Skip to content
Back to skills

Full Review

ASecurity

Perform a comprehensive Rust architecture review covering coupling, change risks, and idiomatic code.

  • 109 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 2 views
  • Added September 12, 2026
code-qualityrustgo

Security analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 2 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned September 23, 2026

npx -y skills add nwiizo/cargo-coupling --skill full-review --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Full Review?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Full Review
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/nwiizo-full-review/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/nwiizo-full-review)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: full-review
description: Perform a comprehensive Rust architecture review covering coupling, change risks, and idiomatic code.
argument-hint: "[path]"
---

# Full Architecture Review

Review the requested scope (default `./src`) and produce evidence-backed priorities.
Use [review](../review/SKILL.md) for coupling analysis, then inspect the relevant
architecture boundaries and Rust implementation. Reuse current analysis results.

Consider coupling balance, architectural change risks, and Rust idioms as review
perspectives. Apply each where it can reveal a consequential problem; named personas,
separate agents, numeric expert scores, and fixed schedules are not required.
Delegate only when the user or applicable instructions request delegation, with a
bounded subtask for each agent.

Use history or a baseline when the question concerns trends or a PR. Run tests,
lint, or structural diagnostics when needed to substantiate findings or required
by repository policy. Report which checks actually ran and any missing coverage;
do not run duplicate output modes or repeat unchanged passing checks as phases.

Consolidate findings with source locations, impact, confidence, and concrete next
actions. Separate automated signals from conclusions verified in code. Preserve
good boundaries, stable hubs, and the analysis blind spots. Use the
[report example](output-template.md) when a structured report helps, adapting it to
the request and omitting unsupported scores or empty sections.

Complete the review with supported findings and limits. If fixes are also requested,
apply and verify the agreed scope without treating the report as a mandatory pause.

Files in this skill

  • SKILL.md1.2 KB
  • output-template.md1.2 KB

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…