Skip to content
Back to skills

Brag Doc

ASecurity

Keep a running brag document of your accomplishments so reviews and promo cases write themselves. Use when asked to start or update a brag doc, log a win, track accomplishments, or prep evidence for a review/promotion. Produces a structured, dated accomplishment log — impact-first entries with metrics, scope, and the evidence link — grouped so it drops straight into a self-review or promo packet.

  • 1,330 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added September 3, 2026
ai-agentsgogit

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 3, 2026

npx -y skills add mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills --skill brag-doc --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Brag Doc?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Brag Doc
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/mohitagw15856-brag-doc/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/mohitagw15856-brag-doc)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: brag-doc
description: "Keep a running brag document of your accomplishments so reviews and promo cases write themselves. Use when asked to start or update a brag doc, log a win, track accomplishments, or prep evidence for a review/promotion. Produces a structured, dated accomplishment log — impact-first entries with metrics, scope, and the evidence link — grouped so it drops straight into a self-review or promo packet."
homepage: https://mohitagw15856.github.io/pm-claude-skills/skill/brag-doc.html
metadata:
  {
    "openclaw": { "emoji": "🧭" }
  }
---

# Brag Doc Skill

Nobody remembers in December what they shipped in March — so good work goes uncredited at review time.
A brag doc is the fix: a running, dated log of what you did and the impact it had, captured while it's
fresh. This skill turns a pile of "stuff I did" into impact-first entries you can paste straight into a
[`self-review`](../self-review/SKILL.md) or [`promotion-packet`](../promotion-packet/SKILL.md).

## Required Inputs

Ask for these only if they aren't already provided:

- **The win(s)** — what you did (rough notes are fine; the skill structures them).
- **Impact** — the outcome and any metric (before → after, time saved, revenue, users) — even a rough one.
- **Scope & role** — your specific contribution vs. the team's, and who it affected.
- **Date / period** and any **evidence** (PR, doc, dashboard, kudos, ticket link).

## Output Format

### Brag Doc — [your name], [period]

Entries newest-first, grouped by theme (or quarter). Each entry is **impact-first**:

> **[Verb-led headline — the outcome, not the task]** · *[date]*
> - **What I did:** [the specific action and your role in it]
> - **Impact:** [metric / outcome — before → after where possible]
> - **Scope:** [who/what it affected — team, org, customers]
> - **Evidence:** [link]
> - **Maps to:** [the competency / ladder level it demonstrates — e.g. "cross-team influence"]

Example:

> **Cut onboarding drop-off 18% → 9%, unlocking ~$140k ARR** · *Mar 2026*
> - **What I did:** led the redesign of the 3-step signup flow; wrote the PRD, drove eng + design alignment.
> - **Impact:** activation 41% → 52%; drop-off halved (measured over 6 wks, 20k users).
> - **Scope:** owned end-to-end; affected all new signups.
> - **Evidence:** [PRD] · [dashboard]
> - **Maps to:** drives measurable product outcomes; cross-functional leadership.

End with a **"Themes this period"** summary — the 3–4 narrative threads your wins ladder up to.

## Quality Checks

- [ ] Every entry leads with **impact/outcome**, not the activity
- [ ] Metrics include the baseline (before → after), not a bare percentage
- [ ] Your specific contribution is distinguished from the team's
- [ ] Each entry links real evidence
- [ ] Entries are tagged to a competency/ladder level, so the doc feeds a review or promo case directly

## Anti-Patterns

- [ ] Do not log tasks ("attended planning", "wrote code") — log outcomes ("shipped X, which moved Y")
- [ ] Do not wait until review season — capture wins within a week, while the metrics and context are fresh
- [ ] Do not inflate or claim team wins as solo — overstated credit is worse than none when a manager checks
- [ ] Do not omit the metric because it's imperfect — a rough, labelled estimate beats "improved things"
- [ ] Do not bury the evidence — an unlinked claim is one a busy manager can't verify or champion

## Based On

Brag-document practice (Julia Evans) and impact-first accomplishment tracking.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…