Skip to content
Back to skills

Test Normalize

ASecurity

Repair and standardize a testing regime through concrete file plans, guarded deployment receipts and repeatable verification of runner and oracle behavior.

  • 211 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 1 view
  • Added September 20, 2026
ai-agentsshelltesting

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 20, 2026

npx -y skills add jmagly/aiwg --skill test-normalize --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Test Normalize?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Test Normalize
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/jmagly-test-normalize/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/jmagly-test-normalize)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
namespace: aiwg
platforms: [all]
version: 2.0.0
name: test-normalize
description: Repair and standardize a testing regime through concrete file plans, guarded deployment receipts and repeatable verification of runner and oracle behavior.
---

# Test normalization

Start from an evidence-backed assessment or a confirmed individual finding. For an unaudited whole testing regime, run
`test-conformance` first. Use [the normalization plan template](../../templates/normalization-plan.md) and the
[workflow](../../docs/conformance-workflow.md).

Select a finite batch and write the intended behavioral acceptance condition. Prioritize fail-open validators, omitted
tests and ineffective gates before cosmetic fixture conventions. Existing authorized cleanup covers necessary reversible
edits; ask only when a concrete step is outside that authorization.

Inspect `templates --action list` for a suitable platform bundle. Use `templates --action develop` to produce a custom
editable bundle when needed, then validate and review it. `templates --action deploy` plans/applies platform files
through the same ownership and receipt rules; provider addon deployment and target test configuration deployment are
separate operations.

Prepare explicit `{path, content}` edits; `content: null` means intentional deletion. Run `plan` to capture complete
before/after state. Review its actual paths and changed behavior, then `apply` within the authorized scope. Preserve the
receipt; changed hashes or receipt collisions require investigation and a new plan, not a forced write. No arbitrary
shell commands belong inside an edit plan.

Run the affected tests and discovery, negative controls, and declared wider verification. Update source-bound reviews
and regenerate the assessment/report. If the batch causes a regression, use `rollback` only while its receipt and
post-apply state remain valid. A partial transaction requires inspection and a fresh recovery plan; rollback refuses
unrelated drift.

Repeat with a new plan and a stated finite batch budget. Stop on conformance, an unresolved external prerequisite, or
budget exhaustion; report remaining findings. Do not silence tests, reduce thresholds or remove required checks to
satisfy the gate. A normalization template standardizes a convention; its successful deployment alone does not prove
real tests.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…