Skip to content
Back to skills

Common Session Retrospective

ASecurity

- **Candidate skill:** Do not weaken its assertions or promote it. A held-out failure is evidence of a real skill gap; preserve the failure, classify the root cause, propose a targeted correction, and re-run fresh held-out evaluations against the current guidance and no-skill baseline. Promotion requires independent maintainer approval and verified evidence, with a pinned version, canary monitoring, and rollback to the last verified version. - **Evaluator:** Treat the incorrect rejection as a...

  • 571 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added September 24, 2026
development

Security analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 16 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned September 24, 2026

npx -y skills add HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard --skill common-session-retrospective --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Common Session Retrospective?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Common Session Retrospective
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/hoangnguyen0403-common-session-retrospective-7aef39f4/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/hoangnguyen0403-common-session-retrospective-7aef39f4)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
- **Candidate skill:** Do not weaken its assertions or promote it. A held-out failure is evidence of a real skill gap; preserve the failure, classify the root cause, propose a targeted correction, and re-run fresh held-out evaluations against the current guidance and no-skill baseline. Promotion requires independent maintainer approval and verified evidence, with a pinned version, canary monitoring, and rollback to the last verified version.

- **Evaluator:** Treat the incorrect rejection as a separate evaluator/grader defect. Reproduce the valid answer, document the evaluator mismatch, and review or correct the evaluator independently. Do not weaken the candidate’s assertions to game an invalid grader; preserve the candidate’s genuine held-out failure and evaluate it with the corrected grader.

Because no explicit maintenance authorization was provided, make these proposal-only changes rather than editing the canonical registry or installed copies. If authorized later, update the canonical source, regenerate exports through existing tooling, and record redacted evidence, candidate status, source revision, evaluation run, review reference, and rollback version in `AGENTS_LEARNING.md`, following the applicable `AGENTS.md` guidance.

Files in this skill

  • eval-1.baseline.md1.3 KB
  • eval-1.with-skill.md2.5 KB
  • eval-2.baseline.md979 B
  • eval-2.with-skill.md1.5 KB
  • eval-3.baseline.md667 B
  • eval-3.with-skill.md884 B
  • eval-4.baseline.md766 B
  • eval-4.with-skill.md1.2 KB
  • trigger-1.md153 B
  • trigger-2.md183 B
  • trigger-3.md137 B
  • trigger-4.md100 B
  • trigger-5.md146 B
  • trigger-6.md145 B
  • trigger-7.md116 B

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…