Skip to content
Back to skills

Continuous Evals

ASecurity

Regression-gate changes to the agent configuration (AGENTS.md, .agents/ rules, skills, agents, workflows, hooks) by replaying recorded tasks and blocking if the pass rate drops below baseline. Use when changing any agent configuration, or when adding an eval task after a real agent mistake. Implements DORA AI Capability 7.

  • 2 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added October 7, 2026
ai-agentsgogit

Works with

  • claude code
  • cursor
  • cli
  • mcp

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned October 7, 2026

npx -y skills add paruff/uFawkesAI --skill continuous-evals --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Continuous Evals?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Continuous Evals
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/paruff-continuous-evals/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/paruff-continuous-evals)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: continuous-evals
description: "Regression-gate changes to the agent configuration (AGENTS.md, .agents/ rules, skills, agents, workflows, hooks) by replaying recorded tasks and blocking if the pass rate drops below baseline. Use when changing any agent configuration, or when adding an eval task after a real agent mistake. Implements DORA AI Capability 7."
license: MIT
compatibility: Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, OpenCode, Cursor, Codex, Gemini CLI
metadata:
  author: paruff
  suite: uFawkesAI
---

# Skill: continuous-evals

> **Load trigger:** "load continuous-evals skill" > **DORA:** AI Capability 7: Quality internal platforms
> **Token cost:** Low to load; a run costs one cheap-model call per task

## Purpose

Agent configuration is code: a reworded rule or a retired skill can silently
change what agents do. This skill makes configuration changes regression-safe
the same way tests make code changes safe.

## How it works

| Piece | Path |
| --- | --- |
| Tasks (one JSON file each) | `.agents/evals/tasks/*.json` |
| Baseline rate per rubric dimension | `.agents/evals/baseline.json` |
| Runner | `scripts/run-evals.sh` |
| Gate's own self-test (offline, stub agent) | `scripts/test-run-evals.sh` |
| CI gate | `.github/workflows/agent-config-ci.yml` |

Each task runs in a throwaway copy of the working tree (CI: OpenCode; locally
`claude -p` by default) with a per-task timeout, and is scored on three rubric
dimensions from its transcript:

- **task success** — `expect`: `output_regex`, `file_absent`, `file_present`;
- **tool use** — `rubric.tool_use.forbidden` / `required`: anchored,
  case-insensitive regexes over tool names, MCP tools included;
- **trajectory** — `rubric.trajectory.max_steps`: model steps taken.

The run fails if any dimension's rate drops below `baseline.json`, if there
are no tasks, or if a task has no expectation or no rubric. CI runs it on
config changes, on pushes to `main`, and weekly.
A non-zero agent exit also fails a task, unless it sets
`"ignore_agent_exit": true` in `expect`: use that only for "must not happen"
tasks (e.g. `protected-env`) where a blocked tool call may legitimately exit
non-zero. A crashed agent also leaves a file absent, so never use it for tasks
that expect a positive result.

## Procedure

1. Changing configuration? Run `scripts/run-evals.sh` before pushing.
   CI runs it anyway on any change to `AGENTS.md`, `.agents/`, `.claude/`,
   `.opencode/`, hooks, or `.pre-commit-config.yaml`.
2. An agent got something wrong in real work? Add a task that reproduces it:

   ```json
   {
     "id": "short-kebab-id",
     "why": "which rule/skill/agent this protects",
     "prompt": "the real request, answerable in a few turns",
     "permission_mode": "acceptEdits",
     "expect": { "output_regex": "…" },
     "rubric": {
       "tool_use": { "forbidden": ["write|edit|serena_(create|replace|insert)_.*"] },
       "trajectory": { "max_steps": 6 }
     }
   }
   ```

   Prefer a grader that cannot pass by accident: a file check, or a regex
   that only the correct answer matches.
3. Raising the baseline: allowed any time the suite passes at the higher rate.
   Lowering it needs a reason in the PR description — that is the point.

## Limits

- A regex grader checks the answer, not the reasoning. Keep tasks narrow.
- Model output varies; tasks must be robust to phrasing, or they flake and
  someone lowers the baseline to get green.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…