Skip to content
Back to skills

Implement

ASecurity

Implement a single ticket or a small inline change in one pass, in this session.

  • 2 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 1 view
  • Added September 3, 2026
ai-agentstestingcode-review

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 20, 2026

npx -y skills add lttr/claude-marketplace --skill implement --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Implement?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Implement
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/lttr-implement/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/lttr-implement)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: implement
description: Implement a single ticket or a small inline change in one pass, in this session.
disable-model-invocation: true
argument-hint: [ticket-path-or-description]
---

# Implement

Follows the `aiwork-protocol` skill. Don't enter plan mode — the ticket is the plan. One work item, one pass, this session; for a whole spec with a ticket graph use `/implement-spec`.

## Resolve input

`$ARGUMENTS` is one of:

- **Ticket path**: use directly. Verify the ticket is `status: ready` and every `blocked_by` ticket is `status: done`; if not, warn and ask.
- **Inline description**: if trivial (fits one session, obvious approach), treat it as the work item. If non-trivial, stop and suggest `/to-spec`.
- **Spec/PRD or task folder path**: if it has a `tickets/` folder, or is too big for one pass, stop and suggest `/implement-spec`. A small ticketless spec is a valid work item: take it.

## Do

1. Set ticket `status: in-progress` (if working from a ticket).
2. Implement. Use `/tdd` where possible, at the seams recorded in the spec's Testing Decisions section.
3. Tidy the diff yourself — naming, duplication, dead scaffolding. Not `/simplify`: its reviewers would rediscover context you already have. Skip for a mechanical edit.
4. Run the project's check command (see its scripts). Green before anything below.
5. Run `/verify <ticket-path>` so it verifies the ticket's acceptance criteria, not just the diff. Check off `- [ ]` → `- [x]` for each criterion it passed.
6. Run `/code-review low --fix`. Re-run the checks if it changed code.
7. Set ticket `status: done` and `verified:` to the passes that ran (`checks`, `behaviour`, `ux`, `review`), then commit. Do not ask. Report what was done and anything left open.

When the work item is a whole spec rather than a ticket, the same upkeep applies to the spec's own `status` if it carries one: `in-progress` at the start, `agent-done` at the end. Never `done`: that is the human's sign-off once they have checked the feature, the UX and the code. Say so when you report. A single ticket finishing says nothing about its spec, so leave the spec's status alone in that case.

Stopping is hooked: the plugin's `verified-gate` holds the turn when a ticket claims `done` without an on-app pass (`behaviour`, `ux` or `human` in `verified:`) or with unticked acceptance criteria. Set the frontmatter because the passes ran, never to get past the hook. If a pass genuinely cannot run, leave the ticket `in-progress` and say why in `implementation-notes.md`. See `/aiwork:implement-spec` for details.

Record a note in the task folder's `implementation-notes.md` per `aiwork-protocol` when the reader must act on it: work only a human can finish, anything left unverified, a spec ambiguity you resolved, a deliberate deviation. A few sentences, never a log of what you built. Nothing to note is the normal case.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…