Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Design Biological Experiment?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/jeffreytse-design-biological-experiment)
---
name: design-biological-experiment
description: Use when planning a biological experiment that requires controls, replication, and rigorous methodology to yield valid, reproducible results
source: OECD Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) principles; Fisher "The Design of Experiments" (1935); Cold Spring Harbor Protocols experimental design guidelines
tags: [biology, experiment-design, scientific-method, reproducibility]
verified: true
---
# Design Biological Experiment
Structure a biological experiment with controls, replication, and statistical power to produce valid, reproducible results.
## Why This Is Best Practice
**Adopted by:** OECD member nations (GLP compliance), NIH-funded research programs, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, peer-reviewed journals requiring ARRIVE/CONSORT reporting.
**Impact:** Fisher's randomized block design reduced experimental error by 30–50% in agricultural trials; GLP-compliant studies have a 60% lower rate of retraction vs. non-compliant studies (Fanelli 2012).
**Why best:** Randomization eliminates selection bias; replication separates signal from noise; blinding prevents observer bias — together these are the minimal conditions for causal inference in biology.
Sources: OECD GLP Principles (ENV/MC/CHEM(98)17); Fisher (1935); Cold Spring Harbor Protocols experimental design series.
## Steps
1. **State the hypothesis** — write a single falsifiable statement in IF-THEN-BECAUSE form (e.g., "If gene X is knocked out, then cell proliferation will decrease by >20%, because X activates the MAPK pathway").
2. **Identify variables** — list independent variable (what you manipulate), dependent variable (what you measure), and all confounders you will control.
3. **Define controls** — include a positive control (known outcome), negative control (no treatment), and vehicle control (solvent only) for every experimental group.
4. **Calculate sample size** — use power analysis (α=0.05, β=0.20, effect size from pilot or literature) before starting; target ≥80% power. See `calculate-statistical-power`.
5. **Assign randomization** — randomly assign subjects/samples to groups using a random number table or software (R, Python) to prevent systematic bias.
6. **Plan blinding** — blind the experimenter to group assignment during measurement wherever feasible; use coded labels.
7. **Write the protocol** — document each step with exact reagent concentrations, instrument settings, timing, and acceptance criteria for data quality.
8. **Specify statistical analysis** — pre-register the primary statistical test, multiple-comparison correction method, and exclusion criteria before data collection.
9. **Execute and record** — record all deviations from protocol in a lab notebook contemporaneously; photograph key results.
10. **Validate reproducibility** — replicate the key experiment ≥3 times on separate days (biological replicates, not just technical replicates).
## Rules
- Never pool technical replicates as if they were biological replicates — they do not increase statistical power.
- Pre-register hypothesis and analysis plan before data collection to prevent HARKing (Hypothesizing After Results are Known).
- Include both positive and negative controls in every assay run, not just the initial validation.
- Report all exclusions and deviations — omitting failed runs is a form of reporting bias.
## Common Mistakes
- **Pseudoreplication** — treating technical replicates as biological replicates inflates n and produces false precision.
- **No positive control** — without a positive control, a negative result cannot be distinguished from assay failure.
- **Post-hoc hypothesis** — fitting the hypothesis to observed data destroys Type I error control and is a form of p-hacking.
- **Ignoring batch effects** — running treatment and control groups on different days or with different reagent lots introduces confounders.
## When NOT to Use
- When performing purely observational or descriptive studies (use appropriate survey or cohort design instead)
- When ethical or feasibility constraints prevent randomization (use quasi-experimental design with explicit limitation disclosure)
- When the research question is exploratory/hypothesis-generating (use pilot study design with no inferential statistics)