Skip to content
Back to skills

Nw Source Verification

ASecurity

Source reputation tiers, cross-referencing methodology, bias detection, and citation format requirements

  • 615 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 2 views
  • Added September 5, 2026
ai-agentsrustgonode

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 5, 2026

npx -y skills add nWave-ai/nWave --skill nw-source-verification --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Nw Source Verification?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Nw Source Verification
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/nwave-ai-nw-source-verification-nwave/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/nwave-ai-nw-source-verification-nwave)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: nw-source-verification
description: Source reputation tiers, cross-referencing methodology, bias detection, and citation format requirements
user-invocable: false
disable-model-invocation: true
---

# Source Verification

## Source Reputation Tiers

Validate every source against the trusted source domains provided via prompt context.

| Tier | Score | Examples | Verification |
|------|-------|---------|-------------|
| High | 1.0 | Academic (*.edu, arxiv.org, ieee.org), Official (*.gov, w3.org, ietf.org), Tech docs (developer.mozilla.org), OSS foundations (apache.org, cncf.io) | Standard citation |
| Medium-High | 0.8 | Industry leaders (martinfowler.com, stackoverflow.com, infoq.com) | Cross-ref with 1+ high-tier |
| Medium | 0.6 | Community (medium.com verified experts, dev.to, hashnode.com) | Author verification + 3-source cross-ref |
| Excluded | 0.0 | Unverified blogs (*.blogspot.com, wordpress.com), quora.com, pastebin.com | Reject, log warning, find alternative |

## Cross-Referencing Methodology

1. **Identify** the specific assertion to verify
2. **Find** 2+ independent sources not citing each other (avoid circular refs)
3. **Verify independence**: different authors, publishers, organizations
4. **Compare**: agree on substance (minor wording differences OK)
5. **Document**: verified / partially verified / unverified per finding

### Circular Reference Detection
- Source B cites Source A = one source, not two
- Multiple sources referencing single study = cite the original
- Prefer primary over secondary sources

## Bias Detection Checklist

Evaluate before citing:
1. **Commercial interest**: selling related product/service?
2. **Sponsorship**: sponsored/funded content?
3. **Conflict of interest**: author benefits from conclusion?
4. **Geographic/cultural bias**: limited to single region?
5. **Temporal bias**: publication dates skewed to specific era?
6. **Cherry-picking**: contradictory evidence acknowledged?
7. **Logical fallacies**: correlation as causation, authority without evidence

When bias detected: note in Source Analysis, reduce confidence.

## Citation Format

```
[1] {Author/Organization}. "{Title}". {Publication/Website}. {Date}. {Full URL}. Accessed {YYYY-MM-DD}.
```

### Required Metadata Per Source
Source URL | Domain | Access date | Reputation score (from tiers) | Verification status

### Paywalled or Restricted Sources
Mark "[Paywalled]"/"[Restricted Access]" | Provide URL | Find open-access alternative | Note in Knowledge Gaps

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…