**
```
β [Run build] [See: exit 0] "Build passes"
β "Linter passed" (linter doesn't check compilation)
```
**Requirements:**
```
β Re-read plan β Create checklist β Verify each β Report gaps or completion
β "Tests pass, phase complete"
```