Skip to content
Back to skills

Dispatching Parallel Agents

ASecurity

Use when facing 2+ independent tasks that can be worked on without shared state or sequential dependencies

  • 4 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 1 view
  • Added June 4, 2026
testingtypescriptgotesting

Works with

  • claude code

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned June 4, 2026

npx -y skills add lidge-jun/cli-jaw-skills --skill dispatching-parallel-agents --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Dispatching Parallel Agents?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Dispatching Parallel Agents
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/lidge-jun-dispatching-parallel-agents/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/lidge-jun-dispatching-parallel-agents)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: dispatching-parallel-agents
description: Use when facing 2+ independent tasks that can be worked on without shared state or sequential dependencies
---

# Dispatching Parallel Agents

Core principle: dispatch one agent per independent problem domain. Let them work concurrently.

## When to Use

- 3+ test files failing with different root causes
- Multiple subsystems broken independently
- Each problem can be understood without context from others
- No shared state between investigations

## Prefer Sequential When

- Failures may be related (fixing one might fix others)
- Full system context is needed
- Agents would edit the same files

## The Pattern

### 1. Identify Independent Domains

Group failures by what's broken:
- File A tests: Tool approval flow
- File B tests: Batch completion behavior
- File C tests: Abort functionality

Each domain is independent - fixing tool approval doesn't affect abort tests.

### 2. Create Focused Agent Tasks

Each agent gets:
- **Specific scope:** One test file or subsystem
- **Clear goal:** Make these tests pass
- **Constraints:** Don't change other code
- **Expected output:** Summary of what you found and fixed

### 3. Dispatch in Parallel

```typescript
// In Claude Code / AI environment
Task("Fix agent-tool-abort.test.ts failures")
Task("Fix batch-completion-behavior.test.ts failures")
Task("Fix tool-approval-race-conditions.test.ts failures")
// All three run concurrently
```

### 4. Review and Integrate

When agents return:
- Read each summary
- Verify fixes don't conflict
- Run full test suite
- Integrate all changes

## Agent Prompt Structure

Good agent prompts are:
1. **Focused** - One clear problem domain
2. **Self-contained** - All context needed to understand the problem
3. **Specific about output** - What should the agent return?

```markdown
Fix the 3 failing tests in src/agents/agent-tool-abort.test.ts:

1. "should abort tool with partial output capture" - expects 'interrupted at' in message
2. "should handle mixed completed and aborted tools" - fast tool aborted instead of completed
3. "should properly track pendingToolCount" - expects 3 results but gets 0

These are timing/race condition issues. Your task:

1. Read the test file and understand what each test verifies
2. Identify root cause - timing issues or actual bugs?
3. Fix by:
   - Replacing arbitrary timeouts with event-based waiting
   - Fixing bugs in abort implementation if found
   - Adjusting test expectations if testing changed behavior

Do NOT just increase timeouts - find the real issue.

Return: Summary of what you found and what you fixed.
```

## Prompt Quality Checklist

| Quality | Bad | Good |
|---------|-----|------|
| Scope | "Fix all the tests" | "Fix agent-tool-abort.test.ts" |
| Context | "Fix the race condition" | Paste error messages and test names |
| Constraints | (none — agent refactors everything) | "Fix tests only, no production code changes" |
| Output | "Fix it" | "Return summary of root cause and changes" |

## Verification

After agents return:
1. Review each summary — understand what changed
2. Check for conflicts — did agents edit the same code?
3. Run full suite — verify all fixes work together
4. Spot-check — agents can make systematic errors

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…