Skip to content
Back to skills

Cyber Framework Mapping

ASecurity

Maintains sparse, reviewable cybersecurity framework edges with versioned IDs, relation, rationale, source, and review status. Use when mapping exercise observations or procedures to NIST, ATT&CK, or another named framework.

  • 571 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added September 24, 2026
developmentsecurity

Security analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 3 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned October 3, 2026

npx -y skills add HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard --skill cyber-framework-mapping --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Cyber Framework Mapping?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Cyber Framework Mapping
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/hoangnguyen0403-cyber-framework-mapping-40f2d904/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/hoangnguyen0403-cyber-framework-mapping-40f2d904)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: cyber-framework-mapping
guardrail: true
description: Maintains sparse, reviewable cybersecurity framework edges with versioned IDs, relation, rationale, source, and review status. Use when mapping exercise observations or procedures to NIST, ATT&CK, or another named framework.
metadata:
  labels: [cybersecurity, framework-mapping, provenance]
  triggers:
    keywords: [framework mapping, control mapping, ATT&CK mapping, NIST mapping, framework edge, mapping review]
---
# Cyber Framework Mapping

## **Priority: P1 (HIGH)**

Map only evidenced relationships; catalog context is not proof of efficacy, compliance, or coverage.

## Structure

```text
cyber-framework-mapping/
├── SKILL.md
├── references/edge-record.md
└── evals/evals.json
```

## Workflow

1. Name framework, version, stable ID, and exact source URL or document section.
2. Choose relation (`supports`, `describes`, `observed-as`, `partial`, `unknown`, or `conflicts`).
3. Write a bounded rationale tied to an evidence record, not a generic similarity.
4. Set review status: `reviewed`, `needs-review`, or `unreviewed`; include reviewer and date when reviewed.
5. Preserve empty or unknown mappings explicitly; do not infer a complete catalog.
6. On a version/source change, preserve the prior versioned edge and its evidence unchanged. Create a separately versioned candidate linked to the prior record, mark it `needs-review`, and re-review; never overwrite historical mappings.

## Rules

- Prefer primary framework publications and official technique catalogs.
- Keep framework IDs version-qualified; never silently merge revisions.
- Separate a mapped edge from a control claim, measured efficacy, or compliance assertion.
- Link [shared evidence fields](../cyber-evidence/SKILL.md) for observation provenance.
For mapped observations, carry `engagement_scope_ref`, `skill_version`, `source`, `observed_at`, `finding_status`, `evidence_refs`, `limitations`, and `accountable_owner`.

## Anti-Patterns

- **No broad equivalence**: One keyword does not establish a mapping.
- **No version drift**: Verify the current revision before reusing an ID.
- **No compliance leap**: Mapping never certifies a control or outcome.
- **No fabricated completeness**: Mark unknown edges and gaps.

## References

- [Framework edge schema](references/edge-record.md)

Files in this skill

  • SKILL.md2.3 KB
  • evals/evals.json2.5 KB
  • references/edge-record.md801 B

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…