Use after writing a new skill and/or when testing existing skills, creating skill evaluations, or verifying skills work under pressure - applies TDD/RED-GREEN-REFACTOR to skill documentation by running baseline tests, measuring compliance, and closing rationalization loopholes
Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Collection?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/mattnigh-collection-e74b3f05)
---
name: testing-skills-with-subagents
description: Use after writing a new skill and/or when testing existing skills, creating skill evaluations, or verifying skills work under pressure - applies TDD/RED-GREEN-REFACTOR to skill documentation by running baseline tests, measuring compliance, and closing rationalization loopholes
---
# Testing Skills With Subagents
## Overview
**Testing skills is just TDD applied to process documentation.**
Choose your testing approach based on development phase:
- **Fast variant**: Quick iteration during skill development (15-30 min)
- **Slow variant**: Rigorous validation before deployment (45-90 min)
**Announce at start:** "I'm using the testing-skills-with-subagents skill."
## Workflow
Follow this workflow exactly - do not skip steps:
```mermaid
graph TD
a@{ shape: stadium, label: "Start: Announce Skill Usage" }
b@{ shape: rect, label: "Ask Variant Question" }
c@{ shape: diam, label: "Variant Choice?" }
d@{ shape: rect, label: "Read variants/fast-conversational.md" }
e@{ shape: rect, label: "Read variants/slow-isolated.md" }
f@{ shape: stadium, label: "Execute Variant Workflow" }
a --> b
b --> c
c -->|Fast| d
c -->|Slow| e
d --> f
e --> f
classDef start fill:#ccffcc
classDef decision fill:#ffffcc
classDef action fill:#ccccff
a:::start
c:::decision
b:::action
d:::action
e:::action
f:::start
```
**Design Rationale:** Mermaid flowchart provides visual enforcement of workflow sequence, preventing LLM from skipping announcement or variant question.
## Step 1: Choose Testing Variant
<critical-instruction>
Use the AskUserQuestion tool with these exact parameters:
</critical-instruction>
**Question:** "Which testing variant do you want to use?"
**Options:**
1. **"Fast: Conversational testing with control scenarios"** - 15-30 min iteration, lightweight logging, good for skill development
2. **"Slow: Worktree-based isolated testing"** - 45-90 min validation, full infrastructure, deployment-ready confidence
**Trade-offs:**
| Aspect | Fast Variant | Slow Variant |
|--------|-------------|--------------|
| Time | 15-30 min | 45-90 min |
| Infrastructure | Lightweight logs | Full worktree isolation |
| Confidence | Moderate | High (deployment-ready) |
| Best For | Iteration, hypothesis testing | Pre-deployment validation |
## Step 2: Execute Selected Variant
<critical-instruction>
Based on the user's variant choice from Step 1:
**IF user selected "Fast: Conversational testing":**
- Read the file: [variants/fast-conversational.md](variants/fast-conversational.md)
- Follow ALL instructions in that file
**IF user selected "Slow: Worktree-based testing":**
- Read the file: [variants/slow-isolated.md](variants/slow-isolated.md)
- Follow ALL instructions in that file
Do NOT proceed without reading the selected variant file.
</critical-instruction>
## Error Handling
**If variant file doesn't exist:**
Display this error message:
```text
❌ Error: Variant file not found
Expected file: variants/{variant-name}.md
This indicates incomplete skill installation. Please check:
1. File structure is correct (.claude/skills/testing-skills-with-subagents/variants/)
2. Variant files exist (fast-conversational.md, slow-isolated.md)
3. Repository is up to date
Cannot proceed without variant file.
```
**Design Rationale:**
- `<critical-instruction>` tags ensure LLM doesn't skip file read
- Context passed forward but doesn't override variant's workflow
- Clear error message for missing files