I can’t approve or promote your own favorable exercise result. Assuming you participated in execution or evidence collection, that violates the **No operator grading** guardrail. An independent adjudicator must compare the redacted evidence against the pre-held approved objective, scope, expected observation, and ground-truth version. Missing evidence or a blocked runtime remains `blocked`, not passed; unresolved discrepancies must be preserved and routed to the accountable owner. The result ...
Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Cyber Exercise Adjudication?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/hoangnguyen0403-cyber-exercise-adjudication-a39ccdf2)
I can’t approve or promote your own favorable exercise result. Assuming you participated in execution or evidence collection, that violates the **No operator grading** guardrail.
An independent adjudicator must compare the redacted evidence against the pre-held approved objective, scope, expected observation, and ground-truth version. Missing evidence or a blocked runtime remains `blocked`, not passed; unresolved discrepancies must be preserved and routed to the accountable owner. The result must use only justified statuses: `confirmed`, `suspected`, `blocked`, `not-tested`, or `false-positive`.
Record `engagement_scope_ref`, `skill_version`, `source`, `observed_at`, `finding_status`, `evidence_refs`, `limitations`, and `accountable_owner`. This is an exercise-evidence adjudication, not a compliance certification or real-world efficacy claim.
