Evaluates the performance of LLMs fine-tuned on synthetic data generated by AIDE across a suite of standard knowledge and reasoning benchmarks. It probes zero-shot and few-shot generalization capabilities compared to models fine-tuned on human-curated gold data. Use when the user wants to benchmark on MMLU, FinBen, ARC-Challenge, GSM8K, TruthfulQA, MedQA, BIG-Bench, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports zero-shot accuracy.
Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Aide Benchmark Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-aide-benchmark-eval)
---
name: aide-benchmark-eval
description: Evaluates the performance of LLMs fine-tuned on synthetic data generated by AIDE across a suite of standard knowledge and reasoning benchmarks. It probes zero-shot and few-shot generalization capabilities compared to models fine-tuned on human-curated gold data. Use when the user wants to benchmark on MMLU, FinBen, ARC-Challenge, GSM8K, TruthfulQA, MedQA, BIG-Bench, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports zero-shot accuracy.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2412.06136
bibtex_key: li2024aide
confidence: high
---
# aide-benchmark-eval
> AIDE: Attribute-Guided MultI-Hop Data Expansion for Data Scarcity in Task-Specific Fine-tuning — Jiayu Li et al. (arXiv:2412.06136, 2024)
## What this evaluates
Evaluates the performance of LLMs fine-tuned on synthetic data generated by AIDE across a suite of standard knowledge and reasoning benchmarks. It probes zero-shot and few-shot generalization capabilities compared to models fine-tuned on human-curated gold data.
## Datasets
- **MMLU** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **FinBen** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **ARC-Challenge** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **GSM8K** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **TruthfulQA** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **MedQA** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- **BIG-Bench** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
## Metrics
- `zero-shot accuracy` **(primary)** — range: percent
- Percentage of correctly predicted answers across all benchmark tasks. For GSM8K, the paper reports 8-shot maj@8 performance instead.
## Input / output format
**Input**: Benchmark-specific prompts. Most tasks use zero-shot prompts. GSM8K uses 8-shot prompts with in-context examples.
**Output**: Model-generated answer strings or multiple-choice selections.
## Scoring recipe
```python
def compute_accuracy(predictions, gold):
correct = sum(1 for p, g in zip(predictions, gold) if p == g)
return correct / len(gold) * 100
def compute_maj_at_8(predictions_8shot):
# predictions_8shot is a list of lists, each inner list has 8 generations
maj_votes = [Counter(p).most_common(1)[0][0] for p in predictions_8shot]
return maj_votes
```
## Common pitfalls
- GSM8K uses a different evaluation protocol (8-shot maj@8) than the zero-shot accuracy used for other benchmarks.
- The paper reports average performance across benchmarks, which can mask task-specific variance.
- Self-BLEU is used for diversity analysis but is not the primary performance metric.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> We evaluated all models using zero-shot accuracy as the primary metric on the benchmarks. For GSM8K, we report 8-shot maj@8 performance using prompts from Wang et al. (2023).
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{li2024aide,
title={AIDE: Attribute-Guided MultI-Hop Data Expansion for Data Scarcity in Task-Specific Fine-tuning},
author={Jiayu Li et al.},
year={2024},
note={arXiv:2412.06136}
}
```
- arXiv: 2412.06136