Skip to content
Back to skills

Github Workflow

ASecurity

GitHub best practices for pull requests, code reviews, issues, Actions workflows, and repository management

  • 248 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 7 views
  • Added February 10, 2026
documentationgosqlnodetestinggitapifrontendbackendci/cdsecurity

Works with

  • api

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned February 12, 2026

npx -y skills add Mindrally/skills --skill github-workflow --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Github Workflow?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Github Workflow
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/mindrally-github-workflow/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/mindrally-github-workflow)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: github-workflow
description: GitHub best practices for pull requests, code reviews, issues, Actions workflows, and repository management
---

# GitHub Workflow Best Practices

You are an expert in GitHub workflows, including pull requests, code reviews, GitHub Actions, issue management, and repository best practices.

## Core Principles

- Use pull requests for all code changes to enable review and discussion
- Automate workflows with GitHub Actions for CI/CD
- Maintain clear issue tracking and project management
- Follow security best practices for repository access and secrets
- Document repositories thoroughly with README and contributing guidelines

## Pull Request Best Practices

### Creating Effective Pull Requests

1. **Keep PRs small and focused**
   - One feature or fix per PR
   - Aim for under 400 lines of changes when possible
   - Split large features into stacked PRs

2. **Write descriptive PR titles**
   - Use conventional commit style: `feat: add user authentication`
   - Be specific about what the PR accomplishes

3. **PR Description Template**
   ```markdown
   ## Summary
   Brief description of changes and motivation.

   ## Changes
   - Bullet points of specific changes made

   ## Testing
   - How the changes were tested
   - Steps to reproduce/verify

   ## Related Issues
   Closes #123

   ## Screenshots (if applicable)
   ```

4. **Link related issues**
   - Use `Closes #123` or `Fixes #123` to auto-close issues
   - Reference related issues with `#123`

### Stacked Pull Requests

For complex features, use stacked PRs:

1. Create a base feature branch
2. Create subsequent PRs that build on each other
3. Merge in order from base to top
4. Keep each PR small and reviewable

## Code Review Guidelines

### As a Reviewer

1. **Review promptly** - Respond within 24 hours when possible
2. **Be constructive** - Focus on improvement, not criticism
3. **Ask questions** - Seek to understand before suggesting changes
4. **Prioritize feedback**:
   - Blocking: Security issues, bugs, breaking changes
   - Important: Performance, maintainability
   - Nice-to-have: Style preferences, minor improvements

### Comment Conventions

Use prefixes to indicate comment severity:

- `blocking:` Must be addressed before merge
- `suggestion:` Recommended improvement
- `question:` Seeking clarification
- `nit:` Minor style or preference (optional to address)
- `praise:` Positive feedback on good code

### Example Review Comments

```
blocking: This SQL query is vulnerable to injection.
Please use parameterized queries.

suggestion: Consider extracting this logic into a separate
function for better testability.

nit: Prefer `const` over `let` here since this value
is never reassigned.
```

### Approval Criteria

- All blocking comments addressed
- Tests pass
- CI/CD checks pass
- At least one approval from code owner

## GitHub Actions

### Workflow Best Practices

1. **Use workflow templates**
   ```yaml
   name: CI
   on:
     push:
       branches: [main]
     pull_request:
       branches: [main]

   jobs:
     build:
       runs-on: ubuntu-latest
       steps:
         - uses: actions/checkout@v4
         - name: Setup Node.js
           uses: actions/setup-node@v4
           with:
             node-version: '20'
             cache: 'npm'
         - run: npm ci
         - run: npm test
   ```

2. **Cache dependencies**
   ```yaml
   - uses: actions/cache@v4
     with:
       path: ~/.npm
       key: ${{ runner.os }}-node-${{ hashFiles('**/package-lock.json') }}
   ```

3. **Use reusable workflows**
   ```yaml
   jobs:
     call-workflow:
       uses: ./.github/workflows/reusable.yml
       with:
         environment: production
       secrets: inherit
   ```

4. **Set appropriate timeouts**
   ```yaml
   jobs:
     build:
       timeout-minutes: 10
   ```

### Security in Actions

- Use `secrets` for sensitive data
- Pin action versions with SHA: `uses: actions/checkout@a5ac7e51b41094c92402da3b24376905380afc29`
- Limit `GITHUB_TOKEN` permissions
- Review third-party actions before use

```yaml
permissions:
  contents: read
  pull-requests: write
```

## Issue Management

### Issue Templates

Create `.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/` with templates:

**Bug Report:**
```markdown
---
name: Bug Report
about: Report a bug
labels: bug
---

## Description
Clear description of the bug.

## Steps to Reproduce
1. Step one
2. Step two

## Expected Behavior
What should happen.

## Actual Behavior
What actually happens.

## Environment
- OS:
- Browser:
- Version:
```

**Feature Request:**
```markdown
---
name: Feature Request
about: Suggest a new feature
labels: enhancement
---

## Problem
Describe the problem this feature would solve.

## Proposed Solution
Describe your proposed solution.

## Alternatives Considered
Other approaches you've considered.
```

### Labels

Use consistent labels:
- `bug`, `enhancement`, `documentation`
- `good first issue`, `help wanted`
- `priority: high`, `priority: medium`, `priority: low`
- `status: in progress`, `status: blocked`

## Repository Management

### Branch Protection Rules

Configure for main branch:
- Require pull request reviews
- Require status checks to pass
- Require conversation resolution
- Require signed commits (optional)
- Restrict force pushes

### CODEOWNERS File

```
# .github/CODEOWNERS
* @default-team
/docs/ @docs-team
/src/api/ @backend-team
*.js @frontend-team
```

### Security Best Practices

1. **Enable security features**
   - Dependabot alerts and updates
   - Code scanning with CodeQL
   - Secret scanning

2. **Manage secrets properly**
   - Use repository or organization secrets
   - Rotate secrets regularly
   - Never commit secrets to code

3. **Access control**
   - Use teams for permissions
   - Follow principle of least privilege
   - Audit access regularly

## Automation Recommendations

### Auto-merge for Dependabot

```yaml
name: Dependabot auto-merge
on: pull_request

permissions:
  contents: write
  pull-requests: write

jobs:
  dependabot:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    if: github.actor == 'dependabot[bot]'
    steps:
      - name: Auto-merge minor updates
        run: gh pr merge --auto --squash "$PR_URL"
        env:
          PR_URL: ${{ github.event.pull_request.html_url }}
          GH_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
```

### Release Automation

Use semantic-release or release-please for automated releases based on conventional commits.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…