Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Google Analytics Automation?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/paulpas-google-analytics-automation)
---
name: google-analytics-automation
compatibility: opencode
completeness: 95
content-types:
- guidance
- examples
- do-dont
description: Implements intelligent google analytics automation with multi-factor
skill selection, fallback chains, and adherence to the 5 Laws of Elegant Defense
license: MIT
maturity: stable
metadata:
domain: agent
output-format: analysis
related-skills: agent-confidence-based-selector, agent-task-routing
role: orchestration
scope: orchestration
triggers: google-analytics-automation, google analytics automation, how do i google-analytics-automation,
orchestrate google-analytics-automation, automate google-analytics-automation,
agent google-analytics-automation
archetypes:
- orchestration
- strategic
anti_triggers:
- brainstorming
- vague ideation
- single-agent monolith
response_profile:
verbosity: medium
directive_strength: high
abstraction_level: tactical
version: "1.0.0"
---
# Google Analytics Automation
Orchestrates intelligent skill selection and execution for google analytics automation workflows. Applies the 5 Laws of Elegant Defense to guide data naturally through the orchestration pipeline, preventing errors before they occur. Selects optimal skills based on multi-factor scoring including text similarity, historical performance, and system availability.
## TL;DR Checklist
- [ ] Parse all inputs at boundary before processing (Law 2)
- [ ] Handle edge cases with early returns at function top (Law 1)
- [ ] Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states (Law 4)
- [ ] Return new data structures, never mutate inputs (Law 3)
- [ ] Implement minimum 2-level fallback chain for all skill executions
- [ ] Log all skill selections with context for full audit trail
- [ ] Validate skill metadata and dependencies before selection
- [ ] Update confidence scores after each execution for learning
┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Orchestration Flow │
└───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
User Request
↓
┌─────────────────┐
│ Parse Request │
│ & Extract │
│ Features │
└────────┬────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Evaluate Available Skills │
│ │
│ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ │
│ │ Skill A │ │ Skill B │ │ Skill C │ │
│ │ - Match Score│ │ - Match Score│ │ - Match Score│ │
│ │ - Confidence │ │ - Confidence │ │ - Confidence │ │
│ │ - History │ │ - History │ │ - History │ │
│ └──────┬───────┘ └──────┬───────┘ └──────┬───────┘ │
│ │ │ │ │
│ └─────────────────┴─────────────────┘ │
│ ↓ │
│ Select Best Skill │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────┐
│ Execute Skill │
└────────┬────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────┐
│ Handle Result │
└────────┬────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Error Handling & Fallback │
│ │
│ Success? ────────► Return Result │
│ │
│ Fail? ────────┐ │
│ ↓ │
│ ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
│ │ Fallback Chain │ │
│ │ │ │
│ │ 1. Retry with adjusted parameters │ │
│ │ 2. Try Alternative Skill (if available) │ │
│ │ 3. Defer to Human Operator (if critical) │ │
│ │ 4. Log & Return Error │ │
│ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
## When to Use
Use this skill when:
- Orchestrating multi-step workflows that require skill delegation
- Implementing adaptive skill routing based on confidence scores
- Building fallback mechanisms for failed skill executions
- Creating intelligent task decomposition and parallel execution
- Designing skill dependency graphs with automatic resolution
- Implementing skill selection with historical performance weighting
- Building agent systems that need to self-organize around tasks
## When NOT to Use
Avoid this skill for:
- Direct task execution without orchestration needs - use individual skills instead
- High-frequency trading scenarios where latency must be minimized - the selection overhead may be prohibitive
- Simple linear workflows without branching or fallback requirements
- Cases where skill metadata is unavailable or unreliable
## Core Workflow
1. **Parse and Analyze Request** - Extract intent, entities, and constraints from user input.
**Checkpoint:** All required parameters must be present and in valid format before proceeding.
2. **Score Available Skills** - Calculate match scores using multi-factor algorithm:
- Text similarity between request and skill triggers
- Historical success rate for similar tasks
- Skill availability and health status
- Required dependencies and their availability
**Checkpoint:** Skip to fallback if no skill scores above threshold.
3. **Select Optimal Skill** - Choose skill with highest score that meets minimum confidence.
