Use when implementing closed-loop agent verification — deployed app behaving is the ONLY signal that closes the loop; runtime verifiers drive live app; mocks prove nothing. Triggers on "closed loop verifier", "deployed app verification", "runtime verification", "not mocks", "screenshot driven testing".
Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Closed Loop Verifier Pattern?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/majinmagros-closed-loop-verifier-pattern)
---
name: closed-loop-verifier-pattern
description: Use when implementing closed-loop agent verification — deployed app behaving is the ONLY signal that closes the loop; runtime verifiers drive live app; mocks prove nothing. Triggers on "closed loop verifier", "deployed app verification", "runtime verification", "not mocks", "screenshot driven testing".
metadata:
origin: ECC
source_docs:
- https://github.com/testsprite/testsprite-cli
- https://playwright.dev
- https://pptr.dev
video_source: "EIiXhCaZ4rw - I Mathematically CALCULATED the worth of Codex & Claude Code PLANS (AI Code King)"
related_skills:
- testsprite-cli-integration
- loop-design-check
- verification-loop
- gan-style-harness
- agent-guardrails
- outcome-rubric-verification
---
# Skill: closed-loop-verifier-pattern — O Único Sinal que Fecha o Loop
> **"A green run on the agent's own machine proves nothing. The one signal that actually closes the loop: the deployed thing behaving for a real user."** — AI Code King
Runtime verifiers (TestSprite, Playwright, Puppeteer) drive o **app deployed como usuário real**, capturam screenshot de falha, permitem patch + rerun. Implementação em `references/implementation.md`.
## Quando usar
- Você tem **agent loops** que precisam de verificação real (não mocks)
- Quer provar que **checkout flow, forms, navigation, auth** funcionam de verdade
- Precisa de **screenshot-driven debugging**: ver exatamente o que usuário vê
- Quer **auto-patch + rerun** quando verifier detecta falha
- Está construindo **gan-harness** com verificação de runtime
- Precisa eliminar "green on mocks, broken in prod"
## Quando NÃO usar
- Testes unitários/integração tradicionais → use pytest/Jest/Vitest
- Visual regression only → use Playwright/Percy/Chromatic
- Load/performance testing → use k6/Locust
- Mock-based testing é suficiente → use testing library padrão
- Verificação design-time → use `verification-loop`, `loop-design-check`
---
## Conceito Central
```
TRADICIONAL (quebrado): Generate → Test (mocks) → Pass (green) → Deploy 💥
CLOSED-LOOP (correto): Generate → Deploy (real) → Verify (real) → PASS (real)
↓ FAIL
screenshot + patch → rerun
```
`ClosedLoopAgent.run()`: generate (informado por falhas anteriores) → deploy real → verifier drive o app → PASS? ship : captura falha para a próxima iteração. Ver `references/implementation.md` (`RuntimeVerifier` ABC, `ClosedLoopAgent`, `TestSpriteVerifier`, `PlaywrightVerifier`, specs prontas de checkout/auth/form, config GAN).
```bash
# Como eval-mode no gan-harness:
/gan-build "build checkout flow" --eval-mode testsprite \
--eval-config testsprite.config.json --max-iterations 5 --pass-threshold 1.0
```
---
## Anti-Patterns