Skip to content
Back to skills

Woo Sailor

ASecurity

Analyze, improve, or represent processes across a file or directory by delegating to process-siren. Uses the same semantic model and validation loop as single-process work; Mermaid is produced when it is the useful concise representation.

  • 67 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 1 view
  • Added September 12, 2026
business

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 29, 2026

npx -y skills add Jamie-BitFlight/claude_skills --skill woo-sailor --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Woo Sailor?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Woo Sailor
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/jamie-bitflight-woo-sailor/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/jamie-bitflight-woo-sailor)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: woo-sailor
description: Analyze, improve, or represent processes across a file or directory by delegating to process-siren. Uses the same semantic model and validation loop as single-process work; Mermaid is produced when it is the useful concise representation.
argument-hint: <file-or-directory> [--analyze|--improve|--represent] [--dry-run|--report]
user-invocable: true
context: fork
agent: process-siren:process-siren
---

You are about to process a set of files. Read every flag in <user_arguments>. Select --analyze, --improve, or --represent; default to --improve. --analyze, --dry-run or --report anywhere in the arguments selects read-only ANALYZE, whatever other mode flag is present.

<path>$0</path>
<user_arguments>$ARGUMENTS</user_arguments>

If there is no <path> value, then stop, and say: /woo-sailor <file-or-directory> [--analyze|--improve|--represent] [--dry-run|--report]

Before reading or analyzing the target, load `/process-siren:improve-processes` and use its semantic model, validation loop, Recursion Safety, and Result Contract. Execute the selected mode in the current invocation context. A host-applied context fork or agent route is optional acceleration, not a precondition for this workflow.

The following diagram is the authoritative routing procedure. Eligible directory files: `**/SKILL.md`, `**/CLAUDE.md`, `**/AGENTS.md`, `**/AGENT.md`, `**/agents/*.md`, `**/rules/*.md`.

```mermaid
flowchart TD
    Start(["Path and arguments received"]) --> Exists{"Does path exist?"}
    Exists -->|"No"| Stop(["Report missing path and stop"])
    Exists -->|"Yes"| ReadOnly{"Any of --analyze, --dry-run, --report<br>in user_arguments?"}
    ReadOnly -->|"Yes"| Analyze["Mode = ANALYZE; no mutation"]
    ReadOnly -->|"No"| Mode{"Mode flags in user_arguments?"}
    Mode -->|"--improve and --represent"| Conflict(["Report conflicting mode flags and stop"])
    Mode -->|"--represent"| Represent["Mode = REPRESENT; preserve semantics"]
    Mode -->|"--improve or none"| Improve["Mode = IMPROVE"]
    Analyze --> Scope{"Single file or directory?"}
    Represent --> Scope
    Improve --> Scope
    Scope -->|"Single file"| One["Execute selected mode in the current invocation context"]
    Scope -->|"Directory"| Discover["Discover eligible files; bind material source identities"]
    Discover --> Models["Analyze each file read-only in the current invocation context; collect ProcessModels and assessments"]
    Models --> Synthesize["Synthesize cross-file contracts, invariants, assumptions, ownership, and recovery"]
    Synthesize --> Route{"Selected mode?"}
    Route -->|"ANALYZE"| Aggregate["Return aggregate findings; preserve per-file assessments"]
    Route -->|"REPRESENT"| Render["Faithfully represent requested targets; retain authority and assessment limits"]
    Route -->|"IMPROVE"| Plan["Build one cross-file candidate; validate dependencies and affected claims"]
    Plan --> Safe{"Contract, evidence and conditional-apply requirements satisfied?"}
    Safe -->|"No"| Block["Do not apply dependent set; preserve proposal and named blockers"]
    Safe -->|"Yes"| Apply["Apply through material-change lifecycle; verify resulting state"]
    One --> Result["Return caller envelope plus assessments, evidence, changes and remaining work"]
    Aggregate --> Result
    Render --> Result
    Block --> Result
    Apply --> Result
```

For the requested scope, execute `/process-siren:improve-processes` directly after loading it; keep all same-scope work in this invocation. When analysis requires a strictly narrower subsystem, boundary, claim, or unresolved dependency, descend according to its Recursion Safety procedure.

When the selected mode is REPRESENT, load `/process-siren:mermaids-treasure` and render the faithful Mermaid projection. In ANALYZE or IMPROVE, load it and render Mermaid only when that would materially improve the requested result; otherwise return the process model and findings without Mermaid.

A blocked file does not stop unrelated independent work. `UNVALIDATED` or `INVALID` does not by itself block ANALYZE or faithful REPRESENT. In IMPROVE, block only the dependent mutation set whose required contract, evidence, intent, or apply guarantee is unresolved; never write per-file improvements before cross-file synthesis establishes a coherent apply set.

Before material or concurrent writes, load the material-change lifecycle reference that `/process-siren:improve-processes` links under Evidence-Driven Improvement; it defines source/dependency rechecks, conditional apply and safe multi-file publication. A repeated/no-progress candidate or partial application remains explicit, not a completed coherent improvement. Preserve the caller's exact task-status envelope separately from per-target assessments; successfully finishing analysis does not change INVALID into READY.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…