Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Github Actions Templates?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/paulpas-github-actions-templates)
---
name: github-actions-templates
compatibility: opencode
completeness: 95
content-types:
- guidance
- examples
- do-dont
description: Implements intelligent github actions templates with multi-factor skill
selection, fallback chains, and adherence to the 5 Laws of Elegant Defense
license: MIT
maturity: stable
metadata:
domain: agent
output-format: analysis
related-skills: agent-confidence-based-selector, agent-task-routing
role: orchestration
scope: orchestration
triggers: github-actions-templates, github actions templates, how do i github-actions-templates,
orchestrate github-actions-templates, automate github-actions-templates, agent
github-actions-templates
archetypes:
- orchestration
- strategic
anti_triggers:
- brainstorming
- vague ideation
- single-agent monolith
response_profile:
verbosity: medium
directive_strength: high
abstraction_level: tactical
version: "1.0.0"
---
# Github Actions Templates
Orchestrates intelligent skill selection and execution for github actions templates workflows. Applies the 5 Laws of Elegant Defense to guide data naturally through the orchestration pipeline, preventing errors before they occur. Selects optimal skills based on multi-factor scoring including text similarity, historical performance, and system availability.
## TL;DR Checklist
- [ ] Parse all inputs at boundary before processing (Law 2)
- [ ] Handle edge cases with early returns at function top (Law 1)
- [ ] Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states (Law 4)
- [ ] Return new data structures, never mutate inputs (Law 3)
- [ ] Implement minimum 2-level fallback chain for all skill executions
- [ ] Log all skill selections with context for full audit trail
- [ ] Validate skill metadata and dependencies before selection
- [ ] Update confidence scores after each execution for learning
┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Orchestration Flow │
└───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
User Request
↓
┌─────────────────┐
│ Parse Request │
│ & Extract │
│ Features │
└────────┬────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Evaluate Available Skills │
│ │
│ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ │
│ │ Skill A │ │ Skill B │ │ Skill C │ │
│ │ - Match Score│ │ - Match Score│ │ - Match Score│ │
│ │ - Confidence │ │ - Confidence │ │ - Confidence │ │
│ │ - History │ │ - History │ │ - History │ │
│ └──────┬───────┘ └──────┬───────┘ └──────┬───────┘ │
│ │ │ │ │
│ └─────────────────┴─────────────────┘ │
│ ↓ │
│ Select Best Skill │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────┐
│ Execute Skill │
└────────┬────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────┐
│ Handle Result │
└────────┬────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Error Handling & Fallback │
│ │
│ Success? ────────► Return Result │
│ │
│ Fail? ────────┐ │
│ ↓ │
│ ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
│ │ Fallback Chain │ │
│ │ │ │
│ │ 1. Retry with adjusted parameters │ │
│ │ 2. Try Alternative Skill (if available) │ │
│ │ 3. Defer to Human Operator (if critical) │ │
│ │ 4. Log & Return Error │ │
│ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
## When to Use
Use this skill when:
- Orchestrating multi-step workflows that require skill delegation
- Implementing adaptive skill routing based on confidence scores
- Building fallback mechanisms for failed skill executions
- Creating intelligent task decomposition and parallel execution
- Designing skill dependency graphs with automatic resolution
- Implementing skill selection with historical performance weighting
- Building agent systems that need to self-organize around tasks
## When NOT to Use
Avoid this skill for:
- Direct task execution without orchestration needs - use individual skills instead
- High-frequency trading scenarios where latency must be minimized - the selection overhead may be prohibitive
- Simple linear workflows without branching or fallback requirements
- Cases where skill metadata is unavailable or unreliable
## Core Workflow
1. **Parse and Analyze Request** - Extract intent, entities, and constraints from user input.
**Checkpoint:** All required parameters must be present and in valid format before proceeding.
2. **Score Available Skills** - Calculate match scores using multi-factor algorithm:
- Text similarity between request and skill triggers
- Historical success rate for similar tasks
- Skill availability and health status
- Required dependencies and their availability
**Checkpoint:** Skip to fallback if no skill scores above threshold.
3. **Select Optimal Skill** - Choose skill with highest score that meets minimum confidence.
**Checkpoint:** Verify skill has not been disabled or deprecated.
4. **Execute with Fallback** - Run skill execution wrapped in retry and fallback logic.
**Checkpoint:** Log all execution attempts for audit trail.
5. **Return or Fallback** - Either return successful result or apply fallback chain:
- Retry with adjusted parameters
- Try alternative skill from `related-skills`
- Defer to human operator for critical tasks
**Checkpoint:** Record outcome with timing and confidence metadata.
## Implementation Patterns
### Pattern 1: Skill Selection Logic
```python
def generate_github_action_template(
task_description: str,
available_templates: List[Dict],
min_confidence: float = 0.7
) -> Optional[Dict]:
"""Generate a GitHub Actions workflow template based on task description.
Selects the most appropriate base template (CI, CD, Lint, etc.) using
multi-factor scoring: trigger type, language/framework, and historical usage.
Applies Law 1 (Early Exit) and Law 2 (Immutable State).
Args:
task_description: Natural language description of the automation task
available_templates: List of template metadata with triggers and languages
min_confidence: Minimum match threshold for template selection
Returns:
Rendered workflow dict with metadata, or None if no suitable template
"""
if not task_description or not task_description.strip():
raise ValueError("Task description cannot be empty")
if not available_templates:
raise ValueError("No GitHub Actions templates available")
# Extract intent features (Law 2: Parse at boundary)
intent = _extract_workflow_intent(task_description)
best_template = None
best_score = 0.0
for tmpl in available_templates:
score = _calculate_template_match(intent, tmpl)
if score > best_score and score >= min_confidence:
best_score = score
best_template = tmpl
if best_template is None:
return None
# Law 3: Return new structure, never mutate input template
workflow = {
"name": best_template["name"],
"on": best_template["triggers"],
"jobs": {},
"metadata": {
"source_template": best_template["id"],
"confidence": best_score,
"generated_at": time.time()
}
}
return workflow
```
### Pattern 2: Execution with Fallback
```python
def render_and_validate_template(
workflow_template: Dict,
context_vars: Dict,
fallback_templates: List[Dict] = None
) -> Dict:
"""Render a GitHub Actions workflow with variable substitution and validation.