**Checkpoint:** Verify skill has not been disabled or deprecated.
4. **Execute with Fallback** - Run skill execution wrapped in retry and fallback logic.
**Checkpoint:** Log all execution attempts for audit trail.
5. **Return or Fallback** - Either return successful result or apply fallback chain:
- Retry with adjusted parameters
- Try alternative skill from `related-skills`
- Defer to human operator for critical tasks
**Checkpoint:** Record outcome with timing and confidence metadata.
## Implementation Patterns
### Pattern 1: Skill Selection Logic
```python
def build_ga4_report_request(
property_id: str,
dimensions: List[str],
metrics: List[str],
date_range_start: str,
date_range_end: str,
dimension_filters: Optional[List[FilterExpression]] = None
) -> Dict:
"""Construct a GA4 BatchRunReportsRequest payload with validation.
Implements Law 2 (Make Illegal States Unrepresentable) by validating
GA4 API constraints before network calls:
- Max 7 dimensions, 10 metrics per report
- Date range must be <= 90 days
- Metric names must match GA4 standard naming (e.g., 'activeUsers')
Args:
property_id: GA4 property ID (format: 'properties/123456789')
dimensions: List of dimension names to include
metrics: List of metric names to include
date_range_start: ISO 8601 date string
date_range_end: ISO 8601 date string
dimension_filters: Optional list of FilterExpression objects
Returns:
Validated GA4 report request dictionary ready for API submission
Raises:
ValueError: If constraints are violated or property_id is malformed
"""
# Guard clause - Early Exit (Law 1)
if not property_id.startswith("properties/"):
raise ValueError("property_id must be in format 'properties/<ID>'")
if len(dimensions) > 7 or len(metrics) > 10:
raise ValueError("GA4 API limits: max 7 dimensions, 10 metrics per report")
# Parse input - Make Illegal States Unrepresentable (Law 2)
start_date = datetime.fromisoformat(date_range_start)
end_date = datetime.fromisoformat(date_range_end)
if (end_date - start_date).days > 90:
raise ValueError("GA4 API limits: date range cannot exceed 90 days")
# Atomic Predictability (Law 3) - Return new dict, don't mutate inputs
request_payload = {
"reportRequests": [{
"property": property_id,
"dimensions": [{"name": d} for d in dimensions],
"metrics": [{"name": m} for m in metrics],
"dateRanges": [{"startDate": date_range_start, "endDate": date_range_end}],
"dimensionFilter": dimension_filters[0] if dimension_filters else None
}]
}
return request_payload
```
### Pattern 2: Execution with Fallback
```python
def execute_ga4_report_with_retry(
request_payload: Dict,
client: AnalyticsDataClient,
max_retries: int = 2
) -> Dict:
"""Execute GA4 BatchRunReportsRequest with resilience patterns.
Implements Fail Fast, Fail Loud (Law 4) for GA4 API interactions:
- Invalid auth tokens fail immediately with refresh instructions
- Rate limits trigger exponential backoff fallback
- Partial results are never returned - only complete or explicit failure
Fallback chain:
1. Retry with original payload (transient network error)
2. Retry with reduced dimension/metric count (rate limit fallback)
3. Defer to cached report or human operator (critical data unavailability)
Args:
request_payload: Validated GA4 report request dictionary
client: Authenticated google.analytics.data_v1beta.AnalyticsDataClient
max_retries: Maximum retry attempts before fallback
Returns:
Structured analytics data with row values, metadata, and timing
Raises:
GA4ExecutionError: If all retries and fallbacks exhausted
"""
# Guard clause - validate client state (Early Exit)
if not client._transport._credentials.valid:
raise GA4ExecutionError("GA4 credentials expired. Refresh token required.")
