Skip to content
Back to skills

Ux Review

ASecurity

Multi-perspective UX review combining usability, accessibility, and interaction design analysis.

  • 37 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 2 views
  • Added February 7, 2026
designgotestingdocumentation

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned February 12, 2026

npx -y skills add NickCrew/claude-cortex --skill ux-review --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Ux Review?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Ux Review
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/nickcrew-ux-review/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/nickcrew-ux-review)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: ux-review
description: Multi-perspective UX review combining usability, accessibility, and interaction design analysis.
keywords:
  - ux
  - usability
  - user experience
  - design review
  - heuristics
triggers:
  - ux review
  - usability review
  - design critique
  - user experience analysis
  - heuristic evaluation
---

# UX Review Skill

Comprehensive user experience review that coordinates multiple UX perspectives for thorough analysis of components, flows, or features.

## When to Use This Skill

- Reviewing new components or features before release
- Evaluating existing flows for usability issues
- PR reviews that touch UI/UX
- Design system component reviews
- Onboarding flow optimization
- Form and checkout flow analysis

## Review Framework

### Phase 1: Initial Assessment

**Context Gathering**:
1. What is the user trying to accomplish?
2. What is the component's role in the larger flow?
3. Who are the target users?
4. What are the success criteria?

**Heuristic Scan** (Nielsen's 10):
- Visibility of system status
- Match between system and real world
- User control and freedom
- Consistency and standards
- Error prevention
- Recognition rather than recall
- Flexibility and efficiency of use
- Aesthetic and minimalist design
- Help users recognize and recover from errors
- Help and documentation

### Phase 2: Multi-Perspective Analysis

#### UX Designer Perspective

| Category | Key Questions |
|----------|---------------|
| User Flow | Is the path to completion clear and efficient? |
| Information Architecture | Is content organized logically? |
| Cognitive Load | Is the interface overwhelming? |
| Error Prevention | Are mistakes prevented before they happen? |
| Mental Models | Does it work like users expect? |

#### Accessibility Expert Perspective

| Category | Key Questions |
|----------|---------------|
| WCAG 2.1 AA | Does it meet basic compliance? |
| Keyboard Navigation | Can everything be done without a mouse? |
| Screen Reader | Is the experience equivalent? |
| Color Contrast | Are all text/UI elements visible? |
| Focus Management | Is focus handled correctly? |

#### Interaction Designer Perspective

| Category | Key Questions |
|----------|---------------|
| State Coverage | Are all states handled (loading, empty, error, success)? |
| Feedback | Does the user know their action worked? |
| Micro-interactions | Are small details polished? |
| Transitions | Are animations purposeful and smooth? |
| Progressive Disclosure | Is complexity revealed appropriately? |

### Phase 3: Synthesis & Recommendations

Categorize findings by priority:

1. **Critical Issues**: Must fix for usability/accessibility
2. **High Priority**: Significantly impacts user experience
3. **Enhancements**: Would improve delight and efficiency
4. **Future Considerations**: Long-term improvements

## Output Template

```markdown
## UX Review: [Component/Flow Name]

### Summary
[2-3 sentence executive summary of overall UX quality and key findings]

### Critical Issues
- [ ] Issue 1: [Description and impact]
- [ ] Issue 2: [Description and impact]

### Recommendations by Category

#### Usability
| Finding | Impact | Recommendation |
|---------|--------|----------------|
| [Issue] | [High/Medium/Low] | [Fix] |

#### Accessibility
| Finding | WCAG Criterion | Recommendation |
|---------|----------------|----------------|
| [Issue] | [2.x.x Level] | [Fix] |

#### Interaction Design
| Finding | Impact | Recommendation |
|---------|--------|----------------|
| [Issue] | [High/Medium/Low] | [Fix] |

### Implementation Priority
1. **Critical fixes** (do first): [List]
2. **High-priority improvements**: [List]
3. **Enhancement opportunities**: [List]

### Next Steps
1. Create issues/tasks for critical findings
2. Add accessibility requirements to acceptance criteria
3. Update component documentation with UX guidelines
4. Schedule follow-up review after fixes
```

## Focus Area Deep Dives

### Usability Focus (`--focus=ux`)
- User flow mapping and optimization
- Task completion efficiency
- Error recovery patterns
- Learnability assessment
- Memory load reduction

### Accessibility Focus (`--focus=a11y`)
- WCAG 2.1 AA compliance audit
- Keyboard navigation testing
- Screen reader compatibility
- Color contrast verification
- Focus management review

### Interaction Focus (`--focus=interaction`)
- State coverage audit
- Feedback timing analysis
- Micro-interaction opportunities
- Animation review
- Progressive disclosure evaluation

## Success Indicators

- All critical usability issues identified
- Accessibility compliance gaps documented
- Interaction design improvements suggested
- Clear prioritization of fixes
- Actionable recommendations provided

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…