Skip to content
Back to skills

Code Review

ASecurity

Perform comprehensive code review with automated fixes

  • 58 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 3 views
  • Added February 8, 2026
code-qualitytypescriptpythonrustgoawscode-reviewsecurityperformance

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned February 12, 2026

npx -y skills add laurigates/claude-plugins --skill code-review --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Code Review?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Code Review
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/laurigates-code-review/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/laurigates-code-review)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
model: opus
created: 2025-12-16
modified: 2026-01-25
reviewed: 2026-01-25
allowed-tools: Task, TodoWrite, Glob, Read
description: Perform comprehensive code review with automated fixes
argument-hint: "[PATH]"
name: code-review
---

## Context

- Review path: `$1` (defaults to current directory if not specified)

## Parameters

- `$1`: Path to review (defaults to current directory)

## Your task

**Delegate this task to the `code-review` agent.**

Use the Task tool with `subagent_type: code-review` to perform a comprehensive code review.

First, use the Glob tool to discover source files to review:
- `**/*.py`, `**/*.js`, `**/*.ts`, `**/*.go`, `**/*.rs` for source files
- `**/*test*` patterns for test files
Then pass the discovered files to the agent.

The code-review agent should:

1. **Analyze code quality**:
   - Naming conventions and readability
   - Code structure and maintainability
   - SOLID principles adherence

2. **Security assessment**:
   - Input validation vulnerabilities
   - Authentication and authorization issues
   - Secrets and sensitive data exposure

3. **Performance evaluation**:
   - Bottlenecks and inefficiencies
   - Memory usage patterns
   - Optimization opportunities

4. **Architecture review**:
   - Design patterns usage
   - Component coupling
   - Dependency management

5. **Test coverage gaps**:
   - Missing test cases
   - Edge cases not covered
   - Integration test needs

6. **Apply fixes** where appropriate and safe

7. **Generate report** with:
   - Summary of issues found/fixed
   - Remaining manual interventions needed
   - Improvement recommendations

Provide the agent with:
- The review path from context
- Project type (language/framework)
- Any specific focus areas requested

The agent has expertise in:
- Multi-language code analysis (Python, TypeScript, Go, Rust)
- LSP integration for accurate diagnostics
- Security vulnerability patterns (OWASP)
- Performance analysis and optimization

## Agent Teams (Optional)

For comprehensive review of large codebases, spawn specialized review teammates in parallel:

| Teammate | Focus | Value |
|----------|-------|-------|
| Security reviewer | OWASP, secrets, auth flaws | Deep security analysis without blocking quality review |
| Performance reviewer | N+1 queries, algorithmic complexity, resource leaks | Performance-focused review in parallel |
| Correctness reviewer | Logic errors, edge cases, type safety | Functional correctness in parallel |

This is optional — the skill works without agent teams for standard reviews.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…