Skip to content
Back to skills

Blueprint Prp Execute

ASecurity

Execute a PRP with validation loop, TDD workflow, and quality gates

  • 58 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 2 views
  • Added February 8, 2026
testingrustgobashgitsecurityperformancedocumentation

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned February 12, 2026

npx -y skills add laurigates/claude-plugins --skill blueprint-prp-execute --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Blueprint Prp Execute?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Blueprint Prp Execute
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/laurigates-blueprint-prp-execute/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/laurigates-blueprint-prp-execute)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
model: opus
description: "Execute a PRP with validation loop, TDD workflow, and quality gates"
args: "[prp-name]"
argument-hint: "Name of PRP to execute (e.g., feature-auth-oauth2)"
allowed-tools: Read, Write, Edit, Glob, Bash, Task, AskUserQuestion
created: 2025-12-16
modified: 2026-02-03
reviewed: 2025-12-16
name: blueprint-prp-execute
---

Execute a PRP (Product Requirement Prompt) with systematic implementation and validation.

**Usage**: `/blueprint:prp-execute [prp-name]`

**Prerequisites**:
- PRP exists in `docs/prps/[prp-name].md`
- Confidence score >= 7 (if lower, suggest `/blueprint:prp-create` refinement)

**Execution Phases**:

## Phase 1: Load Context

### 1.1 Read PRP
```bash
cat docs/prps/$PRP_NAME.md
```

### 1.2 Verify Confidence Score
- If score >= 9: Ready for autonomous execution (or delegation)
- If score 7-8: Proceed with some discovery expected
- If score < 7: **STOP** - Recommend refinement first

### 1.3 Offer Delegation (Confidence >= 9)

**If confidence score >= 9**, the PRP is ready for autonomous execution by a subagent. Offer the user a choice:

```
Use AskUserQuestion:
question: "This PRP has high confidence (score: {score}). How would you like to proceed?"
options:
  - label: "Execute now (current session)"
    description: "Implement the feature in this session with TDD workflow"
  - label: "Create work-order for delegation"
    description: "Generate a work-order that can be executed by a subagent"
  - label: "Create multiple work-orders (break down tasks)"
    description: "Split PRP into separate work-orders for parallel execution"
```

**If "Create work-order"**:
- Run `/blueprint:work-order --from-prp {prp-name}`
- Work-order will include:
  - PRP objective and success criteria
  - Relevant context (files, patterns, ai_docs references)
  - TDD requirements from PRP
  - Clear isolation boundary
- **Exit** after work-order creation (user can execute it later)

**If "Create multiple work-orders"**:
- Analyze the PRP's Implementation Blueprint
- Identify independent tasks that can be parallelized
- For each task, generate a focused work-order
- Report list of created work-orders
- **Exit** - user can delegate these to multiple subagents

**If "Execute now"** or confidence < 9:
- Continue to Phase 2

### 1.5 Read ai_docs References
Load all referenced ai_docs entries for context:
- `ai_docs/libraries/*.md`
- `ai_docs/project/patterns.md`

### 1.6 Plan Execution
Based on the Implementation Blueprint:
1. Create TodoWrite entries for each task
2. Order by dependencies
3. Identify validation checkpoints

## Phase 2: Run Initial Validation Gates

### 2.1 Pre-Implementation Validation
Run validation gates to establish baseline:

```bash
# Gate 1: Ensure linting passes before changes
[linting command from PRP]

# Gate 2: Ensure existing tests pass
[test command from PRP]
```

**Expected**: All gates pass (clean starting state)

**If gates fail**:
- Document existing issues
- Decide whether to fix first or proceed
- Update PRP notes if needed

## Phase 3: TDD Implementation

For each task in Implementation Blueprint:

### 3.1 Write Tests First (RED)

Following TDD Requirements from PRP:

```bash
# Create test file if needed
# Write test case as specified in PRP
```

Run tests:
```bash
[test command]
```

**Expected**: New test FAILS (proves test is meaningful)

### 3.2 Implement Minimal Code (GREEN)

Write minimum code to pass the test:
- Follow patterns from Codebase Intelligence
- Apply patterns from ai_docs
- Watch for Known Gotchas

Run tests:
```bash
[test command]
```

**Expected**: Test PASSES

### 3.3 Refactor (REFACTOR)

Improve code while keeping tests green:
- Extract common patterns
- Improve naming
- Add type hints
- Follow project conventions

Run tests:
```bash
[test command]
```

**Expected**: Tests STILL PASS

### 3.4 Run Validation Gates

After each significant change:

```bash
# Gate 1: Linting
[linting command]

# Gate 2: Type checking
[type check command]

# Gate 3: Unit tests
[test command]
```

