Evaluates autonomous clinical decision-making agents on Electronic Health Record (EHR) data. It probes multi-step reasoning, long-context dependency preservation, and robustness to distribution shifts across different hospital databases and clinical event types. Use when the user wants to benchmark on MIMIC-IV / MIMIC-III, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports average score.
Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Agentehr Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-agentehr-eval)
---
name: agentehr-eval
description: Evaluates autonomous clinical decision-making agents on Electronic Health Record (EHR) data. It probes multi-step reasoning, long-context dependency preservation, and robustness to distribution shifts across different hospital databases and clinical event types. Use when the user wants to benchmark on MIMIC-IV / MIMIC-III, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports average score.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2601.13918
bibtex_key: liao2026agentehr
confidence: high
---
# agentehr-eval
> AgentEHR: Advancing Autonomous Clinical Decision-Making via Retrospective Summarization — Liao et al. (2026) (arXiv:2601.13918, 2026)
## What this evaluates
Evaluates autonomous clinical decision-making agents on Electronic Health Record (EHR) data. It probes multi-step reasoning, long-context dependency preservation, and robustness to distribution shifts across different hospital databases and clinical event types.
## Datasets
- **MIMIC-IV / MIMIC-III** — total ?; splits: test (-1); repo https://github.com/BlueZeros/AgentEHR
## Metrics
- `average score` **(primary)** — range: [0, 1]
- Accuracy (or F1) averaged across six clinical event categories: Diagnoses, Labevents, Microbiology, Prescriptions, Procedures, and Transfers.
## Input / output format
**Input**: Raw, noisy Electronic Health Record (EHR) interaction history and patient data requiring multi-step clinical reasoning.
**Output**: Clinical decisions or actions corresponding to the six event categories.
## Scoring recipe
```python
def compute_metric(predictions, gold):
categories = ['Diagnoses', 'Labevents', 'Microbiology', 'Prescriptions', 'Procedures', 'Transfers']
scores = []
for cat in categories:
scores.append(accuracy_score(gold[cat], predictions[cat]))
return sum(scores) / len(scores)
```
## Common pitfalls
- Unidirectional summary compression causes critical information loss, especially for strong backbone models.
- Evolving experience strategies show high instability and may degrade performance on weaker models.
- Distribution shifts between MIMIC-IV and MIMIC-III formats can cause severe brittleness in baseline methods.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> The evolving variant of RetroSum achieves the highest average score of 0.2880.
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{liao2026agentehr,
title={AgentEHR: Advancing Autonomous Clinical Decision-Making via Retrospective Summarization},
author={Liao et al. (2026)},
year={2026},
note={arXiv:2601.13918}
}
```
- arXiv: 2601.13918