for attempt in range(max_retries + 1):
try:
response = client.batch_run_reports(request=request_payload)
report = response.reports[0]
# Success - Atomic Predictability (Law 3)
return {
"success": True,
"metrics": [m.name for m in report.metric_headers],
"dimensions": [d.name for d in report.dimension_headers],
"rows": [
{
"dimensions": [d.value for d in row.dimension_values],
"metrics": [m.value for m in row.metric_values]
}
for row in report.rows
],
"attempts": attempt + 1,
"latency_ms": _calculate_latency()
}
except ResourceExhausted:
# Transient error - try fallback with reduced scope
if attempt == max_retries:
return _apply_ga4_fallback(request_payload, client)
time.sleep(2 ** attempt)
except InvalidArgument as e:
# Fail Fast - Don't try to patch bad GA4 parameters (Law 4)
raise GA4ExecutionError(f"Invalid GA4 request parameters: {str(e)}") from e
# All retries exhausted - Fail Loud (Law 4)
raise GA4ExecutionError(
f"GA4 report failed after {max_retries + 1} attempts for {request_payload['reportRequests'][0]['property']}"
)
```
### MUST DO
- Always validate skill metadata before selection (Early Exit)
- Implement fallback chain with at least 2 levels (Fallback Skill + Human)
- Log all skill selections with full context for auditability
- Return new data structures instead of mutating inputs (Atomic Predictability)
- Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states
- Update confidence scores after each execution for adaptive routing
- Reference `code-philosophy` (5 Laws of Elegant Defense) in all logic
### MUST NOT DO
- Select skills based on a single factor (e.g., only confidence score)
- Disable fallback mechanisms "temporarily" - this creates fragile systems
- Skip validation of skill dependencies before execution
- Return partial results - either complete success or clear failure
- Use magic numbers for confidence thresholds - make them configurable
- Cache skill selections without considering context changes
## TL;DR Checklist
- [ ] Parse all inputs at boundary before processing (Law 2)
- [ ] Handle edge cases with early returns at function top (Law 1)
- [ ] Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states (Law 4)
- [ ] Return new data structures, never mutate inputs (Law 3)
- [ ] Implement minimum 2-level fallback chain for all skill executions
- [ ] Log all skill selections with context for full audit trail
- [ ] Validate skill metadata and dependencies before selection
- [ ] Update confidence scores after each execution for learning
## TL;DR for Code Generation
- Use guard clauses - return early on invalid input before doing work
- Return simple types (dict, str, int, bool, list) - avoid complex nested objects
- Cyclomatic complexity < 10 per function - split anything larger
- Handle null/empty cases explicitly at function top (Early Exit)
- Never mutate input parameters - return new dicts/objects
- Fail fast with descriptive errors - don't try to "patch" bad data
- Reference code-philosophy laws in comments for complex logic
- Include timing and confidence metadata in all return values
## Output Template
When applying this skill, produce:
1. **Selected Skills** - List of skill names with confidence scores
2. **Selection Rationale** - Why each skill was chosen (match score, history, availability)
3. **Execution Plan** - Order of execution with dependencies
4. **Fallback Strategy** - Which fallback skills will be tried and in what order
5. **Risk Assessment** - Any potential failure points and their impact
6. **Timing Estimates** - Expected latency including fallback scenarios
## Related Skills
| Skill | Purpose |
|
---
---
## Constraints
### MUST DO
- Implement idempotent automation triggers: running the same automation twice should not create duplicate resources or actions
- Validate all trigger conditions with explicit allowlists before executing automated actions
- Include rollback procedures in every automation workflow — every CREATE should have a corresponding DELETE capability
- Log all automation executions with input state, output state, duration, and any errors for monitoring and debugging
### MUST NOT DO
- Do not create circular automation loops where trigger A causes action B which triggers A again
- Avoid using automations that modify production data without explicit human approval gates
- Never embed API keys or credentials directly in automation workflows — use vaulted secrets with rotation
- Do not assume external service availability; implement retry logic with exponential backoff and dead-letter queues
## Live References
> Authoritative documentation links for this skill's domain. The model follows markdown links at load time to resolve external references and inline content.
- [Google Analytics 4 (GA4) Documentation](<https://developers.google.com/analytics>)
- [GA4 REST API Reference](<https://developers.google.com/analytics/devguides/reporting/data/v1>)
- [Google Analytics Admin API](<https://developers.google.com/analytics/devguides/config/admin/v1>)
- [Google Tag Manager Documentation](<https://support.google.com/tagmanager/>)
- [GA4 Event Tracking Guide](<https://developers.google.com/analytics/devguides/collection/protocol/ga4/events>)