Back to skills
SKILL.md
Lipidomics Lcms Annotation
ASecurity'Use when you have untargeted lipidomics LC-MS/MS data (mzML) and want
- 15 stars
- 0 votes
- 0 copies
- 1 view
- Added September 12, 2026
Works with
Security analysis
100/100Pro scans all 3 files and shows the line behind each finding
npx -y skills add HolobiomicsLab/asb-skill-collections --skill lipidomics-lcms-annotation --agent claude-codeAre you the author of Lipidomics Lcms Annotation?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/holobiomicslab-lipidomics-lcms-annotation)---
name: lipidomics-lcms-annotation-workflow
description: 'Use when you have untargeted lipidomics LC-MS/MS data (mzML) and want
a class- and species-level annotated lipid feature table — preprocessing, normalization,
lipid identification by MS/MS, retention/adduct rule validation, differential analysis,
and a fused master table.
'
license: CC-BY-4.0
metadata:
kind: composite-workflow
collection: https://w3id.org/holobiomicslab/asb-skill/collection/metabolomics/v2
techniques:
- LC-MS
stage_count: 6
member_skills:
- lcms-peak-detection-and-alignment
- mass-spectrometry-metadata-extraction
- file-format-conversion-peak-picking-to-lipidmatch
- feature-table-normalization
- mass-spectrometry-data-column-mapping
- batch-aware-normalization-workflows
- batch-correction-quality-assessment
- batch-effect-correction-in-metabolomics
- batch-corrected-feature-table-validation
- batch-effect-correction-workflow
- lipid-identification-scoring
- fragment-ion-library-matching
- multi-species-lipid-prediction
- uhplc-hrms-ms-data-matching
- lipid-structure-specification
- false-positive-annotation-filtering
- lipid-identification-quality-filtering
- lipid-retention-time-rule-application
- lipid-species-annotation-assessment
- multicontrast-statistical-testing-lipidomics
- fold-change-calculation
- lipid-abundance-differential-analysis
- differential-lipid-expression-analysis
- metabolite-feature-anova-analysis
- structured-data-matrix-construction
- lipid-class-feature-annotation
- lipid-class-annotation-and-parsing
- lipid-species-classification-mapping
member_tools:
- ISFrag
- R
- XCMS
- CAMERA
- Python
- pycombat
- Asari
- LipidMatch
- MZmine
- MS-DIAL
- Compound Discoverer
- LipidIN LCI module
- lipidr
- limma
- ADViSELipidomics
- LipidSearch
- LIQUID
- LIPID MAPS
coverage_gaps: []
derived_from_workflows: []
bound_by: perspicacite-semantic
schema_version: 0.3.0
attribution:
generator: AgenticScienceBuilder
promoter: Louis-Félix Nothias
sponsor: CNRS & Université Côte d'Azur
zenodo_doi: 10.5281/zenodo.20794027
---
# Lipidomics LC-MS/MS Annotation
## Summary
End-to-end lipidomics annotation: raw LC-MS/MS in, a confidence-graded lipid table out, with lipid-class-aware identification, normalization, and group-wise statistics.
## When to use
Use when you have untargeted lipidomics LC-MS/MS data (mzML) and want a class- and species-level annotated lipid feature table — preprocessing, normalization, lipid identification by MS/MS, retention/adduct rule validation, differential analysis, and a fused master table.
## When NOT to use
- The data is not LC-MS.
- You need a single atomic step, not the full pipeline (use the leaf skill directly via the router).