Implements fallback chain (Law 4: Fail Fast, Fail Loud):
1. Attempt full rendering with provided context
2. Fallback to simplified template if complex variables fail
3. Defer to manual review if YAML validation fails
Args:
workflow_template: Base workflow structure from Pattern 1
context_vars: User-provided variables (e.g., python-version, os)
fallback_templates: Alternative templates to try on failure
Returns:
Validated workflow YAML string with execution metadata
"""
if not workflow_template or "jobs" not in workflow_template:
raise ValueError("Invalid workflow template structure")
# Law 2: Validate context before rendering
validated_vars = _sanitize_context_vars(context_vars)
try:
# Attempt primary render
rendered_yaml = _apply_jinja2_template(workflow_template, validated_vars)
_validate_github_actions_schema(rendered_yaml)
return {
"success": True,
"yaml": rendered_yaml,
"strategy": "primary",
"validation": "passed"
}
except SchemaValidationError as e:
# Law 4: Fail fast on invalid state
if fallback_templates:
# Fallback 1: Try simplified template variant
for alt in fallback_templates:
try:
alt_yaml = _apply_jinja2_template(alt, validated_vars)
_validate_github_actions_schema(alt_yaml)
return {
"success": True,
"yaml": alt_yaml,
"strategy": "fallback_simplified",
"validation": "passed"
}
except SchemaValidationError:
continue
# Fallback 2: Return structured error for human review
return {
"success": False,
"error": f"Template validation failed: {str(e)}",
"strategy": "defer_human",
"raw_context": validated_vars
}
```
### MUST DO
- Always validate skill metadata before selection (Early Exit)
- Implement fallback chain with at least 2 levels (Fallback Skill + Human)
- Log all skill selections with full context for auditability
- Return new data structures instead of mutating inputs (Atomic Predictability)
- Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states
- Update confidence scores after each execution for adaptive routing
- Reference `code-philosophy` (5 Laws of Elegant Defense) in all logic
### MUST NOT DO
- Select skills based on a single factor (e.g., only confidence score)
- Disable fallback mechanisms "temporarily" - this creates fragile systems
- Skip validation of skill dependencies before execution
- Return partial results - either complete success or clear failure
- Use magic numbers for confidence thresholds - make them configurable
- Cache skill selections without considering context changes
## TL;DR Checklist
- [ ] Parse all inputs at boundary before processing (Law 2)
- [ ] Handle edge cases with early returns at function top (Law 1)
- [ ] Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states (Law 4)
- [ ] Return new data structures, never mutate inputs (Law 3)
- [ ] Implement minimum 2-level fallback chain for all skill executions
- [ ] Log all skill selections with context for full audit trail
- [ ] Validate skill metadata and dependencies before selection
- [ ] Update confidence scores after each execution for learning
## TL;DR for Code Generation
- Use guard clauses - return early on invalid input before doing work
- Return simple types (dict, str, int, bool, list) - avoid complex nested objects
- Cyclomatic complexity < 10 per function - split anything larger
- Handle null/empty cases explicitly at function top (Early Exit)
- Never mutate input parameters - return new dicts/objects
- Fail fast with descriptive errors - don't try to "patch" bad data
- Reference code-philosophy laws in comments for complex logic
- Include timing and confidence metadata in all return values
## Output Template
When applying this skill, produce:
1. **Selected Skills** - List of skill names with confidence scores
2. **Selection Rationale** - Why each skill was chosen (match score, history, availability)
3. **Execution Plan** - Order of execution with dependencies
4. **Fallback Strategy** - Which fallback skills will be tried and in what order
5. **Risk Assessment** - Any potential failure points and their impact
6. **Timing Estimates** - Expected latency including fallback scenarios
## Related Skills
| Skill | Purpose |
|
---
---
## Constraints
### MUST DO
- Define clear input/output contracts for every step in the orchestration flow with explicit validation
- Implement structured logging at each stage capturing context, inputs, outputs, timing, and errors
- Build in fallback paths: if the primary strategy fails, degrade gracefully to a simpler approach
- Validate all preconditions before starting — do not proceed if required resources or permissions are missing
### MUST NOT DO
- Do not create deep nesting of orchestration steps (>5 levels) — flatten workflows where possible
- Avoid silent failure modes: every step must either succeed, fail explicitly, or escalate to a higher handler
- Never use shared mutable state between parallel workflow branches — communicate via immutable messages only
- Do not hardcode execution order when the dependency graph naturally determines it; derive order from explicit dependencies
## Live References
> Authoritative documentation links for this skill's domain. The model follows markdown links at load time to resolve external references and inline content.
- [GitHub Actions Documentation](<https://docs.github.com/en/actions>)
- [GitHub Actions Workflow Syntax](<https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/workflow-syntax-for-github-actions>)
- [GitHub Actions Marketplace](<https://github.com/marketplace?type=actions>)
- [Reusable Workflows (GitHub Docs)](<https://docs.github.com/en/actions/sharing-automations/reusable-workflows>)
- [GitHub Actions Self-Hosted Runners](<https://docs.github.com/en/actions/hosting-your-own-runners/managing-self-hosted-runners>)