Skip to content
Back to skills

Analyze Change Impact

ASecurity

Analyze the causal system-wide impact of a proposed change across behavior, interfaces, state/data, runtime dependencies, tests, documentation, controls, people/processes, and model/prompt/context behavior. Use before planning when lexical reference search is insufficient to establish blast radius and verification obligations.

  • 67 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added September 29, 2026
devopsgodocumentation

Security analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 2 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned September 29, 2026

npx -y skills add Jamie-BitFlight/claude_skills --skill analyze-change-impact --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Analyze Change Impact?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Analyze Change Impact
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/jamie-bitflight-analyze-change-impact/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/jamie-bitflight-analyze-change-impact)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: analyze-change-impact
description: Analyze the causal system-wide impact of a proposed change across behavior, interfaces, state/data, runtime dependencies, tests, documentation, controls, people/processes, and model/prompt/context behavior. Use before planning when lexical reference search is insufficient to establish blast radius and verification obligations.
---
# Analyze Change Impact

Find what the proposed change can cause across the real system. Text search discovers candidates; it does not establish impact.

1. Establish the current baseline, proposed delta, intended outcome, non-goals, time horizon, and rollback/transition boundary.
2. Seed an impact set from changed interfaces, state, data, dependencies, controls, actors, and externally visible behavior.
3. Follow causal propagation paths through callers/consumers, schemas/state transitions, runtime/deployment dependencies, tests, documentation, operational controls, people/process handoffs, and model/prompt/context behavior where applicable.
4. For each candidate, require a causal path from the change to a changed state, decision, outcome, obligation, or risk. Exclude lexical-only matches with no causal path.
5. Record direct evidence separately from derived impact. Keep unknown frontier items when evidence cannot close a plausible path.
6. For each included impact identify owner/consumer, transition or compatibility risk, and a verification obligation capable of detecting the predicted effect.
7. Check removed controls and delayed/second-order effects explicitly when the change can suppress detection or move failure downstream.
8. Return the estimated impact set, propagation paths, exclusions with rationale, unknown frontier, transition risks, and verification obligations.

Do not design the implementation. Do not claim zero impact from zero text matches. Do not convert impact count into severity without considering consequence and propagation.

Files in this skill

  • SKILL-GOALS.md295 B
  • SKILL.md1.9 KB

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…