Skip to content
Back to skills

Weekly

ASecurity

Weekly maintenance — reviews dependency PRs and runs any repo-specific weekly tasks defined in running-tend.

  • 7 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added September 20, 2026
ai-agentsshellbashgitapisecurity

Works with

  • api

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 20, 2026

npx -y skills add imMamdouhaboammar/get-fable --skill weekly --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Weekly?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Weekly
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/immamdouhaboammar-weekly/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/immamdouhaboammar-weekly)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: weekly
description: Weekly maintenance — reviews dependency PRs and runs any repo-specific weekly tasks defined in running-tend.
metadata:
  internal: true
---

# Weekly Maintenance

## Step 0: Load environment skills

Load `/tend-ci-runner:running-in-ci` first — it contains CI security rules, review/comment formatting, and polling conventions. This skill posts approvals and comments on PRs, so those rules apply. `running-in-ci` will also load the repo's `running-tend` overlay if one exists; keep the loaded content in mind for Step 3.

## Step 1: Find dependency PRs

```bash
gh pr list --state open --limit 200 --json number,title,author,labels \
  --jq '.[] | select(.author.login == "dependabot[bot]" or .author.login == "renovate[bot]" or (.labels | any(.name == "dependencies")))'
```

If no dependency PRs are open, note "0 dependency PRs to process" and continue to Step 3 — do not exit; repo-specific weekly tasks may still be due.

## Step 2: For each dependency PR

1. Check CI status: `gh pr checks <number>`
2. If CI is passing, review the diff for breaking changes (major version bumps, API changes, deprecation warnings)
3. If the update is safe (patch/minor with green CI), check whether the bot has already approved this commit before approving — a dependabot PR open across multiple weekly runs (or already approved by `tend-review` on creation) would otherwise accumulate redundant approvals on the same `commit_id`:
   ```bash
   uv run --script "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/bot_review_state.py" \
     prepare-approval <number>
   ```

   **If `already_approved` is true, this PR is done — move to the next one.**
   Otherwise compose `$TMPDIR/review-body.md`. Give the
   reviewer the context for the approval: the upgrade's scope and the evidence
   relevant to its safety. Keep it concise and omit the inspection chronology.
   Use a file rather than an inline `--body` because a
   package name written as inline code puts a backtick in a double-quoted
   argument, and bash runs the span as a command. Then post, re-reading the sha
   from disk, since shell state didn't survive the Write:

   ```bash
   # `commit_id` pins the approval to the commit that was checked. Unpinned,
   # GitHub anchors it at whatever is live when the POST lands — an approval
   # of code nothing checked, on a PR `nightly` rebases on purpose. Read the
   # sha first and bail if it isn't there: inlined as `$(cat ...)` a missing
   # file substitutes the empty string and the POST still runs, which is the
   # unpinned approval this pins against.
   CHECKED=$(cat "$TMPDIR/checked-head-<number>") || exit 0
   REPO=$(gh repo view --json nameWithOwner --jq '.nameWithOwner')
   gh api "repos/$REPO/pulls/<number>/reviews" --method POST \
     -f event=APPROVE -f commit_id="$CHECKED" -F body=@"$TMPDIR/review-body.md"
   ```
4. If CI is failing, comment with the failure summary and skip
5. If a major version bump, comment noting it needs manual review and skip
6. On either skip path (4 or 5), dismiss an approval that predates the newest rewrite before you leave. Both paths are reachable *because* a rebase changed something, and neither passes through item 3's guard — so the pre-rewrite approval stays the bot's latest review, re-anchored onto the current head, and the PR still reads as bot-approved while you comment that it isn't mergeable:
   ```bash
   uv run --script "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/bot_review_state.py" \
     dismiss-stale <number> \
     "Rebased since this approval; the new head is unreviewed."
   ```
   A dismissed review reports `DISMISSED` rather than `APPROVED`, so the filter stops matching it and a later run re-dismisses nothing.

## Step 3: Repo-specific weekly tasks

Perform any weekly maintenance the loaded `running-tend` overlay defines, following the repo's PR title conventions. If it defines no weekly tasks (or none are due this week), say so in the summary.

## Step 4: Summary

Report: dependency PRs processed/approved/skipped (with reasons), and repo-specific weekly tasks completed (or "no repo-specific weekly tasks defined" / "no weekly tasks due").

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…