**If any gate fails**:
1. Fix the issue
2. Re-run the gate
3. Continue only when passing

### 3.5 Update Progress
Mark task as complete in TodoWrite:
```
✅ Task N: [Description]
```

## Phase 4: Final Validation

### 4.1 Run All Validation Gates

Execute every gate from the PRP:

```bash
# Gate 1: Linting
[linting command]
# Expected: No errors

# Gate 2: Type Checking
[type check command]
# Expected: No errors

# Gate 3: Unit Tests
[unit test command]
# Expected: All pass

# Gate 4: Integration Tests (if applicable)
[integration test command]
# Expected: All pass

# Gate 5: Coverage Check
[coverage command]
# Expected: Meets threshold

# Gate 6: Security Scan (if applicable)
[security command]
# Expected: No high/critical issues
```

### 4.2 Verify Success Criteria

Check each success criterion from PRP:
- [ ] Criterion 1: [verified how]
- [ ] Criterion 2: [verified how]
- [ ] Criterion 3: [verified how]

### 4.3 Check Performance Baselines

If performance baselines defined:
```bash
# Run performance test
[performance command]
```

Compare results to baseline targets.

## Phase 4.5: Deferred Items Report

**Purpose**: Create an audit trail for any items not implemented during this execution.

### 4.5.1 Identify Deferred Items

Review the PRP's Implementation Blueprint and identify:
- **Deferred (Phase 2)** tasks that were not implemented
- **Nice-to-Have** tasks that were skipped
- Any **Required** tasks that couldn't be completed (blockers)

### 4.5.2 Document Deferred Items

Create a deferred items table:

```markdown
### Deferred Items Report

| Item | Category | Reason | Follow-up Action |
|------|----------|--------|------------------|
| [Task name] | Phase 2 | [Why deferred] | GitHub issue |
| [Task name] | Nice-to-Have | Time constraint | None |
| [Task name] | Required (Blocked) | [Blocker description] | GitHub issue |
```

### 4.5.3 Create GitHub Issues for Phase 2 Items

**Required**: All "Deferred (Phase 2)" and "Required (Blocked)" items MUST have GitHub issues created.

For each item requiring an issue:

```bash
gh issue create \
  --title "[PRP Follow-up] [Task name]" \
  --body "## Context
This task was deferred during PRP execution for: **[feature-name]**

**Original PRP**: \`docs/prps/[feature-name].md\`

## Task Description
[Description from PRP]

## Reason Deferred
[Reason from deferred items table]

## Acceptance Criteria
[Relevant criteria from original PRP]

## Labels
- \`deferred-from-prp\`
- \`[priority label if applicable]\`" \
  --label "deferred-from-prp"
```

### 4.5.4 Update PRP with Deferred Items

Add deferred items section to the PRP:

```markdown
## Deferred Items (Post-Execution)

| Item | GitHub Issue | Reason |
|------|--------------|--------|
| [Task] | #[issue-number] | [Reason] |
| [Task] | N/A (Nice-to-Have) | [Reason] |
```

### 4.5.5 Summary Output

Include in execution report:

```markdown
### Deferred Items Summary
- **Phase 2 items deferred**: N (GitHub issues: #X, #Y, #Z)
- **Nice-to-Have skipped**: N
- **Required items blocked**: N (GitHub issues: #A, #B)
```

**Important**: Do not proceed to Phase 5 until all Phase 2 and blocked items have GitHub issues created.

## Phase 5: Sync Feature Tracker

**Purpose**: Automatically keep the feature tracker in sync as features are implemented.

### 5.1 Check if Feature Tracking is Enabled

```bash
# Check if feature tracker exists
test -f docs/blueprint/feature-tracker.json && echo "enabled" || echo "disabled"
```

**If disabled**: Skip to Phase 6 (Report)

### 5.2 Identify Implemented Features

From the PRP's Implementation Blueprint, identify which feature requirement (FR) codes were addressed:
- Extract FR codes from task descriptions (e.g., "FR2.1", "FR2.1.1")
- Map completed tasks to their corresponding features
- Note any features that are now fully complete vs. partially implemented

### 5.3 Update Feature Tracker

For each identified FR code:

1. **Update status**:
   - `complete` if all acceptance criteria verified
   - `partial` if some criteria met but more work needed
   - `in_progress` if work started but not yet passing tests

2. **Update implementation metadata**:
   ```json
   {
     "implementation": {
       "files": ["list of modified/created files"],
       "tests": ["list of test files"],
       "commits": ["commit hash from this PRP execution"],
       "notes": "Brief implementation notes"
     }
   }
   ```

3. **Recalculate statistics**:
   - Update counts for complete/partial/in_progress/not_started
   - Recalculate completion percentage
   - Update phase status if applicable

### 5.4 Sync with Documentation

Update sync targets:

**work-overview.md:**
- Move completed features to "Completed" section
- Update "In Progress" section with partially completed features