## Stages
### Stage 1 — preprocess
**Goal:** raw lipidomics mzML -> aligned feature table + MS/MS export
**EDAM operation:** operation_3215
**Inputs:** mzML · **Outputs:** feature-table, mgf
**Candidate leaf skills:** `lcms-peak-detection-and-alignment` (primary), `mass-spectrometry-metadata-extraction`, `file-format-conversion-peak-picking-to-lipidmatch`, `feature-table-normalization`, `mass-spectrometry-data-column-mapping`
**Tools (primary):** ISFrag, R, XCMS, CAMERA
**Other candidate tools:** MZmine, MS-DIAL, Compound Discoverer, LipidMatch
**Grounding:** 2 KB(s); DOIs: 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c01644, 10.1186/s12859-017-1744-3
### Stage 2 — normalize
**Goal:** normalize + batch-correct the lipid feature table
**EDAM operation:** operation_3434
**Inputs:** feature-table · **Outputs:** feature-table
**Candidate leaf skills:** `batch-aware-normalization-workflows` (primary), `batch-correction-quality-assessment`, `batch-effect-correction-in-metabolomics`, `batch-corrected-feature-table-validation`, `batch-effect-correction-workflow`
**Tools (primary):** Python, pycombat, Asari
**Other candidate tools:** ThermoRawFileParser, pcpfm, ADViSELipidomics, limma, edgeR, ComBat, R, Jupyter Notebook, Google Colab, FBMN-STATS
**Grounding:** 3 KB(s); DOIs: 10.1038/s41596-024-01046-3, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac706, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011912
### Stage 3 — lipid_identification
**Goal:** identify lipids (class + species) from MS/MS fragmentation
**EDAM operation:** operation_3803
**Inputs:** mgf · **Outputs:** tsv
**Candidate leaf skills:** `lipid-identification-scoring` (primary), `fragment-ion-library-matching`, `multi-species-lipid-prediction`, `uhplc-hrms-ms-data-matching`, `lipid-structure-specification`
**Tools (primary):** LipidMatch, MZmine, XCMS, MS-DIAL, Compound Discoverer
**Other candidate tools:** Q-Exactive, CAMERA, LipidIN EQ module, LipidIN LCI module, Q-Exactive orbitrap, Agilent Q-TOF, Bruker Q-TOF, SCIEX Q-TOF
**Grounding:** 2 KB(s); DOIs: 10.1038/s41467-025-59683-5, 10.1186/s12859-017-1744-3
### Stage 4 — rule_validation
**Goal:** validate lipid annotations by adduct / retention-time / class rules
**EDAM operation:** operation_3695
**Inputs:** tsv · **Outputs:** tsv
**Candidate leaf skills:** `false-positive-annotation-filtering` (primary), `lipid-identification-quality-filtering`, `lipid-retention-time-rule-application`, `lipid-species-annotation-assessment`
**Tools (primary):** XCMS, CAMERA, LipidIN LCI module
**Other candidate tools:** LipoCLEAN, MS-DIAL, LipidIN (LCI Module), RaMS, MetaboAnnotatoR, R
**Grounding:** 3 KB(s); DOIs: 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c03032, 10.1021/acs.analchem.4c04040, 10.1038/s41467-025-59683-5
### Stage 5 — statistics
**Goal:** differential lipid analysis between sample groups
**EDAM operation:** operation_3659
**Inputs:** feature-table, tsv · **Outputs:** tsv
**Candidate leaf skills:** `multicontrast-statistical-testing-lipidomics` (primary), `fold-change-calculation`, `lipid-abundance-differential-analysis`, `differential-lipid-expression-analysis`, `metabolite-feature-anova-analysis`
**Tools (primary):** lipidr, limma, R
**Other candidate tools:** Python (pandas, NumPy, SciPy), R (base stats, tidyverse, or similar), pandas, NumPy, SciPy, edgeR.R, ADViSELipidomics, edgeR, ComBat, LIPID MAPS, Metabolomics Workbench API, margheRita, MS-DIAL
**Grounding:** 5 KB(s); DOIs: 10.1021/acs.analchem.4c05039, 10.1021/acs.jproteome.0c00082, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac706, 10.1101/2024.06.20.599545 …
### Stage 6 — fusion
**Goal:** consolidate lipid annotations + stats into one master table
**EDAM operation:** operation_3434
**Inputs:** feature-table, tsv · **Outputs:** tsv
**Candidate leaf skills:** `structured-data-matrix-construction` (primary), `lipid-class-feature-annotation`, `lipid-class-annotation-and-parsing`, `lipid-species-classification-mapping`
**Tools (primary):** ADViSELipidomics, LipidSearch, LIQUID, LIPID MAPS
**Other candidate tools:** lipidr, R, Skyline, SummarizedExperiment, limma, edgeR, ComBat
**Grounding:** 2 KB(s); DOIs: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.0c00082, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac706
## Grounding
Each stage carries the `kb_slugs`/`dois` of the leaves it draws on. Ground any stage against its source paper with the collection's `/ground` command or `bin/perspicacite_kb_bind.py` (Perspicacité KB; serverless local-clone fallback).
## Verification contract
`workflow.yaml` declares the stage graph and its typed outputs; the final stage emits the master deliverable. Automatic grading of that graph (`asb solve-workflow`, checkpoint mode) is **not part of this release**: no released ASB version loads these files. Follow the stages as an outline — the structure is validated, the execution is not.
## Provenance
Generated by `compose_workflows.py` (semantic binding + EDAM-aware primary selection). `derived_from_workflows` lists the ASB per-paper workflows whose structure corroborated this pipeline; it is a provenance record, and no ablation experiment consuming it is released. Validated structurally by `validate_workflows.py` through `release_gate.py`: the collection is the hard-gated artefact and this workflows layer is additive.
Files in this skill
- README.md
- SKILL.md
- workflow.yaml
Attribution
Comments
Loading comments…