Skip to content
Back to skills

Nw Quality Validation

ASecurity

Type-specific validation checklists, six quality characteristics, and quality gate thresholds for documentation assessment

  • 615 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 1 view
  • Added September 5, 2026
ai-agentsgotestingdocumentation

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 5, 2026

npx -y skills add nWave-ai/nWave --skill nw-quality-validation --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Nw Quality Validation?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Nw Quality Validation
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/nwave-ai-nw-quality-validation-nwave/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/nwave-ai-nw-quality-validation-nwave)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: nw-quality-validation
description: Type-specific validation checklists, six quality characteristics, and quality gate thresholds for documentation assessment
user-invocable: false
disable-model-invocation: true
---

# Quality Validation

## Six Quality Characteristics

- **Accuracy**: Factually correct, technically sound, current | Validation: expert review, automated testing
- **Completeness**: All necessary info present for doc type | Validation: checklist, gap analysis
- **Clarity**: Easy to understand, logical flow, appropriate level | Validation: Flesch 70-80
- **Consistency**: Uniform terminology, formatting, structure | Validation: style guide compliance
- **Correctness**: Proper grammar, spelling, punctuation | Validation: automated check, zero errors
- **Usability**: User achieves goal efficiently | Validation: task success, DIVIO type purpose served

## Quality Gate Thresholds

| Metric | Threshold |
|--------|-----------|
| Readability (Flesch) | 70-80 |
| Spelling errors | 0 |
| Broken links | 0 |
| Style compliance | 95%+ |
| Type purity | 80%+ single type |

## Type-Specific Validation Checklists

### Tutorial Checklist
- [ ] Completable without external references | [ ] Steps numbered and sequential
- [ ] Each step has verifiable outcome | [ ] No assumed prior knowledge | [ ] Builds confidence

### How-to Checklist
- [ ] Clear goal stated upfront | [ ] Assumes fundamentals known
- [ ] Single task focus | [ ] Ends with completion indicator | [ ] No basics teaching

### Reference Checklist
- [ ] All parameters documented | [ ] Return values specified
- [ ] Error conditions listed | [ ] Examples per entry | [ ] No narrative

### Explanation Checklist
- [ ] Addresses "why" not "what" | [ ] Provides context and reasoning
- [ ] Discusses alternatives | [ ] No task steps | [ ] Builds conceptual model

## Verdict Criteria

- **approved**: Passes all type-specific validation, no collapse violations, meets quality gates
- **needs-revision**: Minor issues fixable in place (clarity, missing examples, small gaps)
- **restructure-required**: Collapse detected requiring split, or fundamental type mismatch

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…