Skip to content
Back to skills

Anomaly Detector

ASecurity

Automated metric anomaly detection and root cause correlation for the Operations department. Monitors system metrics for deviations, correlates anomalies across services, generates alert recommendations, and feeds the ops self-improvement loop. Use when investigating metric spikes, tuning alert thresholds, reducing false positives, or running the operations UAOP pipeline.

  • 6 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 2 views
  • Added September 8, 2026
ai-agentskubernetesgitapidevopsperformance

Works with

  • api
  • mcp

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 8, 2026

npx -y skills add kmshihab7878/claude-code-setup --skill anomaly-detector --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Anomaly Detector?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Anomaly Detector
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/kmshihab7878-anomaly-detector/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/kmshihab7878-anomaly-detector)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: "anomaly-detector"
description: "Automated metric anomaly detection and root cause correlation for the Operations department. Monitors system metrics for deviations, correlates anomalies across services, generates alert recommendations, and feeds the ops self-improvement loop. Use when investigating metric spikes, tuning alert thresholds, reducing false positives, or running the operations UAOP pipeline."
risk: low
tags: [operations, monitoring, observability, alerting]
created: 2026-03-23
updated: 2026-03-23
---

# Anomaly Detector — Operations Intelligence Engine

Automated metric anomaly detection that reduces alert fatigue and catches real problems. UAOP Stage 1 + Stage 5 for Operations.

## When to use

- Investigating a metric spike or deviation
- Tuning alert thresholds to reduce false positives
- Post-incident — "what signals did we miss?"
- Capacity planning — "what's trending toward limits?"
- Weekly ops review — "what's abnormal this week?"

## When NOT to use

- Active incident response (use `production-monitoring` + `incident-responder`)
- Infrastructure changes (use `devops-patterns`)
- Cost analysis (use `cost-optimization`)

## Pipeline

### Step 1: Collect Baseline Metrics

Establish normal ranges for key metrics:

```
SERVICE METRICS (per service):
  - Request rate (req/s) — normal range by hour/day
  - Error rate (%) — normal baseline
  - Latency p50/p95/p99 (ms) — normal range
  - CPU/Memory utilization (%) — normal range
  - Connection pool usage (%) — normal range

INFRASTRUCTURE METRICS:
  - RDS connections active/available
  - Redis memory usage / eviction rate
  - ECS task count / desired vs running
  - Disk I/O / network throughput

BUSINESS METRICS:
  - API key usage patterns
  - Agent execution rate
  - Pipeline stage completion times
```

### Step 2: Detect Anomalies

Apply detection methods:

```
DETECTION RULES:
  Threshold: metric > X for > Y minutes
  Rate of change: metric changed >Z% in T minutes
  Statistical: metric > 2 standard deviations from rolling 7-day average
  Absence: expected metric stopped reporting
  Ratio: error_rate / request_rate > threshold
  Correlation: when metric A spikes AND metric B drops simultaneously
```

### Step 3: Correlate and Triage

```markdown
## Anomaly Report

**Detected:** [timestamp]
**Metric:** [metric name]
**Value:** [current] vs [expected range]
**Deviation:** [X]% above/below normal
**Duration:** [how long anomalous]

### Correlated Signals
| Time | Metric | Value | Normal Range | Correlation |
|------|--------|-------|-------------|-------------|
[other metrics that moved at the same time]

### Probable Root Cause
Based on correlation analysis:
1. [Most likely cause + evidence]
2. [Second most likely + evidence]

### Recommended Action
- Severity: [P0/P1/P2/P3]
- Action: [specific steps]
- Escalation: [who to notify if unresolved in X minutes]

### False Positive Check
- Is this a known pattern? [deploy window / batch job / expected spike]
- Has this threshold fired falsely before? [history]
- Confidence: [HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW]
```

### Step 4: Self-Improvement Loop

```
MEASURE:
  - Alert-to-incident ratio (alerts that were real problems)
  - False positive rate per alert rule
  - MTTD (mean time to detect real issues)
  - Anomalies missed (found in postmortem, not by detector)

REINFORCE:
  - Alert rules with high true-positive rate → keep and tighten
  - Alert rules with >10% false positive rate → retune or remove
  - Correlation patterns that identified root cause → promote

REGENERATE:
  - Update baselines as system evolves
  - Add new metrics when new services deploy
  - Adjust thresholds seasonally (traffic patterns change)
  - Feed postmortem findings into detection rules
```

## Cadence

```
CONTINUOUS: Metric collection and threshold monitoring
DAILY:      Anomaly summary (what deviated from normal)
WEEKLY:     False positive review + threshold tuning
MONTHLY:    Detection effectiveness review + baseline recalibration
```

## Agents

| Agent | Role |
|-------|------|
| performance-engineer (L2) | Owns monitoring strategy |
| observability-engineer (L3) | Configures detection rules, tunes thresholds |
| incident-responder (L4) | Acts on detected anomalies |
| performance-optimizer (L5) | Analyzes trends, recommends capacity changes |
| root-cause-analyst (L5) | Investigates correlated anomalies |

## Tools

| Tool | Purpose |
|------|---------|
| kubernetes MCP | Cluster metrics, pod status |
| github MCP | Deploy history (correlate anomalies with changes) |
| sequential MCP | Multi-step correlation reasoning |
| memory MCP | Store baselines, known patterns, false positive history |

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…