Skip to content
Back to skills

Verify Factual Claim

ASecurity

Verify one falsifiable factual claim against evidence appropriate to the claim. Use when a concrete assertion about software, documentation, configuration, releases, or repository behavior must be classified as VERIFIED, REFUTED, or INCONCLUSIVE.

  • 67 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 1 view
  • Added September 29, 2026
researchdocumentation

Security analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 2 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned September 29, 2026

npx -y skills add Jamie-BitFlight/claude_skills --skill verify-factual-claim --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Verify Factual Claim?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Verify Factual Claim
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/jamie-bitflight-verify-factual-claim/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/jamie-bitflight-verify-factual-claim)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: verify-factual-claim
description: Verify one falsifiable factual claim against evidence appropriate to the claim. Use when a concrete assertion about software, documentation, configuration, releases, or repository behavior must be classified as VERIFIED, REFUTED, or INCONCLUSIVE.
---
# Verify a Factual Claim

Treat recall as a hypothesis, never evidence.

1. Rewrite the input as the narrowest falsifiable claim without changing its meaning.
2. Identify evidence that could confirm and evidence that could refute it.
3. Use the strongest practical source for the claim: authoritative specification/docs for public contracts; version-pinned source/tests for implementation behavior; runtime observation for environment behavior; maintainer records for intent.
4. Record version, revision, platform, configuration, or time boundaries that can change the result.
5. Challenge consequential conclusions with a plausible counter-hypothesis and an independent evidence path when it can discriminate between explanations.
6. Return VERIFIED only when evidence establishes the claim in scope; REFUTED only when evidence contradicts it; otherwise INCONCLUSIVE.

Return the exact claim, verdict, concise evidence citations, applicable conditions, explanation, and unresolved evidence. Preserve contradictory sources rather than silently choosing one. Do not require a fixed number of sources or quotes when one authoritative observation resolves the claim.

Files in this skill

  • SKILL-GOALS.md280 B
  • SKILL.md1.4 KB

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…