Evaluates test-time adaptation (TTA) capabilities of vision-language models under distribution shift and class imbalance. It probes how well a model can adapt to out-of-distribution and cross-domain image classification tasks without training, using adaptive entropy-based uncertainty estimation to select confident augmented views. Use when the user wants to benchmark on ImageNet & Cross-Domain Benchmarks, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports accuracy.
Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Adte Tta Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-adte-tta-eval)
---
name: adte-tta-eval
description: Evaluates test-time adaptation (TTA) capabilities of vision-language models under distribution shift and class imbalance. It probes how well a model can adapt to out-of-distribution and cross-domain image classification tasks without training, using adaptive entropy-based uncertainty estimation to select confident augmented views. Use when the user wants to benchmark on ImageNet & Cross-Domain Benchmarks, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports accuracy.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2602.11743
bibtex_key: wu2026adte
confidence: high
---
# adte-tta-eval
> Adaptive Debiasing Tsallis Entropy for Test-Time Adaptation — Wu et al. (2026) (arXiv:2602.11743, 2026)
## What this evaluates
Evaluates test-time adaptation (TTA) capabilities of vision-language models under distribution shift and class imbalance. It probes how well a model can adapt to out-of-distribution and cross-domain image classification tasks without training, using adaptive entropy-based uncertainty estimation to select confident augmented views.
## Datasets
- **ImageNet & Cross-Domain Benchmarks** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
## Metrics
- `accuracy` **(primary)** — range: percent
- Percentage of correctly classified test images out of the total number of test images. Reported per dataset and averaged across OOD variants or cross-domain datasets.
## Input / output format
**Input**: RGB image patches paired with text prompts (either hand-crafted templates or GPT-generated CuPL descriptions), processed by a frozen CLIP vision encoder (ViT-B/16 or ViT-L/14) during inference.
**Output**: Class prediction probabilities (logits) and entropy/uncertainty scores for each augmented view, used to select the most confident predictions for test-time adaptation.
## Scoring recipe
```python
predictions = []
for image, label in test_set:
views = augment(image, N=64)
probs = model(views, text_prompts)
selected_probs = filter_confident(probs, ratio=0.1)
pred = argmax(selected_probs)
predictions.append(pred)
accuracy = sum(p == l for p, l in zip(predictions, labels)) / len(labels)
```
## Common pitfalls
- Hyperparameters are strictly fixed (N=64 views, 0.1 filtering ratio, memory bank size=10, q interval [0.01, 0.9]) and must not be tuned per dataset.
- Results must be averaged over 3 random seeds, and both template-based and CuPL text prompts should be evaluated separately.
- The memory bank size of 1 does not mean the bank can be removed; it still aggregates pseudo-labels across all 200+ categories for bias estimation.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> Table 1: Accuracy comparison (%) on ImageNet and its variants for CLIP ViT-B/16 and ViT-L/14.
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{wu2026adte,
title={Adaptive Debiasing Tsallis Entropy for Test-Time Adaptation},
author={Wu et al. (2026)},
year={2026},
note={arXiv:2602.11743}
}
```
- arXiv: 2602.11743