**TODO.md:**
- Check boxes for completed features: `[ ]` → `[x]`
- Add notes for partial completion if needed

### 5.5 Feature Sync Summary

Include in execution report:

```markdown
### Feature Tracker Updated
- **Features updated**: {count}
- **Completion**: {complete}/{total} ({percentage}%)
- **Phase {N} status**: {status}

| FR Code | Description | Previous | New |
|---------|-------------|----------|-----|
| FR2.1 | [desc] | not_started | complete |
| FR2.1.1 | [desc] | partial | complete |
```

**Note**: If no FR codes are found in the PRP, skip the sync and note:
```
Feature tracker sync skipped: No FR codes found in this PRP.
Consider adding FR code references to Implementation Blueprint tasks.
```

---

## Phase 6: Report

### 6.1 Execution Summary

Generate completion report:

```markdown
## PRP Execution Complete: [Feature Name]

### Implementation Summary
- **Tasks completed**: X/Y
- **Tests added**: N
- **Files modified**: [list]

### Validation Results

| Gate | Command | Result |
|------|---------|--------|
| Linting | `[cmd]` | ✅ Pass |
| Type Check | `[cmd]` | ✅ Pass |
| Unit Tests | `[cmd]` | ✅ Pass (N tests) |
| Integration | `[cmd]` | ✅ Pass |
| Coverage | `[cmd]` | ✅ 85% (target: 80%) |

### Success Criteria

- [x] Criterion 1: Verified via [method]
- [x] Criterion 2: Verified via [method]
- [x] Criterion 3: Verified via [method]

### Deferred Items Summary
- **Phase 2 items deferred**: N (GitHub issues: #X, #Y, #Z)
- **Nice-to-Have skipped**: N
- **Required items blocked**: N (GitHub issues: #A, #B)

### Feature Tracker Status
- **Features updated**: N
- **Overall completion**: X/Y (Z%)
- **Changes**: FR2.1 (not_started → complete), FR2.1.1 (partial → complete)

### New Gotchas Discovered
[Document any new gotchas for future reference]

### Recommendations
- [Any follow-up work suggested]
- [Updates to ai_docs recommended]

### Ready for:
- [ ] Code review
- [ ] Merge to main branch
```

### 6.2 Update ai_docs

If new patterns or gotchas discovered:
- Update relevant ai_docs entries
- Create new entries if needed
- Document lessons learned

### 6.3 Mark PRP Complete

Move or annotate PRP as executed:
```markdown
## Status: EXECUTED
**Executed on**: [date]
**Commit**: [hash]
**Notes**: [any notes]
```

## Error Handling

### Validation Gate Failure
1. Identify the failing check
2. Analyze the error message
3. Fix the issue
4. Re-run the gate
5. Continue when passing

### Test Failure Loop
If stuck in RED phase (test keeps failing):
1. Review Known Gotchas in PRP
2. Check ai_docs for patterns
3. Search codebase for similar implementations
4. Ask user for clarification if blocked

### Low Confidence Areas
When encountering areas not covered by PRP:
1. Document the gap
2. Research as needed
3. Update PRP for future reference
4. Proceed with best judgment

### Blocked Progress
If unable to proceed:
1. Document the blocker
2. Create work-order for blocker resolution
3. Report to user with options

### 6.4 Prompt for next action (use AskUserQuestion):

```
question: "PRP execution complete. What would you like to do next?"
options:
  - label: "Commit changes (Recommended)"
    description: "Create a commit with conventional message for this feature"
  - label: "Create work-order for follow-up"
    description: "Package remaining work or enhancements"
  - label: "Update ai_docs"
    description: "Document new patterns or gotchas discovered"
  - label: "Continue to next PRP"
    description: "If there are more PRPs to execute"
  - label: "I'm done for now"
    description: "Exit - changes are saved locally"
```

**Based on selection:**
- "Commit changes" → Run `/git:commit` or guide through commit
- "Create work-order" → Run `/blueprint:work-order`
- "Update ai_docs" → Run `/blueprint:curate-docs` for relevant patterns
- "Continue to next PRP" → List available PRPs and run `/blueprint:prp-execute [next]`
- "I'm done" → Exit

**Tips**:
- Trust the PRP - it was researched for a reason
- Run validation gates frequently (not just at the end)
- Document any new gotchas discovered
- Update ai_docs with lessons learned
- Commit after each passing validation cycle

## Agent Teams (Optional)

For large multi-module PRPs, spawn teammates per module with a shared task list:

| Teammate | Focus | Value |
|----------|-------|-------|
| Module A implementer | Implement module A tasks from blueprint | Parallel implementation |
| Module B implementer | Implement module B tasks from blueprint | Parallel implementation |
| Validation runner | Run gates continuously as teammates complete tasks | Continuous quality feedback |

Use this when the PRP's Implementation Blueprint has clearly independent modules. Each teammate works on its module while the shared task list tracks overall progress. This is optional — single-session execution works for smaller PRPs.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…