Skip to content
Back to skills

Debug Expert

ASecurity

Investigate complex bugs, intermittent failures, performance degradations, and system-wide issues requiring deep reasoning across multiple components

  • 6 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added September 26, 2026
ai-agentspythongobashnodedebugginggitperformance

Works with

  • mcp

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 26, 2026

npx -y skills add hotak92/vibecoded-orchestrator --skill debug-expert --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Debug Expert?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Debug Expert
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/hotak92-debug-expert/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/hotak92-debug-expert)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: debug-expert
description: Investigate complex bugs, intermittent failures, performance degradations, and system-wide issues requiring deep reasoning across multiple components
short_desc: "investigate hard bugs: flaky, intermittent, races"
keywords: ["intermittent failure", "flaky test", "performance degradation", "race condition", "system-wide bug", "root cause", "hard to reproduce", "weird bug", heisenbug, "debug this", "why does this fail"]
model: opus
---

# Debug Expert (Opus)

**Purpose**: Investigate complex bugs, intermittent failures, performance degradations, and system-wide issues requiring deep reasoning across multiple components.

**Model**: Opus (handles ambiguity, traces root causes, forms hypotheses)

**When to Invoke Autonomously**:

Use this skill when:
1. **Intermittent Failures**: Bug only reproduces sometimes (race conditions, timing issues)
2. **System-Wide Problems**: Issue spans multiple components/services
3. **Performance Degradation**: Unexplained slowdowns or resource exhaustion
4. **Production Incidents**: Critical issues affecting users
5. **No Obvious Cause**: Error messages are vague or misleading
6. **Multiple Failed Fixes**: Previous attempts haven't resolved the issue

**DO NOT invoke for**:
- Obvious errors with clear stack traces
- Syntax errors or type mismatches
- Simple null pointer issues
- Errors with clear messages pointing to exact line

## Decision Tree

```
Bug is:
├─ Clear error message + obvious fix? → Just fix it
├─ Intermittent/hard to reproduce? → Use this skill
├─ Spans multiple components? → Use this skill
├─ Performance issue without clear cause? → Use this skill
├─ Production incident affecting users? → Use this skill
├─ Simple syntax/type error? → Don't use this skill
└─ Already tried 2+ fixes that didn't work? → Use this skill
```

## Usage

```
/debug-expert investigate [issue description]
/debug-expert performance-trace [slow operation]
/debug-expert root-cause-analysis [incident]
```

## What This Skill Does

### 1. Hypothesis Formation
- Generates 3-5 potential root causes based on symptoms
- Ranks hypotheses by likelihood
- Identifies key assumptions to test

### 2. Evidence Gathering
- Reviews relevant code paths
- Analyzes logs, traces, metrics
- Examines recent changes (git history)
- Checks system state (DB, cache, queues)

### 3. Systematic Investigation
- Designs tests to confirm/eliminate hypotheses
- Adds instrumentation (logging, metrics, traces)
- Reproduces issue in controlled environment
- Bisects problem space (binary search approach)

### 4. Root Cause Identification
- Traces issue to specific code/config/data
- Distinguishes symptoms from underlying cause
- Documents failure chain (what led to what)

### 5. Fix Recommendation
- Proposes minimal fix for immediate resolution
- Identifies broader architectural improvements
- Suggests preventive measures (tests, monitoring, validation)

## Output Format

Report each investigation as:

```markdown
## Bug: [one-line summary]

**Symptoms**: [what is observed — errors, timing, frequency]
**Reproduction**: [steps, or "intermittent — reproduces ~1 in N"]

### Hypotheses (ranked)
1. [most likely cause] — [why, and the test that confirms/eliminates it]
2. [next] — [...]

### Investigation
[evidence gathered: relevant code paths, log/trace findings, git changes examined]

### Root Cause
[specific code/config/data traced to; the failure chain that led to it]

### Fix
- **Immediate**: [minimal change that resolves it]
- **Preventive**: [test, monitoring, or validation to stop recurrence]
```

## Integration with Knowledge Graph

After debugging:
1. Document root cause in `knowledge/bugs/[bug-category].md`
2. Create/update anti-pattern node if applicable
3. Link to related architectural concepts
4. Tag with component, severity, and fix complexity

## Debugging Strategies

- **Binary Search**: Eliminate half the system at a time
- **Time Travel**: Bisect git history to find introducing commit
- **Inversion**: Ask "when does X work?" instead of "why does X fail?"
- **Minimal Reproduction**: Reduce to smallest test case that triggers bug

## Quick Workflow Reference

**Before debugging**: Search for similar bugs and solutions
```bash
.claude/scripts/kg-search search "bug-category" --type concept
```

**For deep research**: run `hybrid_search("<error pattern topic>")` (Weaviate MCP)

**Development env**: Python 3.12, Weaviate:8081, Ollama:11435. Activate the project's own `.venv/` (`source .venv/bin/activate`); KG/code-graph via `.claude/scripts/kg-*` and `.claude/scripts/code-graph-*` wrappers, which handle their venv internally.

## Success Metrics

This skill is working well if:
- ✅ Identifies root cause within 3-5 investigation rounds
- ✅ Fixes resolve issue permanently
- ✅ Investigation is systematic, not random trial-and-error
- ✅ Documents findings for future reference
- ✅ Proposes preventive measures

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…