Skip to content
Back to skills

Dfir Readiness

ASecurity

Use when a project needs DFIR readiness from the security-engineering side: prepare incident evidence handling, chain-of-custody expectations, IOC readiness, and handoff to forensics-complete without collecting evidence.

  • 207 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 1 view
  • Added May 27, 2026
data-aigobashsecurity

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned May 27, 2026

npx -y skills add jmagly/aiwg --skill dfir-readiness --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Dfir Readiness?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Dfir Readiness
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/jmagly-dfir-readiness/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/jmagly-dfir-readiness)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
namespace: aiwg
name: dfir-readiness
platforms: [all]
description: "Use when a project needs DFIR readiness from the security-engineering side: prepare incident evidence handling, chain-of-custody expectations, IOC readiness, and handoff to forensics-complete without collecting evidence."
triggers:
  - "DFIR readiness"
  - "incident response readiness"
  - "evidence preservation readiness"
  - "chain of custody readiness"
  - "IOC readiness"
  - "forensic report readiness"
requires:
  - project-context: repository or workspace that may need evidence-bearing incident response
ensures:
  - boundary-routing: preventive security, production incident management, and forensic investigation responsibilities are separated
  - forensics-handoff: operator is routed to forensics-complete for evidence-bearing work
  - readiness-record: preparation notes can be written under .aiwg/security-engineering/incident-readiness/
invariants:
  - no live evidence collection happens from this skill
  - no containment, cleanup, or destructive action is suggested without explicit operator authorization
  - forensic case artifacts stay under .aiwg/forensics/
---

# DFIR Readiness

Use this skill when a security-engineering conversation turns into incident readiness: evidence handling, chain of custody, IOC workflow, forensic report readiness, or "what should this project have in place before an incident?"

This is a bridge. It prepares and routes. It does not replace `forensics-complete`, and it does not collect evidence.

## Triggers

- "DFIR readiness"
- "incident response readiness"
- "evidence preservation readiness"
- "chain of custody readiness"
- "IOC readiness"
- "forensic report readiness"
- "prepare this project for a breach investigation"
- "start a forensics case safely"
- "what do we need before collecting evidence?"

## Purpose

Make a security project ready to hand off to evidence-preserving DFIR work.

The skill answers three questions:

1. Is this preventive security work, production incident coordination, or a forensic investigation?
2. Is `forensics-complete` installed for evidence-bearing work?
3. What readiness record, custody expectation, and handoff steps should exist before anyone touches volatile or potentially admissible evidence?

## Behavior

### Boundary

| Need | Route |
|---|---|
| Preventive controls, disclosure intake, secure design decisions | `security-engineering` |
| Severity, incident bridge, stakeholder comms, service restoration, PIR | `sdlc-complete` incident-response flows |
| Evidence preservation, triage, acquisition, timelines, IOCs, reports | `forensics-complete` |

If a request includes live evidence, suspected compromise, a target host, IOC extraction, chain of custody, forensic timeline, or report generation, route to `forensics-complete`.

### 1. Classify the situation

Ask only enough to route safely:

- Is there an active incident, or is this readiness planning?
- Is any evidence already collected?
- Are any destructive containment or cleanup actions planned?
- Is legal, compliance, or customer-impact handling in scope?
- Which systems could hold volatile evidence?

Do not ask for secrets, exploit payloads, private vulnerability details, or raw evidence in chat.

### 2. Check for the DFIR framework

Look for `.aiwg/forensics/` or an installed `forensics-complete` entry in `.aiwg/aiwg.config`.

If it is missing, instruct the operator:

```bash
aiwg use forensics
# or
aiwg use dfir
```

Then route through discovery:

```bash
aiwg discover "forensic triage"
aiwg discover "evidence preservation"
aiwg discover "start forensics case"
```

### 3. Create a readiness record

For readiness planning, write or update:

```text
.aiwg/security-engineering/incident-readiness/<system-or-project>.md
```

Use this structure:

```markdown
# DFIR Readiness: <system-or-project>

- Prepared: <date>
- Owner: <person/team>
- Security-engineering record: readiness / review / update
- Forensics workspace installed: yes/no
- Production incident-management route: <SDLC flow or runbook>
- DFIR route: forensics-complete

## Evidence Sources

| Source | Volatility | Owner | Access Method | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| <host/log/cloud/container> | high/medium/low | <team> | <read-only path> | <notes> |

## Chain-of-Custody Expectations

- Master custody log: `.aiwg/forensics/chain-of-custody.md`
- Case evidence root: `.aiwg/forensics/evidence/<case-id>/`
- Hash algorithm: SHA-256 unless a stricter local standard applies
- Transfer logging: required for every evidence handoff

## Safe Start Checklist

- [ ] Confirm authority to investigate.
- [ ] Preserve volatile evidence before low-volatility sources.
- [ ] Avoid cleanup, reboot, patching, or containment unless authorized.
- [ ] Start custody logging before collection.
- [ ] Record production incident handoff if SDLC incident management is active.
- [ ] Route evidence-bearing work to `forensics-complete`.

## Open Gaps

- [ ] <missing access, log source, retention, owner, tooling, legal gate>
```

### 4. Route to the right next skill

Use `aiwg discover` rather than naming non-kernel skills as commands:

```bash
aiwg discover "evidence preservation"
aiwg discover "forensic triage"
aiwg discover "extract iocs"
aiwg discover "build forensic timeline"
aiwg discover "forensic report"
```

For production incident coordination, use:

```bash
aiwg discover "handle incident"
aiwg discover "incident triage"
```

## Safety Rules

- Never modify a suspected evidence source as a readiness step.
- Never recommend reboot, cleanup, quarantine, or credential rotation as a forensic action without explicit operator authorization and custody logging.
- Never paste secrets, exploit payloads, raw private reports, or customer data into public issues or chat.
- If evidence already exists, record who collected it, when, from where, and how integrity was verified before continuing.

## References

- `forensics-complete/skills/forensics-quickref` for DFIR discovery phrases.
- `forensics-complete/skills/evidence-preservation` for custody procedures.
- `sdlc-complete/skills/flow-incident-response` for production incident coordination.
- `docs/integrations/dfir-handoff.md` for cross-framework routing guidance.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…